2025-10-01 06:15:57 fdt /boot/dtbs-spacemit/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dtb 2025-10-01 06:16:32 oh, thats not montleons kernel 2025-10-01 06:16:46 Linux alpine-bpi-f3 6.6.53-1-spacemit #2-Alpine SMP 2024-11-16 07:35:39 riscv64 GNU/Linux 2025-10-01 06:17:05 i think i never got the montleon kernel work properly on bpi f3 2025-10-01 06:17:12 but it runs on orange pi rv2 2025-10-01 07:30:16 6.16.x works but with k1-x_deb1.dtb it don't 'see' emmc and can't work anything with it 2025-10-01 07:31:47 and looks like this is fixed in 6.17, but 6.17 fail to build wifi driver (again) 2025-10-01 07:36:12 in mainline chaos with dtbs for spacemit k1 is consolidated but only have two boards 2025-10-01 07:41:15 will try later to find working solution 2025-10-01 08:45:49 that may be the reason why I didnt update the kernel for my bpi f3 2025-10-01 14:33:07 Hi, is there any way I can contribute to the RISC-V port? 2025-10-01 14:39:55 AnIDFB: contribute to alpine or riscv in general? 2025-10-01 14:40:27 the risc-v port of alpine linux, if there's anything specific to it 2025-10-01 14:43:06 test boards, fix bug, work on new SoCs ... 2025-10-01 14:43:38 oh, and write guides or notes 2025-10-01 14:44:03 like on the alpine wiki? 2025-10-01 14:44:15 anywhere 2025-10-01 14:45:03 (says someone who don't like wiki) 2025-10-01 14:50:06 what about packages? 2025-10-01 14:52:18 well, if some package is buggy or don't work at all try to fix it and create merge request or open issue 2025-10-01 14:53:00 if you think to add new package also create MR 2025-10-01 14:54:20 Or check packages that exclude riscv64 and see if you can get them to work 2025-10-01 14:56:00 thanks for the help! also, is it ok if i add a section on contributing based on this advice to https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Riscv64? (i'll give credit of course) 2025-10-08 06:05:23 telegram-desktop for riscv64 takes 5 hours to build on gitlab CI. on dev lxc it takes 1 hour 2025-10-08 06:07:08 do we know for anyone who use alpine as desktop or anything as GUI on riscv64 2025-10-08 06:09:03 I ask because of dilemma enable or not application which take long time to build 2025-10-08 06:14:21 might be the CI used the banana pi, which is slower 2025-10-08 07:10:31 ah yes 2025-10-08 07:11:30 the question remains, should we enable tdesktop on riscv64 2025-10-08 08:44:46 i dont know if "slow to build" is a good enough reason to disable it. everything is slow to build on riscv64 2025-10-08 08:45:02 i suppose its up to the maintainer to decide 2025-10-08 08:45:57 but please hold any long running builds for stable branches for now 2025-10-08 08:46:02 im about to tag new releases 2025-10-08 08:49:41 ok, enabled it and pushed 2025-10-08 08:56:16 ncopa: you are right 2025-10-17 22:01:43 a single hour is fine, at least its not a chromium or so 2025-10-20 16:23:06 kernel 6.17 boots and works on JH7100 without patches, must be built with NONPORTABLE=y 2025-10-20 16:23:36 though usb doesn't work 2025-10-20 16:24:01 tested on visionfive V1 2025-10-21 11:36:25 algitbot: retry master 2025-10-22 20:44:51 is there any interest in a web app that shows which packages are available on x86_64 but not riscv64? call it "are we risc-v yet?" maybe? 2025-10-22 20:50:45 $ apkgquery '"!riscv64" in pkg.Arch' 2>/dev/null | wc -l 2025-10-22 20:50:48 629 2025-10-23 08:08:12 ncopa: does orange pi rv2 works with alpine? and what doesn't work 2025-10-23 10:04:45 stellarium builds on riscv64, maybe it can be enabled 2025-10-23 10:32:33 sure 2025-10-23 10:32:55 guess you can open a MR 2025-10-23 10:34:41 I'm testing some packages because contemplating to order musebook which have k1x soc 2025-10-23 10:35:33 X60 2025-10-23 11:55:29 i got the orangepi rv2 kernel work, but it broke nvme on banana pi 2025-10-23 11:55:54 and i dont want have different kernels for banana and orange pi 2025-10-23 12:31:53 not convenient but acceptable for me. hope in near future will be possible to have same kernel for them 2025-10-23 12:32:55 does ethernet and wifi works on rv2