2017-10-30 10:31:23 hello 2017-10-30 10:31:47 help me please 2017-10-30 10:32:45 ? 2017-10-30 10:32:53 hi 2017-10-30 10:32:54 хлеб? 2017-10-30 10:32:55 <_ikke_> xle6: Welcome here. It often helps to ask an actual question instead of asking for help 2017-10-30 10:33:01 how to install ssl certificates? And how to add it to trusted? 2017-10-30 10:33:24 <_ikke_> xle6: concatenate those certificates to /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.pem 2017-10-30 10:33:30 <_ikke_> (make sure they're PEM format) 2017-10-30 10:34:03 i think you can copy the certs to /etc/ssl/certs 2017-10-30 10:34:13 and then run update-certs-something 2017-10-30 10:34:25 update-ca-certificates 2017-10-30 10:35:16 update-ca-certificates will do concatenating for you 2017-10-30 10:35:29 and also update the java cert db if needed 2017-10-30 10:36:37 <_ikke_> ncopa: ah, nice to know 2017-10-30 10:38:38 Hello. Is it possible to enable the serial console at boot time on the installation media? 2017-10-30 10:38:54 yes 2017-10-30 10:39:25 ncopa, can't find it in the documentation. Any pointer? 2017-10-30 10:39:29 if you use an usb, then you can edit boot/syslinux/syslinux.cfg 2017-10-30 10:39:47 and to the boot option add console=ttyS0 2017-10-30 10:39:48 oh, easy indeed 2017-10-30 10:39:53 thanks 2017-10-30 13:50:49 xle6: https://github.com/Xe/dockerfiles/blob/master/base/alpine/bin/xeservca is the script i use 2017-10-30 13:59:57 anyone able to help with a problem with an alpine domU backend domain? Whenever a new PV is started with backend=domnet, I see "Guest Rx Ready" in the domnet dmesg, but the link never comes up 2017-10-30 14:33:59 How do Alpine maintain the grsecurity kernel now that the source code of the patch is not public anymore? 2017-10-30 16:52:45 Hello everyone! 2017-10-30 16:52:56 I'm planning to install Alpine Linux on a device for the first time some day when I have time, and since my linux skills are modest I expect to have a few questions for you before everything works the way I want. 2017-10-30 16:53:12 First question: What is the purpose of modloop? I've been reading on https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/DIY_Fully_working_Alpine_Linux_for_Allwinner_and_Other_ARM_SOCs and it explains well enough about the initramfs, but with the modloop file it only explains how and not why. 2017-10-30 16:55:55 Why can't the modules just be in /lib/modules? 2017-10-30 17:20:49 it’s for memory savings 2017-10-30 17:21:09 and also to make upgrading the system in ram safe 2017-10-30 17:21:24 so you don’t wind up losing your modules of the running kernel 2017-10-30 17:22:35 hello? 2017-10-30 17:22:57 hi 2017-10-30 17:23:16 i need help 2017-10-30 17:23:32 trying to install alpine on a server 2017-10-30 17:23:43 but it does not boot 2017-10-30 17:24:05 ok. thanks kaniini 2017-10-30 17:24:13 there can be millions of reasons why boot may fail 2017-10-30 17:24:33 i have tons of details 2017-10-30 17:24:56 my config? 2017-10-30 17:25:02 not millions of reasons, its more like 998000 something... 2017-10-30 17:25:20 david___: do you have an exact error message? 2017-10-30 17:26:07 mount: Mounting /dev/md2 on /sysroot failed: No such file or diretory 2017-10-30 17:26:35 it seems alpine kernel can not handle mdadm raid 2017-10-30 17:27:13 so you get an emergency shell 2017-10-30 17:27:24 yep 2017-10-30 17:27:30 can you verify that kernel module is loaded for lvm 2017-10-30 17:27:39 does /dev/md2 exist? 2017-10-30 17:27:46 its plain raid1 without lvm 2017-10-30 17:27:57 i mean raid kernel module 2017-10-30 17:28:09 tell me how 2017-10-30 17:28:15 what do yo uahve in /proc/mdstat 2017-10-30 17:28:43 nothing 2017-10-30 17:28:54 ls -l /dev/md2 2017-10-30 17:29:01 does it give anything? 2017-10-30 17:29:01 nothing :-( 2017-10-30 17:29:14 lsmod | grep raid 2017-10-30 17:29:40 nothing 2017-10-30 17:29:43 ok 2017-10-30 17:29:49 the kernel module is missing then 2017-10-30 17:29:56 ahh 2017-10-30 17:29:57 i assume its raid1? 2017-10-30 17:30:09 i have an idea :-D 2017-10-30 17:30:14 modprobe raid1 2017-10-30 17:30:26 i missed raid module while bootstrapping 2017-10-30 17:30:52 normally you add it to /etc/mkinitfs/mkinitfs.conf 2017-10-30 17:30:55 and possibly adding raid to FEATURES in /etc/mkinitfs/mkinitfs.conf 2017-10-30 17:31:04 let me try 2017-10-30 17:31:18 i come back in a few minutes 2017-10-30 17:35:46 do i need to add mdadm on sysinit? 2017-10-30 17:36:05 rc-update -q add mdadm sysinit ? 2017-10-30 17:36:30 it should be started from initramfs 2017-10-30 17:36:56 since its the root 2017-10-30 17:37:01 ok 2017-10-30 17:43:36 are there any known issues with raid and grsec ? 2017-10-30 17:44:55 hm.. still not booting / 2017-10-30 17:47:05 please have a look at this: https://gist.github.com/thde/5312a42665c5c901aef4 2017-10-30 17:47:19 this is the original script 2017-10-30 17:48:19 i tried to implement raid with mdadm . and played a lot with gpt/mbr with no success 2017-10-30 18:01:31 still helping me ? 2017-10-30 18:02:11 okay i've added raid in feature-list for mkinitfs 2017-10-30 18:03:06 modprobe raid1 works but /dev/md2 is still missing .. instead /dev/md125 ... 126 ..127 exists 2017-10-30 18:03:47 i think you need the mdadm.conf in your initramfs too 2017-10-30 18:04:15 yes good aspect, but maybee i have to turn off kvm 2017-10-30 18:08:50 mdadm.conf goes in via raid.files in features.d ... so did you regenerate your initramfs after adding that feature? 2017-10-30 18:09:41 I don't remember exactly how mdadm works but maybe those numbers are dynamic if it's not specified in the config? 2017-10-30 18:12:55 oh yeah :-D 2017-10-30 18:13:45 thats it... my mdadm.conf was under /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf but needs to be in /etc/mdadm.conf ... so now the labeling fits and the volume could be found 2017-10-30 18:14:29 thanx @ncopa and @TBB 2017-10-30 19:49:02 I have a question about the packages available in alpine linux. 2017-10-30 19:49:19 <_ikke_> misz1: just ask 2017-10-30 19:49:25 Why are some packages on the "edge" branch, terribly outdated? 2017-10-30 19:49:59 <_ikke_> misz1: probably because the maintainer didn't notice 2017-10-30 19:50:04 <_ikke_> misz1: Any examples? 2017-10-30 19:50:29 <_ikke_> or perhaps because newer versions have issues 2017-10-30 19:50:31 lightdm is version 1.10 2017-10-30 19:50:44 Newest is 1.24. Version 1.10 is from 2014 2017-10-30 19:50:57 <_ikke_> I gather you flagged them? 2017-10-30 19:51:04 Yes 2017-10-30 19:51:21 The maintainer of lightdm seems to have allot more packages that are also flagged. 2017-10-30 19:51:58 The earlies from 2016-09 2017-10-30 19:52:15 I mean, he's in here, so you could probably ask him why 2017-10-30 19:52:44 <_ikke_> ncopa created Alpine 2017-10-30 19:53:10 Would @ncopa like to comment? 2017-10-30 19:53:39 @_ikke_ Oh, I did not know that 2017-10-30 19:53:47 You learn things every day :) 2017-10-30 19:54:17 <_ikke_> He has a lot of packages on his name :-) 2017-10-30 19:54:35 it might just be a circumstance of too busy, needs someone to volunteer to maintain it 2017-10-30 19:55:45 I understand. There should be an easier way of maintaining Alpine packages, with musl and all 2017-10-30 19:56:44 <_ikke_> misz1: What do you propose/ 2017-10-30 19:56:45 <_ikke_> ? 2017-10-30 19:57:23 Well, for, lightdm specifically. There were some patches that are required in order to run on alpine because of musl. 2017-10-30 19:57:33 misz1: tbh, can always just submit patches when you see things that are both obviously out of date and easy to test 2017-10-30 19:57:38 <_ikke_> Well sure, there are more packages that have the same 2017-10-30 19:57:58 <_ikke_> The ideal situation is to get the patches upstream 2017-10-30 19:58:05 The whole reason that Arch is so effective in maintaining updated packages is that they do not apply patches, unless truly necessary. 2017-10-30 19:58:38 This results in just having to update version numbers. 2017-10-30 19:58:47 And most of the time, that is enough 2017-10-30 19:58:50 misz1: so.... uh, this isn't alpine's fault/problem 2017-10-30 19:59:16 the patches exist, they just need to get upstreamed if anything, 2017-10-30 19:59:33 Not, necessarly. Although, the decision to use musl, which I completly agreee with, puts Alpine at a disadvantage. 2017-10-30 20:00:05 <_ikke_> misz1: On the other hand it's an advantage 2017-10-30 20:00:18 @_ikke_ Indeed 2017-10-30 20:00:33 <_ikke_> And they're willing to take the burden 2017-10-30 20:00:46 misz1: so, I disagree, the way I see it is "if someone really wants to use the package, they can volunteer their time to the project to help keep it up to date, or to help upstream the needed patches" 2017-10-30 20:01:01 But maybe not "Unmaintained packages availible in repository" good 2017-10-30 20:01:20 meh, alpine isn't the only distro with that problem 2017-10-30 20:01:35 @Elizabeth I know! 2017-10-30 20:01:42 <_ikke_> What Alpine could use is people who help maintain packages 2017-10-30 20:01:48 <_ikke_> the more people help, the easier it'll become 2017-10-30 20:02:13 How do I volunteer? 2017-10-30 20:02:20 (Probably on wiki).... 2017-10-30 20:02:44 <_ikke_> misz1: Easiest is by probiding pull requests on github 2017-10-30 20:02:58 if you want to volunteer, easiest way is to send pull requests to github 2017-10-30 20:03:03 <_ikke_> :-) 2017-10-30 20:03:14 Oh, that was easier than I thought 2017-10-30 20:04:12 misz1: https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/tree/master/testing/lightdm 2017-10-30 20:04:22 But, github is only a mirror of the official repo. 2017-10-30 20:04:35 And there are alot of PR's there 2017-10-30 20:04:54 <_ikke_> Ah, it's in testing, so that means it's not even in the official repos 2017-10-30 20:06:01 Yes, in testing. But a version from 2014? It seems to be a weird way of testing? 2017-10-30 20:07:32 <_ikke_> testing means it's waiting for feedback from end-users 2017-10-30 20:07:48 <_ikke_> and as it's not in the official repo's, there is no real pressure to keep it up-to-date 2017-10-30 20:08:22 Hm. 2017-10-30 20:08:42 <_ikke_> misz1: So if you want to use it, your feedback is more than welcome 2017-10-30 20:09:05 But most users, that do not have sufficient knowledge about the linux system, will not even be able to run it. 2017-10-30 20:09:46 There is no package for any lightdm-greeter's. So it is impossible to run lightdm, as it is presented in the repo. 2017-10-30 20:10:06 <_ikke_> Running a graphical environment in Alpine probably already required more than average linux knowledge 2017-10-30 20:10:34 Most users will get frustrated, utter some harsh words and will go on to installing slim. A DM, that has been completly unmaintained since its death. 2017-10-30 20:11:07 <_ikke_> Most people will probably run lxdm 2017-10-30 20:11:11 And, I might add. That is a well known fact. 2017-10-30 20:11:35 True. 2017-10-30 20:11:41 <_ikke_> And due to Adelie, kde is being ported to Alpine as well 2017-10-30 20:12:40 misz1: there's a greeter package in unmaintained 2017-10-30 20:13:42 misz1: https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/unmaintained/lightdm-gtk-greeter/APKBUILD 2017-10-30 20:14:19 Oh, did not see that in the search results 2017-10-30 20:14:29 <_ikke_> Unmaintained is never built 2017-10-30 20:14:36 <_ikke_> you need to look into aports 2017-10-30 20:22:53 can't get telegram-purple to install 2017-10-30 20:23:21 fails at Package 'purple', required by 'virtual:world', not found 2017-10-30 20:23:25 but libpurple is installed 2017-10-30 20:24:29 <_ikke_> I don't see anything called telegram-purple in the repos 2017-10-30 20:24:40 misz1: hi 2017-10-30 20:24:50 <_ikke_> realies: where did you get it from? 2017-10-30 20:24:52 sorry for not beeing able to maintain all the packages... 2017-10-30 20:25:13 alpine has kind of exploded in popularity the last 2-3 years 2017-10-30 20:25:37 _ikke_, https://github.com/majn/telegram-purple 2017-10-30 20:25:46 and the process of on-boarding new devs has not followed 2017-10-30 20:26:01 <_ikke_> realies: did you build the package yourself? 2017-10-30 20:26:30 misz1: im am working on bumping alot of the packages this week 2017-10-30 20:26:54 yes, this is the output https://dpaste.de/hFJT/raw 2017-10-30 20:27:52 realies: i think you need makedepends="pc:purple" 2017-10-30 20:28:08 or libburple-dev 2017-10-30 20:29:15 ncopa, where does makedepends go to? 2017-10-30 20:29:28 trying with libburple-dev now 2017-10-30 20:58:28 ncopa, not finding libpurple-dev 2017-10-30 20:58:49 where is makedepends="pc:purple" supposed to be insterted? 2017-10-30 21:00:00 s/insterted/inserted 2017-10-30 21:00:31 <_ikke_> realies: that is meant for an APKBUILD file, but not sure you have one 2017-10-30 21:01:00 _ikke_, don't think so 2017-10-30 21:01:12 <_ikke_> realies: Is easier if you have one though 2017-10-30 21:01:31 why? 2017-10-30 21:01:48 <_ikke_> exactly the problem you are having 2017-10-30 21:01:55 <_ikke_> you can easier specify your dependencies 2017-10-30 21:02:17 can you not insert it inline? 2017-10-30 21:02:18 <_ikke_> Not sure why, but apparently it's actually checking for a package 2017-10-30 21:10:40 so you can't do it inline? 2017-10-30 21:11:34 <_ikke_> realies: inline where? 2017-10-30 21:12:12 as a parameter to make? 2017-10-30 21:12:17 or env 2017-10-30 21:13:39 <_ikke_> makedepends is something APKBUILD specific 2017-10-30 21:13:43 <_ikke_> make does not know it 2017-10-30 21:17:37 https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/APKBUILD_examples:Simple 2017-10-30 21:17:43 is that what i need? 2017-10-30 21:18:07 <_ikke_> YEs 2017-10-30 21:18:26 <_ikke_> But I suspect you also need a package called purple 2017-10-30 21:19:26 <_ikke_> You can use newapkbuild to create one 2017-10-30 21:19:37 <_ikke_> add -a to get the autotools setup already in there 2017-10-30 21:19:45 libpurple is the pidgin backend 2017-10-30 21:21:26 _ikke_, is that gonna make it pretend that purple is installed? 2017-10-30 21:21:49 realies: oh, i assumed you were working on a package 2017-10-30 21:21:59 scv, libpurple is installed 2017-10-30 21:22:03 apk add liburple-dev 2017-10-30 21:22:14 ncopa, no, trying to put together a docker image 2017-10-30 21:22:30 libpurple-dev or whatever package that as purple.pc 2017-10-30 21:22:41 ncopa, liburple-dev is not in the 3.6 repo 2017-10-30 21:22:52 you could also do 2017-10-30 21:22:55 $ apk search pc:purple 2017-10-30 21:22:55 pidgin-dev-2.12.0-r2 2017-10-30 21:22:57 apk add pc:purple 2017-10-30 21:22:57 my bad 2017-10-30 21:23:01 was just saying there is no package 'purple' as far as i know, libpurple is backend to pidgin 2017-10-30 21:23:02 yeah 2017-10-30 21:23:14 pidgin-dev was the correct package 2017-10-30 21:23:28 using apk add pc:purlple you let apk find the package for you 2017-10-30 21:23:41 ok i gotta get some sleep 2017-10-30 21:23:47 c u 2017-10-30 21:23:51 see you tomorrow 2017-10-30 21:23:53 <_ikke_> what is the pc: prefix? 2017-10-30 21:24:01 <_ikke_> pkgconfig? 2017-10-30 21:24:09 it asks apk to search by pkgconf provider yes 2017-10-30 21:24:13 <_ikke_> right 2017-10-30 21:27:09 <_ikke_> I wonder, why would configure talk about package virtual:world? 2017-10-30 21:32:48 _ikke_: pkgconf uses a similar dependency resolution strategy as apk does. the packages given on the command line are added as requirements to a `virtual:world` package 2017-10-30 21:33:22 <_ikke_> ah ok 2017-10-31 02:51:35 arent you going to add a megatools package? 2017-10-31 03:40:36 can I have both versions of fuse installed? 3.x.x and 2.x.x?? 2017-10-31 07:36:08 Hi, how can i solve this issue? Feb 26 06:18:46 streaming kern.alert kernel: [ 107.204980] grsec: From 192.168.1.100: denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0 for /tmp/prooted-2904-uGy3nM[FXServer:2907] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0, parent /home/neckro/server/proot[proot: 2017-10-31 07:37:20 neckro: that's a harmless warning 2017-10-31 07:37:29 grsec just logs an event that otherwise would not be loggedcx 2017-10-31 07:37:31 *logged 2017-10-31 07:37:40 if you really want to disable the warning, there's a sysctl toggle for it 2017-10-31 07:39:25 proot is exiting with error 11. 2017-10-31 07:39:41 proot info: pid 2952: terminated with signal 11 2017-10-31 07:40:16 and in messseges i get that error about rlimit_core 2017-10-31 07:40:42 so you're getting a segfault 2017-10-31 07:40:53 the error is just saying that the program crashed but couldn't write a coredump file (which is normal) 2017-10-31 07:40:57 the reason for it crashing is unrelated 2017-10-31 07:42:47 hmm.. then can be the FXServer problem i`m try to run. 2017-10-31 07:46:37 ryonaloli, can you please tell me what sysctl is handling rlimit_core? i`m keep looking on internet but no success. Thank you. 2017-10-31 07:48:07 something with resource in the name 2017-10-31 07:48:28 kernel.grsecurity.resource_logging 2017-10-31 07:48:34 at least on my system (gentoo, not alpine) 2017-10-31 07:49:13 Thank you!! 2017-10-31 07:49:17 np 2017-10-31 09:16:18 <_ikke_> You can also set it with ulimit 2017-10-31 10:08:43 _ikke_ thank you, but i reinstalled vanilla and everything is working flowless :D 2017-10-31 14:17:51 hi 2017-10-31 14:18:04 anybody online? 2017-10-31 14:18:17 hey, for now 2017-10-31 14:18:21 what's up? 2017-10-31 14:18:38 hi 2017-10-31 14:18:59 :) i'm feeling brave ... so i am trying to get current alpine to boot on a Soekris net4801 from CF 2017-10-31 14:19:44 serial connection works, but i'm dropped to an emergency shell ... and from there I cannot see the block devices 2017-10-31 14:20:04 oh, i think i know whats wrwong 2017-10-31 14:20:14 the mmc driver is missing 2017-10-31 14:20:19 from initramfs 2017-10-31 14:20:52 ncopa: maybe. but there's also an ide harddisk installed ... and that one is 'invisible' too 2017-10-31 14:21:22 then the driver for that is missing too 2017-10-31 14:21:40 try: lsmod | grep mmc 2017-10-31 14:25:22 i'll check. getting into the initramfs means that i am not missing cpu support in the kernel, right? 2017-10-31 14:26:11 i'm asking, because that was the issue back when i booted freebsd - for the GEODE cpu option had to be compiled in first. 2017-10-31 14:26:40 also, among the last lines before emergency shell right now i get: [ 11.648009] microcode: no support for this CPU vendor 2017-10-31 14:29:46 as you expected. modprobe: module mmc not found in modules.dep 2017-10-31 14:31:07 how did you install it? 2017-10-31 14:31:11 with setup-alpine? 2017-10-31 14:31:30 if you used setup-alpine, then its a bug 2017-10-31 14:32:33 ncopa: yes. i followed the automated section of https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Create_a_Bootable_Compact_Flash\#Automated 2017-10-31 14:33:29 i'll make a copy of the cf contents in order to inspect on my main machine 2017-10-31 14:33:39 i found this: https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_Alpine_on_Soekris_net4xxx 2017-10-31 14:33:47 which is sort of ancient... 2017-10-31 14:33:49 alpine 1.7 2017-10-31 14:34:17 qoh: apparently it was possible to boot alpine on soekris 10 years ago :) 2017-10-31 14:34:30 i'm sure it still is :D 2017-10-31 14:35:29 i have these in the main dir of the CF: apks boot ldlinux.c32 ldlinux.sys 2017-10-31 14:36:03 hum 2017-10-31 14:36:34 i think you need to create the boot/initramfs 2017-10-31 14:36:34 and these in /boot: config-hardened initramfs-hardened modloop-hardened syslinux System.map-hardened vmlinuz-hardened 2017-10-31 14:37:24 gunzip -c boot/initramfs-hardened | cpio -t | grep mmc 2017-10-31 14:37:32 i suspect we dont ship the mmc driver there 2017-10-31 14:37:49 can the soekris boot from usb? 2017-10-31 14:38:40 if you could boot it from usb, then you may be able to run update-kernel with mmc enabled 2017-10-31 14:39:08 no it can't. command running 2017-10-31 14:39:35 just to compare: what would the module for IDE harddisk be named? 2017-10-31 14:40:54 it appears to be there: lib/modules/4.9.32-0-hardened/kernel/drivers/mmc 2017-10-31 14:42:22 ... and in config-hardened there's CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK=m 2017-10-31 14:45:58 this SE question has detailed outputs from the boot: https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/401375/12169 2017-10-31 14:59:35 ncopa: in syslinux.cfg i have APPEND alpine_dev=usbdisk:vfat modules=loop,squashfs,sd-mod,usb-storage quiet nomodeset console=ttyS0,9600 2017-10-31 15:00:01 would i have to name mmc there? or is this 'modules' declaration about something else? 2017-10-31 15:00:13 i'll try :) 2017-10-31 15:00:22 the problem is that the mmc kernel module is not included in the boot/initramfs-hardened 2017-10-31 15:01:59 ncopa: but it is. it showed when did the gunzip command 2017-10-31 15:02:13 oh, it did? 2017-10-31 15:02:30 then it should be enough to add mmc to the modules=.... 2017-10-31 15:04:03 ncopa: just added it and tried. still not there 2017-10-31 15:04:26 can you do: modprobe mmc 2017-10-31 15:04:30 at the emergency shell? 2017-10-31 15:05:13 ... with same result as before: 'modprobe: module mmc not found in modules.dep' 2017-10-31 15:05:21 huh 2017-10-31 15:05:51 syslinux.cfg apparently has all the correct references. like KERNEL /boot/vmlinuz-hardened 2017-10-31 15:06:02 find /lib/modules -name 'mmc*' 2017-10-31 15:06:04 and 'INITRD /boot/initramfs-hardened' 2017-10-31 15:06:19 should show the same as gunzip command did 2017-10-31 15:06:46 maybe mmc is on the IDE bus? 2017-10-31 15:06:47 ncopa: yes, it does 2017-10-31 15:06:56 and the IDE kernel module is missing? 2017-10-31 15:07:47 modprobe mmc_block works (but still no corresponding device showing up) 2017-10-31 15:08:07 ncopa: what's it called- the IDE module? 2017-10-31 15:08:34 that i dont know 2017-10-31 15:08:46 hum 2017-10-31 15:10:37 hmm the unpacked initramfs has a lot of modules named that are not in the emergency shell 2017-10-31 15:10:54 anything under 'lib/modules/4.9.32-0-hardened/kernel/drivers/mmc/host' actually 2017-10-31 15:11:07 maybe this about the specific vendor driver? 2017-10-31 15:11:36 try: lsmod | ide_pci_generic 2017-10-31 15:11:50 and ata_generic 2017-10-31 15:13:29 ata_generic is loaded. the other isn't available 2017-10-31 15:14:14 that might be the reason why you also dont see the other disk 2017-10-31 15:15:26 ok. the comments in config-hardened refer to the modules i am able to load as 'card' drivers. while the others - the ones that i am missing - are the according host controller 2017-10-31 15:15:53 still strange they're not in the lib/modules, no? 2017-10-31 15:16:03 otherwise i could try and manually load them 2017-10-31 15:23:00 found the modules when listing via 'modprobe -l'. loaded all of them. no luck 2017-10-31 16:16:46 starting to get a feeling that newer kernels simply don't support that hw anymore :/ 2017-10-31 17:21:45 generally support isn't dropped for devices in the kernel 2017-10-31 17:21:53 unless the devices are horribly broken 2017-10-31 17:25:22 mepholic: the closest thing i found to getting the hw to work on a newer kernel is this: http://debian.takhis.net/soekris/soekris.html 2017-10-31 17:26:42 but loading any of the supposed successor modules of the ancient ones does still not cause any additional devices to show 2017-10-31 17:46:24 qoh: try these "sd_mod uhci-hcd ehci-hcd ohci-hcd usb-storage" 2017-10-31 17:46:49 iirc, these and its depends are needed for any usb/mmc to work 2017-10-31 17:56:12 if it does, would be a great help in updating alpine wiki page 2017-10-31 19:17:50 hi, virt-install is not working for me on edge 2017-10-31 19:18:20 It says "ValueError: Namespace Libosinfo not available" 2017-10-31 19:19:00 installation of libosinfo and libosinfo-dev does not work 2017-10-31 19:21:37 duncan^: `sudo apk add libosinfo` worked for me in edge 2017-10-31 19:22:30 , needed to update 2017-10-31 19:22:40 Cheers! 2017-10-31 19:22:43 yw 2017-10-31 19:23:19 I think it should be a dependency. 2017-10-31 19:42:38 probably should; while it's a decreasing thing in Alpine, sometimes you still run into packages that don't have their deps correct 2017-10-31 19:48:50 and the reason for that is probably that package contributors might already have those dependencies installed and therefore miss adding them, I don't know 2017-10-31 21:04:46 could also be due to upgrade 2017-10-31 21:05:46 duncan^: i just pushed virt-install-1.4.3-r1 can you please verify that it works? 2017-10-31 22:58:46 ncopa: works for me. cheers