2016-12-10 15:44:29 clandmeter, how can I check build for aarch64 for https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/pull/595 2016-12-10 15:44:44 looks php5 nuild affected the same issue 2016-12-10 15:44:50 *build 2016-12-10 17:40:27 hi guys 2016-12-10 17:40:28 re: 2016-12-10 17:40:29 https://bugs.alpinelinux.org/issues/6430 2016-12-10 17:40:50 would be fine if i remove the -doc subpackage in perl-unicode-collate-doc? 2016-12-10 17:40:55 perl-doc already include it 2016-12-10 17:42:42 Umh 2016-12-10 17:42:49 a diff shows that they are different 2016-12-10 18:15:00 fcolista: I’d be imho better to just remove conflicting files 2016-12-10 18:15:28 fcolista: why does it install man pages for some test components anyway? 2016-12-10 18:16:50 jirutka, why you say "for some test components"? What you mean? It's a subpackage 2016-12-10 18:17:27 usr/share/man/man3/Test::Builder.3pm.gz 2016-12-10 18:18:01 that's done by perl 2016-12-10 18:18:07 not perl-unicode-collate 2016-12-10 18:18:23 aha 2016-12-10 18:18:56 i don’t understand what’s going on here 2016-12-10 18:19:13 does perl already bundle unicode-collate, or why it contains man pages for it?! 2016-12-10 18:19:45 That's the same i was wondering..that perl-unicode-collate is now part of perl-core 2016-12-10 18:20:07 But i didn't find a reference to it 2016-12-10 18:20:27 the only one is this: 2016-12-10 18:20:28 http://perldoc.perl.org/Unicode/Collate.html 2016-12-10 18:20:51 where the top of the menu mention Unicode::Collate as part oft the core 2016-12-10 18:20:58 nut i'm not 100% sure 2016-12-10 18:22:39 well, i think that when you remove -doc subpkg from some perl-* packages, no one will complain ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 2016-12-10 18:24:17 just the builder complains 2016-12-10 18:24:48 and also i don't know if the man pages installed by perl-doc are correct 2016-12-10 18:24:54 for perl-unicode-collate 2016-12-10 18:25:32 how to manage conflicts? 2016-12-10 18:26:05 why the builder complains? ofc, when you remove -doc from subpkgs, you must also delete /usr/share/man in package() 2016-12-10 18:27:46 fcolista: using https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/APKBUILD_Reference#replaces, but it’s not a correct solution in this case IMO 2016-12-10 18:28:05 one of these man pages is probably wrong 2016-12-10 18:29:03 yeah..and i think is perl-doc 2016-12-10 18:42:36 does anyone know if alpine has autoconf-archive 2016-12-10 19:06:47 jirutka, is there a way to test build under aarch64? 2016-12-10 19:52:11 andypost: if you don’t have aarch64 HW, then unfortunately not (yet) 2016-12-10 19:54:31 jirutka, sad cos if PR595 works I'd like to make MR to upstream 2016-12-10 20:07:09 andypost: well, i can try to merge it and we will see 2016-12-10 20:09:52 jirutka, would be great because php5 also have no aarch64 build for the same reason 2016-12-10 20:11:32 andypost: please add some explanation to https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/pull/595/files#diff-e713f68eaa54e3f26802a50e0dc11841 2016-12-10 20:11:49 andypost: i.e. what it’s trying to fix and maybe even that link to SO 2016-12-10 20:12:40 sure 2016-12-10 20:16:58 jirutka, updated summary 2016-12-10 20:19:40 andypost: I meant add it directly to the patch file, not PR 2016-12-10 20:20:07 andypost: sumary in PR is _not_ stored in git repository 2016-12-10 20:22:53 jirutka, what kind of comment makes sense? the same code just above for arm https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/Zend/zend_multiply.h#L71 2016-12-10 20:26:24 andypost: it can be the same text from your summary, just copied to the patch file, like in https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/testing/rust/llvm-with-ffi.patch 2016-12-10 20:26:42 does anyone know if alpine has autoconf-archive | asking this because punes can't build without it 2016-12-10 20:26:59 andypost: so when someone look at it later, (s)he can understand why is that patch here 2016-12-10 20:27:06 jirutka, got thanx! 2016-12-10 20:27:22 andypost: it’s also useful to add snippet of the build error that you’re trying to fix 2016-12-10 20:27:49 kazblox: I don’t see such package here http://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages?name=autoconf-archive&branch=&repo=&arch=&maintainer= 2016-12-10 20:28:05 kazblox: but I have no idea what autoconf-archive is 2016-12-10 20:28:20 https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ 2016-12-10 20:28:43 kazblox: I can google it… but I don’t know if it’s some binary or just m4 macros or what 2016-12-10 20:28:48 it's m4 macros 2016-12-10 20:29:03 m4/autoconf macros* 2016-12-10 20:41:01 jirutka, I used original patch 2016-12-10 20:41:23 jirutka, maybe add link to PR where the details are? 2016-12-10 20:43:31 andypost: I see now, this is definitely better; I’d also add link to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=70015 into the patch 2016-12-10 20:43:54 ACTION doing 2016-12-10 20:45:28 done 2016-12-10 20:58:08 here we go 2016-12-10 21:10:39 andypost: it works! \o/ 2016-12-10 21:10:47 yay! 2016-12-10 21:11:12 now it needs the same pacth for php5 and only readline left 2016-12-10 21:15:15 jirutka, does it makes sense to add this patch https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/pull/592 or better separate PR? 2016-12-10 21:18:34 andypost: do I understand it correctly that the patch fixes bug introduced in security release? 2016-12-10 21:20:01 jirutka, not, pr592 is just upgrade but php5 has the same issue with build under aarch64 2016-12-10 21:20:52 but php5 is currently built for aarch64 2016-12-10 21:20:57 jirutka, there's no php5 for aarch64 in 3.4 and 3.5 https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages?name=php%3F 2016-12-10 21:21:18 https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/main/aarch64/php5 2016-12-10 21:21:48 oh, misread 2016-12-10 21:21:58 only 3.4 missing it 2016-12-10 21:24:24 jirutka, then better separate pr after security fixed version bump 2016-12-10 21:25:34 i still don’t understand how we managed to build php5 on aarch64 if it contains the same bug as php7 2016-12-10 21:29:51 i should go sleep, don’t know why, but i’m very tired today 2016-12-10 21:33:11 jirutka, looks compiler was updated last month 2016-12-12 08:20:57 morning - happy monday! 2016-12-12 10:23:37 stuggling to install alpine-linux (in a xen hvm). anyone seen this? st.ilet.to/sd.png 2016-12-12 10:38:34 just noticed this st.ilet.to/zb.png 2016-12-12 10:39:51 <^7heo> ScrumpyJack: maybe it's related to any of the things I try to fix in mkinitfs 2016-12-12 11:35:22 clandmeter, ping 2016-12-12 13:35:01 Docker does not properly distinguish between numeric UIDs and string usernames. 2016-12-12 13:35:01 Local attackers could possibly escalate their privileges. 2016-12-12 13:35:02 LOL 2016-12-12 14:44:25 fcolista: pong 2016-12-12 14:44:34 hey clandmeter 2016-12-12 14:44:35 hi 2016-12-12 14:44:58 howdy 2016-12-12 14:45:15 Not bad :) So...terminator as you (probably) know doesn't work 2016-12-12 14:45:32 in orer to make it work we need keybinder3 2016-12-12 14:45:39 https://github.com/engla/keybinder/releases 2016-12-12 14:45:49 we have keybinder in main 2016-12-12 14:45:59 but it's compiled against gtk3 2016-12-12 14:46:22 *gtk2. While keybinder3 it's for gtk3 2016-12-12 14:46:45 I've it compiled in testing locally 2016-12-12 14:46:50 and terminator works 2016-12-12 14:47:06 http://tpaste.us/AyMx 2016-12-12 14:47:09 the question is 2016-12-12 14:47:18 how should we call it? It's keybinder3 ok? 2016-12-12 14:47:41 i'm following what we did with vte 2016-12-12 14:47:46 we have vte3 2016-12-12 14:48:04 do you think this naming is correct? 2016-12-12 14:49:32 i just got back from poland :) 2016-12-12 14:49:53 welcome back! 2016-12-12 14:50:00 Did you enjoy? 2016-12-12 14:50:15 kind of 2016-12-12 14:50:16 I've bisited Warsaw a couple of yrs ago, but i didn't like it too much 2016-12-12 14:50:26 wroclaw 2016-12-12 14:50:40 its nice 2016-12-12 14:50:53 very busy in the center this time of year. 2016-12-12 14:52:50 fcolista: im looking at fedora 2016-12-12 14:53:06 they have reguar keybinder and keybinder3 2016-12-12 14:53:32 yes, they are different. Also other distro does like this 2016-12-12 14:53:43 ok 2016-12-12 14:53:50 why? 2016-12-12 14:53:53 what is the difference? 2016-12-12 14:54:06 i see one has python bindings, and other doesnt. 2016-12-12 14:54:17 one is compiled against gtk2, the other one against gtk3 2016-12-12 14:54:25 s/compiled/supports 2016-12-12 14:56:26 right 2016-12-12 14:57:15 i was confused with python vs gtk 2016-12-12 14:57:20 np 2016-12-12 14:57:28 just follow what fedora does 2016-12-12 14:57:53 its also what ncopa suggested to me few times. 2016-12-12 14:58:00 btw, is he back already? 2016-12-12 14:58:26 no, afaik 2016-12-12 15:01:31 fcolista: so you will introduce new vte and keybinder? 2016-12-12 15:01:44 no, vte3 already exists 2016-12-12 15:01:51 i've just took it as example 2016-12-12 15:02:11 i thought vte was also an issue 2016-12-12 15:02:15 to say: we already have vte and vte3. Can we have keybinder and keybinder3 ? 2016-12-12 15:02:26 no, it's not an issue at all 2016-12-12 15:05:12 well, i have no idea how this all works together (im seeing 3 vte version in fedora, api related) 2016-12-12 15:05:41 in doubth following the naming fedora 2016-12-12 15:05:56 or else ask ncopa, he should be back soon. 2016-12-12 15:06:25 ok i got to go again. ttyt 2016-12-12 15:06:31 i need to push keybinder3 in community, though 2016-12-12 15:06:36 byt clandmeter 2016-12-12 15:06:36 thx 2016-12-12 15:54:14 wb ncopa