2025-02-01 00:19:15 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 16:08:53 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 16:13:00 \o/ 2025-02-01 16:13:09 It _was_ an MTU issue 2025-02-01 16:14:24 \o/ thanks for investigating 2025-02-01 16:33:16 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 16:34:44 hmm 2025-02-01 16:35:07 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 16:35:51 wut 2025-02-01 16:41:00 lesigh 2025-02-01 17:06:15 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 17:06:47 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 17:07:44 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 17:10:09 lol 2025-02-01 17:10:45 akin like banging it with a hammer 2025-02-01 17:12:33 lol 2025-02-01 19:33:03 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 19:46:05 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 20:31:47 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 22:04:12 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 22:15:15 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-01 22:37:47 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 03:47:52 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 04:14:21 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 04:21:45 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 07:44:03 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 11:51:19 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 19:33:16 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 20:42:54 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 21:26:57 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-02 21:51:57 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 01:24:08 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 01:56:01 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 05:57:39 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 15:17:55 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 17:09:05 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 17:22:46 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 17:50:31 fossdd[m]: any chance you could maybe look into it? ^ 2025-02-03 19:33:35 "fossdd: any chance you could..." <- sure when im back home 2025-02-03 19:33:53 fossdd[m]: okay, thanks! 2025-02-03 21:14:15 fossdd[m]: 3 - testatomic (Timeout) failed earlier, but test has since passed 2025-02-03 21:14:34 oh really 2025-02-03 21:14:48 yeah, took several tries it seems 2025-02-03 21:14:52 and im trying to build it in a riscv64 container on my amd64 machine :) 2025-02-03 21:14:58 but nice that it passed now 2025-02-03 21:15:29 (obligatory "i hate flakey tests") 2025-02-03 21:16:08 was already confused why it passed in CI and not on the builder 2025-02-03 21:16:16 do you need the initial failed build log? not much info there, but still have a copy in case you want ot 2025-02-03 21:16:51 s/ot/it/ yeah, thanks for looking into it nonetheless 2025-02-03 21:19:53 https://0x0.st/8K19.2-r0.log 2025-02-03 21:19:56 nah if it works i dont care :p 2025-02-03 21:20:01 lol okay 2025-02-03 21:20:13 but thanks anyway 2025-02-03 21:20:29 you're welcome 2025-02-03 21:37:16 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 22:03:52 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 23:41:36 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-03 23:56:26 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-04 00:12:27 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-04 01:11:39 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-04 11:28:49 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-04 16:45:00 chromium passed finally!!! 2025-02-04 16:45:03 \0/ 2025-02-04 16:45:06 \oi/ 2025-02-04 16:45:08 \o/ 2025-02-04 17:05:00 \o/ 2025-02-04 17:19:24 It's interesting it's the `gn` process in prepare that fails 2025-02-04 17:19:29 not even during build 2025-02-04 17:58:13 ah. any theory on what made it eventually succeed? 2025-02-05 13:37:12 i've got to run, will check later 2025-02-06 16:46:37 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 18:05:21 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 18:15:34 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 20:20:28 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 20:23:21 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 20:28:33 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-06 20:48:40 cely: seems lite sqlite3 has a soname change 2025-02-06 20:48:57 ikke: think the recent sqlite upgrade had some upstream changes and the lib is no longer -dev, but in -libs 2025-02-06 20:49:09 there was no soname change 2025-02-06 20:49:54 think cely might be afk at the moment, but left a message that if there is an issue, the upgrade can be temporarily reverted if need be 2025-02-06 20:50:36 It's looking for libsqlite3.so.0, sqlite-libs provides so:libsqlite3.so.3.49.0 now 2025-02-06 20:50:58 in 3.21 it was still so:libsqlite3.so.0 2025-02-06 20:51:03 So something changed 2025-02-06 20:52:14 I guess we should revert it for now 2025-02-06 20:52:29 https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/contents?name=sqlite-libs&repo=main&branch=edge&arch=x86_64 ah, thought it provided both 2025-02-06 20:52:49 yeah, whichever is more straightforward 2025-02-06 20:53:28 in which case they mentioned they'll look into it on return 2025-02-06 20:53:48 otherwise 498 packages need to be rebuilt 2025-02-06 20:54:34 with a soname change, yeah 2025-02-06 20:56:44 my understanding was upstream made some changes to the build system, maybe some libs got moved around, etc. 2025-02-06 20:57:12 yeah 2025-02-06 20:57:22 reverting gives us time to look for a good solution 2025-02-06 20:58:20 yeah 2025-02-06 21:04:05 ikke: thanks 2025-02-07 00:07:30 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-07 01:33:53 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-07 18:27:28 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-07 21:46:45 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 02:16:54 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 02:29:30 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 03:25:22 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 05:08:23 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 14:51:41 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 17:48:53 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 18:38:48 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-08 20:30:38 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 06:31:15 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 17:07:10 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 17:22:59 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 17:27:15 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 17:30:57 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 18:47:18 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 18:50:23 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 18:53:51 algitbot: retry 3.21-stable 2025-02-09 19:34:04 algitbot: retry master 2025-02-09 19:34:45 algitbot: retry 3.21-stable 2025-02-09 19:47:01 algitbot: retry 3.21-stable