2025-07-08 15:18:32 ikke, ncopa, clandmeter: there seems to be some agreement on https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/docs/governance/-/merge_requests/1 ? Or at least no more feedback 2025-07-08 15:18:47 Maybe a plan to move forward 2025-07-08 15:19:32 Give it a read again each of you, press the "Approve" button if all goes right, or give feedback 2025-07-08 15:20:06 1.a I address feedback if there's any, and go back to step 1 2025-07-08 15:21:05 Merge it and deploy it 2025-07-08 15:22:38 Add the template to the Council repository 2025-07-08 15:23:06 Give this publicity in Mastodon and a blog post (maybe I can write this next week) 2025-07-08 15:23:52 5.? Do you want to add me to have permissions to merge in that repo? 2025-07-08 15:24:09 Move on with the next priorities :) 2025-07-08 15:25:11 Actually, seems we can close https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/3 in the process :) 2025-07-08 15:28:42 i can hava a final look late tonight or maybe tomorrow 2025-07-08 15:35:02 Thanks! 2025-07-14 14:17:11 ikke clandmeter: any further thoughts about https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/docs/governance/-/merge_requests/1 ? 2025-07-17 09:31:06 pabloyoyoista: im ok, approved sorry for the delay, didnt see ncopa already did :) 2025-07-17 09:31:16 ikke: can you approve also? 2025-07-21 17:51:01 DOne 2025-07-23 06:47:42 pabloyoyoista: the MR was merged and it was automatically published in docs.a.o 2025-07-23 10:03:00 Nice! 2025-07-23 10:04:09 Then we're now in the part 3 2025-07-23 10:05:49 Add the template to the Council repository: which is adding https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/-/project/30/uploads/5649ea15e1bab210ccdefd145930d0f9/NewDeveloper.md to .gitlab/issue_templates 2025-07-23 10:06:22 Give this publicity in Mastodon and a blog post (I'll start this week) 2025-07-23 10:06:22 Move on with the next priorities :) 2025-07-23 10:06:22 5.? Do you want to add me to have permissions to merge in that repo? 2025-07-28 13:22:38 Does anybody know if https://docs.alpinelinux.org/governance/0.1a/Policies/voting.html and https://docs.alpinelinux.org/governance/0.1a/Policies/update.html are reflections of actual decisions taken by the Council/TSC, or just placeholder hopes? 2025-07-28 13:22:58 As in, have they ever been implemented/used? 2025-07-28 13:23:45 If they haven't been put into practice, I'm considering removing them for the time-being. And add whichever details are needed once the TSC starts meeting more regularly and decide on such things 2025-07-28 14:01:23 pabloyoyoista: they were just ideas, never implemented 2025-07-28 14:03:14 ikke: thanks for that info 2025-07-28 14:03:18 I've now sent https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/docs/governance/-/merge_requests/2 2025-07-28 14:03:22 and https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/infra/alpine-mksite/-/merge_requests/107 2025-07-28 14:03:53 Some small minor improvements to the governance docs, and blog post to publicise the new developers' process 2025-07-29 13:34:14 hello there. I've recently created my account in Alpine Wiki, and i wish to contribute as a translator. Can anyone guide me about the good practices if i wish to make PT_BR versions of wiki pages, and possibly translations of the docs in the future? 2025-07-30 06:58:38 Unfortunately right now there is no coordinated effort for those kind of things 2025-07-30 06:59:07 I'm not sure if there are some documents, or if it's more or less up to the person doing the work, 2025-07-30 07:24:20 i think that most pages are out-of-date and not really have a lot of quality so translating them makes not a lot of sense 2025-07-30 16:47:58 achill, my earlier suggestion made on regarding this quality issue: "2025-06-25 16:30:07 ikke, can you consider adding Extension:ArticleRatings to our wiki.. i hope this will allow wiki users to give rating to wiki pages and help us focus on badly rated articles" 2025-07-30 16:49:52 meanwhile we should still welcome and facilitate donte to translate and make available wiki in additional languages.. 2025-07-30 17:07:19 i just fear that once we update wiki pages the translated pages still keep being out of date, and its not something we can fix or even notice 2025-07-30 17:17:35 translations are massive effort, and even english wiki is in terrible state 2025-07-30 17:20:05 there needs a way to identify and mark poor quality articles... since wiki content is for users, they should be able to rate the quality of articles 2025-07-30 17:20:59 tbh almost everything needs rework 2025-07-30 17:20:59 un/helpful buttons would be nice, star or number scale would also be good 2025-07-30 17:21:17 and it would be really great if there was like a recency check for article 2025-07-30 17:21:29 if it's not updated for a long time, it could display warning 2025-07-30 17:27:46 i checked through multiple mediawiki extensions and found ArticleRatings to be the best to help improve quality of wiki pages.. 2025-07-30 18:17:14 that's assuming people will use it 2025-07-30 18:18:21 (or a wide enough distribution where you could consider it representative of what most people are experiencing) 2025-07-30 18:19:46 you've been doing good stuff. where arch wiki succeeded early on was just having really good editors. 2025-07-30 18:20:00 there wasn't any magic