2025-07-10 08:01:27 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-18 13:24:29 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-18 15:17:39 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-18 15:18:11 <mio> gitlab.a.o is offline
2025-07-18 15:22:37 <mps> mio: gitlab works, arm builders doesn't
2025-07-18 15:23:42 <mps> hm, gitlab again doesnt't work
2025-07-18 15:26:58 <mio> yeah, maybe temporary high load
2025-07-18 15:29:02 <mps> hm, no ping answer. probably they hangs or down
2025-07-21 14:36:40 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 08:13:12 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 08:58:18 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 09:11:42 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 09:49:28 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 12:10:11 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-22 12:22:15 <mps> algitbot: retry master
2025-07-23 15:14:00 <ncopa> mps: do you remember where the 00[1-6]-* patches comes from? https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/tree/master/testing/linux-spacemit
2025-07-23 15:14:32 <ncopa> and are they needed for bananapi bpi-f3? or is upstream bianbu good as is?
2025-07-23 15:14:56 <ncopa> they fail to apply with latest update: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/87689
2025-07-23 15:16:32 <mps> ncopa: they are from debian (non official) repo, don't have url right now
2025-07-23 15:17:40 <mps> also I think they are not needed nowadays
2025-07-23 15:19:38 <mps> though I didn't tested in last time. I use https://github.com/jmontleon/linux-bianbu repo for building kernels for bpi-f3
2025-07-23 15:21:22 <ncopa> oh, that looks better
2025-07-23 15:26:14 <mps> beware that 6.15.y currently cannot build wifi driver on alpine
2025-07-23 15:27:03 <mps> 6.14.y is ok. I wrote here about it one month ago
2025-07-23 15:27:28 <mps> was tempted to add it in testing
2025-07-23 15:28:13 <mps> it works fine but still schedutil governor is buggy
2025-07-23 15:29:21 <mps> waiting for 6.16.y stable release to add it to alpine as linux-k1x
2025-07-23 15:46:09 <mps> forgot to tell, I uploaded alpine img to dev.a.o with this kernel about month ago for some people on #riscv IRC channel
2025-07-24 18:20:09 <mps> ncopa: have you seen this https://github.com/jmontleon/linux-bianbu/issues/12
2025-07-24 18:21:29 <mps> I reported issue and it is fixed very fast. now 6.15.y and 6.16.y builds
2025-07-24 20:19:00 <ncopa> ok. I didnt have time to finish my bananapi bpi-f3 kernel upgrade. the kernelconfig is a maze
2025-07-25 06:58:47 <haesbaert> I'm having trouble finding docs on how to install alpine on a starfive visionfive 2, is this the way to go https://arvanta.net/alpine/alpine-on-visionfive/ ? Or was it already merged and I can use the generic u-boot image?
2025-07-25 07:40:01 <mps> haesbaert: there is no generic u-boot because every SBC have (nearly) have specific settings.
2025-07-25 08:00:48 <haesbaert> mps: I see, the images with u-boot distributed in https://alpinelinux.org/downloads/, how can one use them ? Is that for booting with qemu? If so, is the arvanta.net blog post is the way to go for starfive2 ?
2025-07-25 08:02:53 <mps> I don't know for what is https://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.22/releases/riscv64/alpine-uboot-3.22.1-riscv64.tar.gz
2025-07-25 08:04:21 <mps> for now 'proper' way is described in https://arvanta.net/alpine/alpine-on-visionfive/
2025-07-25 08:04:41 <haesbaert> oh now I see you're the one who wrote it, many thanks for writing that :)
2025-07-25 08:04:53 <haesbaert> great, I'll do that then
2025-07-25 08:05:14 <mps> yaw :)
2025-07-26 15:25:12 <haesbaert> can I cross compile for alpine risc64 from an alpine amd64? I see binutils-riscv64, gcc-riscv-none-elf, but I don't see a cross compiled packaged of musl, am I missing something?
2025-07-26 15:51:01 <mps> install all dev tools for alpine first
2025-07-26 15:51:30 <mps> and then `busybox time scripts/bootstrap.sh riscv64 testing/linux-k1x-rc` for example
2025-07-26 15:55:08 <haesbaert> aha I see it, it builds musl there. But now I'm confused, I see it also builds the target binutils: https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/scripts/bootstrap.sh#n93
2025-07-26 15:55:43 <haesbaert> If so who uses binutils-riscv64? I don't see anything depending on it
2025-07-26 15:55:49 <mps> yes, it builds all needed target tools
2025-07-26 16:13:52 <haesbaert> neat, it's working, many thanks
2025-07-26 20:15:24 <achill> mps <https://matrix.to/#/%40oftc_mps%3Apostmarketos.org>: can we not add the hold label to MRs and not add a explanation? this can be really frustrating for the MR author and a simple explaination like "i need to look at this more deeper" can already be helpful (and that might even lead to the MR author pinging you again in case you forgot to look at it again).
2025-07-27 05:34:33 <mps> how to disable message 'WARNING: The indexes contain broken packages which might not function properly.' in apk3
2025-07-27 05:40:31 <mps> like we don't know that 'packages might not function properly.' :)