2021-10-01 04:36:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-01 07:20:45 ikke: any idea why CI did not caught "wget2*: Has /home/... in rpath" 2021-10-01 11:11:55 algitbot: retry 3.13-stable 2021-10-02 04:34:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-02 14:19:44 nmeum: textrels ^ 2021-10-02 14:57:54 fun fun fun 2021-10-02 16:31:31 yeah, that's going to work better :) 2021-10-02 20:42:08 andypost[m]: ^ 2021-10-02 20:42:32 "Security problem NULL DT_RPATH" 2021-10-02 20:42:47 ERROR: py3-shiboken6*: Has /home/... in rpath 2021-10-02 20:43:09 https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/26066#note_183324 2021-10-02 20:43:19 btw not clean how to remove it 2021-10-02 20:44:56 You can remove /home/ with chrpath -d 2021-10-02 20:45:08 Not sure about NULL DT_RPATH though 2021-10-04 18:53:05 ikke: any idea why xdebug is not indexed after 40 mins https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages?name=php*xdebug&branch=edge 2021-10-04 18:53:27 I might or might not have had something to do with that 2021-10-04 18:54:06 the other mirrors are not syncing from the master mirror 2021-10-04 18:54:09 basically 2021-10-04 18:54:10 so it's known issue? I bet something weird with connection happening whole day 2021-10-04 18:54:38 It should be fixed now 2021-10-05 02:20:33 algitbot: retry 3.12-stable 2021-10-05 02:21:06 algitbot: retry 3.11-stable 2021-10-05 02:26:19 algitbot: retry 3.11-stable 2021-10-05 13:46:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-05 17:20:15 algitbot: retry 3.11-stable 2021-10-05 17:20:33 algitbot: retry 3.11-stable 2021-10-07 14:57:41 Wait, shit 2021-10-07 14:57:44 I pushed the wrong thing 2021-10-07 14:57:51 That was a wip thing out of my tree still 😒 2021-10-07 15:09:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-07 18:38:24 aaaaaa 2021-10-07 18:38:43 oopsi 2021-10-07 18:41:13 at least the build passes on s390x now ;) 2021-10-07 18:47:42 nmeum: honestly that first try should've worked. Maybe `$CARCH` had to be quoted? 2021-10-07 18:48:53 PureTryOut: nah, the original test(1) invocation has a non-zero exit status 2021-10-07 18:49:05 [ "foo" = "bar" ] && echo foo; echo $? β†’ 1 2021-10-07 18:50:17 Ah 2021-10-07 18:52:35 I only tested it with CBUILD=s390x, that's why I didn't notice locally 2021-10-08 12:14:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-08 14:08:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-08 18:27:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-10 13:51:51 maxice8: muon seems to fail on 32-bits systems 2021-10-10 13:52:01 looking 2021-10-10 13:52:37 failed: _Static_assert(sizeof(struct str) == 16, ""); 2021-10-10 14:00:16 maxice8: would be nice if the commit has the reason why it was downgraded included 2021-10-10 14:00:37 s/has/had* 2021-10-10 14:46:55 ikke: in general I think people could use the commit messages functionality more tbh. I see it more often when checking commits that do something different from the regular pkgver upgrade, lots of them don't have reasons in them 2021-10-10 14:47:19 PureTryOut: yeah 2021-10-11 14:24:39 checksums failure 2021-10-11 14:25:37 looking at it 2021-10-11 14:26:23 checksums work out locally 2021-10-11 14:31:23 Huh 2021-10-11 21:24:17 algitbot: kick master 2021-10-11 21:24:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-11 22:51:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-12 05:42:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-12 07:00:15 PureTryOut: subtitlecomposer is supposed to work on rv64? 2021-10-12 07:07:42 Uh depends if it's deps are available I suppose 2021-10-12 07:07:58 see the buildlog :) 2021-10-12 07:08:06 looks like its missing something 2021-10-12 07:08:33 Yeah the usual suspects 2021-10-12 07:09:04 Those aren't available currently because of rust -> polkit. So it can be disabled for now 2021-10-12 11:40:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 02:22:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 02:32:29 ikke: something wrong with x86 builder 2021-10-13 03:24:05 not clear > ERROR: https://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/community: UNTRUSTED signature 2021-10-13 06:29:01 algitbot: retry 3.14-stable 2021-10-13 15:27:49 algitbot: retry 3.13-stable 2021-10-13 15:28:32 algitbot: retry 3.14-stable 2021-10-13 15:32:21 ikke: somehow 3.13/3.14 ppc builder reported failure for nginx upgrade but no rebuild happened, it still tells apk database issues 2021-10-13 15:34:58 andypost[m]: https://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs/build-edge-s390x/main/nginx/nginx-1.20.1-r11.log seems to have succeeded? 2021-10-13 15:42:40 ikke: I mean https://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs//build-3-13-ppc64le/main/nodejs/nodejs-14.18.1-r0.log https://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs/build-3-14-ppc64le/main/nodejs/nodejs-14.18.1-r0.log 2021-10-13 15:43:17 andypost[m]: oh, sigh. read-only filesystem again :/ 2021-10-13 15:43:32 I guess I need to reboot that vm again 2021-10-13 15:45:22 andypost[m]: it's apparently building grafana-server 2021-10-13 15:45:33 But you said it did not rebuild nginx 2021-10-13 15:46:26 oh, the stable builder, sorry 2021-10-13 15:46:44 rebooting it 2021-10-13 15:47:47 thank you a lot! 2021-10-13 15:48:46 it can take a bit before it's back 2021-10-13 15:53:58 ikke: are builders for 3.13 and 3.14 different ones? 2021-10-13 15:54:20 andypost[m]: same host (vm) 2021-10-13 15:59:01 algitbot: builder is back 2021-10-13 15:59:04 andypost[m]: * 2021-10-13 16:27:46 algitbot: retry 3.14-stable 2021-10-13 16:28:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 17:42:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 17:42:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 17:42:06 lol 2021-10-13 17:42:06 )) 2021-10-13 17:42:21 :D 2021-10-13 17:42:38 the issue is a bit racy for sure, was able to reproduce it once locally 2021-10-13 17:42:45 btw pgsql passed! 2021-10-13 17:42:55 \o/ 2021-10-13 17:47:42 php7: so:libicuuc.so.67 (no such package): 2021-10-13 18:01:16 what's that about? 2021-10-13 18:02:24 which one? 2021-10-13 18:02:32 both the same error 2021-10-13 18:02:57 oh! 2021-10-13 18:03:07 well… 2021-10-13 18:03:11 dovecot also depends on icu 2021-10-13 18:03:19 but it doesn't have in any of its depends 2021-10-13 18:03:22 so it wasn't rebuild 2021-10-13 18:03:28 hmm 2021-10-13 18:03:49 we should have selected rebuilds based on so:libicuuc.so.67 2021-10-13 18:03:53 dovecot-fts-xapian 2021-10-13 18:04:08 looks like icu is not updated 2021-10-13 18:04:10 should icu-dev be explicitly added to dovecot? 2021-10-13 18:04:14 uloaded* 2021-10-13 18:04:52 dovecot doesn't depend on icu 2021-10-13 18:04:57 afaik 2021-10-13 18:05:04 but it links against so:libicuuc.so.67 2021-10-13 18:05:14 > apk info -R dovecot 2021-10-13 18:05:18 mps: http://dl-master.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/main/x86_64/icu-69.1-r0.apk 2021-10-13 18:05:37 hmm 2021-10-13 18:05:39 same problem with enchant2 2021-10-13 18:06:34 dovecot-fts-xapian makedepends="automake autoconf libtool dovecot-dev xapian-core-dev icu-dev chrpath" 2021-10-13 18:07:19 yes 2021-10-13 18:07:27 and it tries to install dovecot-dev to build dovecot-fts-xapian 2021-10-13 18:07:34 but that fails because docovet wasn't rebuild against icu 2021-10-13 18:07:50 How is it built against icu without depending on icu-dev? 2021-10-13 18:08:03 are there other -dev packages pulling in icu-dev? 2021-10-13 18:08:19 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 18:08:22 yes, probably 2021-10-13 18:09:02 https://tpaste.us/Mzj9 2021-10-13 18:09:06 this is my apk info -R output for dovecot 2021-10-13 18:09:09 > so:libicuuc.so.67 2021-10-13 18:09:15 ^ this is provided by icu 2021-10-13 18:09:27 β†’ dovecot needs to be rebuild 2021-10-13 18:09:30 enchant2 as well 2021-10-13 18:09:57 so icu-dev needs to be added explicitly (rather then depending on it implicitly0? 2021-10-13 18:10:32 oh, yes 2021-10-13 18:11:00 how the dovecot depends on icu-libs but icu-dev is not in makedepends 2021-10-13 18:11:48 I am bumping dovecot and enchant2 2021-10-13 18:12:16 the question is: is there anything else we missed? 2021-10-13 18:12:47 I should have not selected packages to be rebuild based on `ap revdep` 2021-10-13 18:12:51 nmeum: ohm sorry 2021-10-13 18:12:56 I was to fast 2021-10-13 18:13:05 hm? 2021-10-13 18:13:08 all good 2021-10-13 18:14:14 hmm, firefox should be 92.0.1 2021-10-13 18:18:14 nmeum: I can't get apk to give a list of packages depending on so:libicuuc.so.67 2021-10-13 18:18:42 I think that's because icu was already upgraded and there is no package providing so:libicuuc.so.67 2021-10-13 18:20:35 dovecot depends on postgresql-dev and that is how icu is pulled 2021-10-13 18:20:41 same for postfix 2021-10-13 18:21:41 but postfix is ok, it don't provide -dev subpkg 2021-10-13 18:22:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 18:22:24 I am working on a list of packages I missed ':D 2021-10-13 18:22:45 nmeum: it happens :) 2021-10-13 18:23:02 good oportunity to fix the dependencies 2021-10-13 18:24:00 is hafbuzz upgraded with icu-dev 69.1 2021-10-13 18:24:23 I have firefox 92.0.1 in branch 2021-10-13 18:24:49 yes 2021-10-13 18:25:04 part of b8e66e3c0eac83ea4e0873b0fefe90a1366b939a 2021-10-13 18:25:28 good, will push FF upgrade 2021-10-13 18:25:40 if rebase works 2021-10-13 18:26:27 nah, it doesn't work 2021-10-13 18:28:33 conflicts, or what is not working? 2021-10-13 18:30:08 conflict by rebasing 2021-10-13 18:30:30 will try later to look at changes and do it manually 2021-10-13 18:31:43 s390x hasn't rebuild enchant2 yet 2021-10-13 18:31:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 18:32:42 https://tpaste.us/aZ8N 2021-10-13 18:32:47 these should be the packages I forgot to rebuild 2021-10-13 18:34:44 ok the list has some issues with subpackages 2021-10-13 18:34:47 I am cross checking manually 2021-10-13 18:48:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 18:49:07 πŸ‘† that should be it 2021-10-13 18:49:14 (hopefully) 2021-10-13 18:50:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 18:50:39 looks like aarch64 is stuck with main/boost1.76 1.76.0-r2 2021-10-13 18:50:59 boost is always fun 2021-10-13 18:55:45 it's not stuck 2021-10-13 19:06:19 > /home/buildozer/aports/community/libreoffice/src/libreoffice-6.4.6.2/i18npool/source/calendar/calendar_gregorian.cxx:350:40: error: 'TRUE' was not declared in this scope 2021-10-13 19:06:25 > 350 | body->getTimeZone().getOffset( fR, TRUE, nZoneOffset, nDSTOffset, status ); 2021-10-13 19:06:30 looks like this file is missing an include of stdbool.h 2021-10-13 19:07:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 19:40:14 ok, lets hope it will pass builders 2021-10-13 19:42:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 19:51:18 mps: are you also working on firefox-lts? 2021-10-13 19:51:21 should be easy to adapt 2021-10-13 19:51:33 since firefox-esr is now on 91.X 2021-10-13 19:51:44 s/firefox-lts/firefox-esr/ 2021-10-13 19:52:14 nmeum: no 2021-10-13 19:52:20 ok, I will look into it then :) 2021-10-13 19:52:31 maybe could in a day or two if no one do this 2021-10-13 19:54:18 mps: btw you need to update the secfixes comment for firefox, no? 2021-10-13 19:55:46 and firefox 93 is out πŸ™ˆ 2021-10-13 19:57:38 yes, but I will ask maintainer first 2021-10-13 19:57:52 I just want it upgraded for now 2021-10-13 19:59:01 https://tpaste.us/ypOd 2021-10-13 19:59:08 this should be the list of CVEs for the firefox update 2021-10-13 20:06:36 yes, I know, but I'm busy with installing alpine on two new arm boards, preparing kernels with drivers and u-boot and testing these 2021-10-13 20:20:07 np, I will just add them then :) 2021-10-13 20:52:16 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 21:04:27 algitbot: kick master 2021-10-13 21:04:40 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 21:40:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 22:06:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 23:16:13 hm... > error: 'TRUE' was not declared in this scope 2021-10-13 23:16:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-13 23:42:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 00:20:04 one more >onfigure: error: Citus is not compatible with the detected PostgreSQL version 14. 2021-10-14 00:59:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 01:00:16 looks libreofice also needs upgrade 2021-10-14 01:14:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 01:43:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 02:08:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 02:10:58 btw boost1.76-python3 is in testing but calameres depends on it 2021-10-14 02:25:06 no! 1.76 in main and 1.77 in testing 2021-10-14 02:25:24 but somehow package in mian is not aliased 2021-10-14 02:25:30 *main 2021-10-14 02:28:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 02:42:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 03:02:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 03:20:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 04:18:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 04:19:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 05:50:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 06:06:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 06:10:25 widelands on riscv64 should be easy to fix 2021-10-14 06:10:28 just a missing include I suppose 2021-10-14 06:12:58 but mapnik not clear, looks boost again "/usr/include/boost/geometry/index/detail/algorithms/intersection_content.hpp:35:32: error: 'boost::geometry::strategy::disjoint' has not been declared" 2021-10-14 06:13:29 I bet because it using boost 1.77 2021-10-14 06:14:13 but wasn't mapnik built successfully with boost 1.77 in the past? 2021-10-14 06:16:54 nmeum: no, it's because boost in testing https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/testing/x86_64/mapnik 2021-10-14 06:19:42 ah, so it was previously build with boost 1.76? 2021-10-14 06:20:19 ah, you already changed the dependency to boost 1.76 2021-10-14 06:25:07 (sorry, i am working on automatic tooling for managing packages where we maintain patchsets, using git) 2021-10-14 06:27:10 nmeum: can you check widelands - I can't get the fix 2021-10-14 06:31:30 nmeum: here's tha me issue it somehow using boost 1.77 from testing but it's from community? 2021-10-14 06:31:45 *the same 2021-10-14 06:36:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 06:39:39 algitbot: kick master 2021-10-14 06:40:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 06:47:47 so yes, that's riscv builder behavior - it has testing enabled event when building community /cc ikke 2021-10-14 06:48:30 clandmeter: ^ 2021-10-14 06:58:52 morning 2021-10-14 06:58:57 whats the problem? 2021-10-14 07:01:10 andypost[m]: ? 2021-10-14 07:02:03 clandmeter: I used to commit few fixes for boost - because some builders picking boost 1.77 (testing) building packages 2021-10-14 07:02:45 I think something wrong with provide priority for boost aliases 2021-10-14 07:02:59 then 7677c4163fdb could be reverted 2021-10-14 07:03:04 ok, but its specific to rv64? 2021-10-14 07:03:23 last ont was on rv64 2021-10-14 07:04:01 and on x86-64 for reason http://dup.pw/alpine/aports/a88ceb641cb6 2021-10-14 07:04:49 i guess rv64 is still behind? 2021-10-14 07:05:24 no, it just finsihed http://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs/build-edge-riscv64/community/widelands/widelands-1.0-r2.log 2021-10-14 07:05:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 07:06:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 07:11:36 rv64 is really taking long to upload 2021-10-14 07:17:56 it's a lot to upload 2021-10-14 07:20:52 I bet the rest will pass over a time 2021-10-14 07:21:37 ok i still see traffic going out 2021-10-14 07:29:50 well, the rsync runs under qemu too :P 2021-10-14 07:30:21 was still pushing 2mb/s 2021-10-14 07:30:41 but i think it included tesserac 2021-10-14 10:25:14 So the ICU rebuilds are mostly done, I guess we can proceed with the libffi upgrade? 2021-10-14 10:25:47 ++ just need to dig why swoole failed 2021-10-14 10:26:12 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 10:29:06 ikke: I think it much safer to create -compat package and then upgrade 2021-10-14 10:29:29 for libffi? 2021-10-14 10:29:57 yes, kinda !25100 2021-10-14 10:31:13 Only for ghc? 2021-10-14 10:31:32 ncopa's idea was to build ghc with a bundled ffi? 2021-10-14 10:56:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 13:08:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 14:02:19 wtf armhf, the whole point is to build against libffi.so.8, so don't fail because of libffi.so.7 not existing... 2021-10-14 14:02:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 14:17:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 14:17:47 What.... 2021-10-14 14:18:41 Does anyone know why ghc keeps trying to pull in libffi.so.7? 2021-10-14 14:23:20 Same four cloudi on armhf πŸ˜’ 2021-10-14 14:23:26 s/four/for/ 2021-10-14 14:31:13 And java-jna on armv7... 2021-10-14 15:05:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 15:08:10 Yeah it just keeps trying to pull in the old version... 2021-10-14 15:08:22 Oh wait. openjdk8 2021-10-14 15:08:50 I guess that needs to be rebuilt as well 2021-10-14 15:09:36 It doesn't seem to depend on libffi though? 2021-10-14 15:10:00 ACTION sent a code block: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/NLkOhhvlyUuWdDRPayWdQjts 2021-10-14 15:10:11 ^ from openjdk8 build log 2021-10-14 15:10:59 and I don't see it with apk info -R openjdk8 either 2021-10-14 15:11:11 openjdk8-jre-base.. 2021-10-14 15:11:30 that one neitehr 2021-10-14 15:11:31 Yeah so why does it pull it in at all? 2021-10-14 15:14:06 hmm, on armv7, openjdk8-jre-base does depend on so:libffi.so.7 2021-10-14 15:14:54 https://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs/build-edge-armv7/community/openjdk8/openjdk8-8.302.08-r1.log 2021-10-14 15:20:37 Only on armv7? Interesting 2021-10-14 15:21:02 (1/249) Installing libffi (3.3-r2) 2021-10-14 15:21:14 Well in that case I'll push a rebuild 2021-10-14 15:23:13 ... 2021-10-14 15:23:24 turtles, all the way down 2021-10-14 15:23:42 openjdk7 apparently also needs to be rebuilt 2021-10-14 15:25:44 PureTryOut: can you bump openjdk7 as well while you're at it? 2021-10-14 15:40:06 Sure 2021-10-14 15:40:09 Oh nvm 2021-10-14 15:40:10 lol 2021-10-14 15:40:23 I suppose every openjdk version needs a rebuild? 2021-10-14 15:40:33 v7 is the oldest 2021-10-14 15:40:38 not sure about newer ones 2021-10-14 15:41:12 Actually newer versions don't have 32-bit support anyway 2021-10-14 15:41:30 So it's probably fine 2021-10-14 15:42:05 yeah 2021-10-14 15:42:09 armv7 only has 7 and 8 2021-10-14 15:45:43 uhh 2021-10-14 15:46:52 it needs to depend on the versioned boost packages 2021-10-14 15:58:34 Oh that's interesting. ghc requires itself to build? And the older version still uses libffi.so.7 of course 2021-10-14 15:59:40 ahuh 2021-10-14 16:00:10 that's why andypost[m] suggested adding libffi3.3-compat 2021-10-14 16:00:57 Maybe that's the easiest option for now, ncopa's long-term suggestion is having ghc statically built against libffi or using a vendored version 2021-10-14 16:07:35 yeah I suppose 2021-10-14 16:09:28 If we have libffi3.3-compat, which provides libffi.so.7, but let ghc still depend on libffi-dev, it should be built against the newest libffi, right? 2021-10-14 16:15:01 in theory yes πŸ˜› 2021-10-14 16:15:10 But maybe not actually... 2021-10-14 16:15:31 Testing it locally 2021-10-14 16:15:39 Actually no that should work 2021-10-14 16:15:50 Yeah, in my head, it should work as well 2021-10-14 16:15:53 It would pull in both libffi.so.7 and libffi.so.8, but libffi.so would point to libffi.so.8 so should be fine 2021-10-14 16:15:58 yes 2021-10-14 16:16:01 exactly 2021-10-14 16:16:33 Luckily both ffi versions can be installed alongside each other 2021-10-14 16:16:46 There are other packages where it would be way harder 2021-10-14 16:19:32 yeah, I can imagine 2021-10-14 16:19:49 hmm, one test fails 2021-10-14 16:20:14 FAIL: libffi.complex/cls_align_complex_float.c (test for excess errors) 2021-10-14 16:34:00 Oh that's not too bad tbh 2021-10-14 16:34:07 But still annoying for just a dep upgrade 2021-10-14 16:35:23 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b64f44870960b1d321a911135687e332ab5d8ac5 2021-10-14 16:39:27 According to the Gentoo bug it linked too, that should work yes 2021-10-14 16:56:17 now it hangs on a different test :/ 2021-10-14 17:03:03 ok, just patience 2021-10-14 17:03:38 I can not install ghc locally 2021-10-14 17:03:42 let's see if I can build it 2021-10-14 17:48:26 ghc fails with newer ffi 2021-10-14 20:38:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 20:39:58 andypost[m]: I've picked your libffi3.3-compat package for ghc 2021-10-14 20:40:33 yeah, I'm checking logs right now 2021-10-14 20:41:12 I'm about to push it 2021-10-14 20:41:30 it looks strange that some packages require older version 2021-10-14 20:41:35 I need to do some manual fixing on the builder, because ghc requires libffi-dev as well, which conflicts with libffi3.3-compat-dev 2021-10-14 20:41:52 You mean ghc? 2021-10-14 20:42:04 yes, and pypy above 2021-10-14 20:42:17 these are all package that depend on themselves 2021-10-14 20:42:35 so they need to install an existing version of themselves to build a new version 2021-10-14 20:42:45 and the existing version still depends on the old version of the lib 2021-10-14 20:43:06 ah... :facepalm: I totally missed that ability, then transitional package required 2021-10-14 20:43:14 yup 2021-10-14 20:47:07 perl-glib-object-introspection has test failures 2021-10-14 21:04:21 ikke: It's not clear why it fails but surely it can't be disabled 2021-10-14 21:04:57 maybe mps could take a look... 2021-10-14 21:05:38 he already did 2021-10-14 21:05:47 see #-devel 2021-10-14 21:07:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-14 21:08:09 andypost[m]: yes, it could be fixed probably by changing format specifiers in gperl-i11n-marshal-interface.c in 3 places 2021-10-14 21:08:28 but I'm really not in good shape to do this now 2021-10-14 21:09:16 if no one have time and will I will look tomorrow 2021-10-14 21:12:48 mps: thank you I will try to make a patch 2021-10-14 21:15:10 as someone told somewhere 'int' in posix should be 'unsigned' by default, but it too late for change 2021-10-14 21:18:21 fixing ghc ^ 2021-10-14 21:28:04 btw !20134 also fails on 86-64 2021-10-14 21:29:19 test failures 2021-10-14 21:34:45 mps: do you mean that depending on 32/64 bits messages should use "ul" and "ui" 2021-10-14 21:35:34 it's vary "unsigned int" vs "long unsigned int" 2021-10-14 21:37:25 it does not fix tests 2021-10-14 21:37:45 yes, I think '%u' would fix last two 2021-10-14 21:38:15 unsigned int 2021-10-14 21:39:27 I don't know what is I32, probably also int32 2021-10-14 21:39:54 yes, tests fails everywhere but warning only on 32-bits 2021-10-14 21:41:36 I got i can't get perl tests https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/perl-glib-object-introspection/-/blob/master/t/arrays.t 2021-10-14 21:42:39 where test 72) `Non-zero wait status: 139 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 92 tests but ran 72.` 2021-10-14 21:43:27 before saying good night I can only say 'disable check' for now 2021-10-14 21:44:04 good night, I'm really tired 2021-10-14 21:44:39 thank you! good night) 2021-10-14 21:54:17 ikke: so only ghc left? 2021-10-14 21:54:25 andypost[m]: I suppose so 2021-10-14 21:54:30 still building 2021-10-14 21:55:38 andypost[m]: for pypy we need !26176 2021-10-14 21:56:28 ACTION checking 2021-10-14 21:56:46 IIRC pypy is fast enough 2021-10-14 21:57:26 (pypy was first build using python2, but the pypy apkbuild in testing now builds from pypy-bootstrap (provided by itself)) 2021-10-14 21:58:28 and pypy-bootstrap is building python2 and uses this to build pypy - so there should no circular deps on libffi 2021-10-14 22:00:53 with libffi3.3-compat in the repo, it should work for now 2021-10-14 22:01:11 (just the libffi part) 2021-10-14 22:01:40 kk 2021-10-14 22:04:38 ok, ghc built 2021-10-14 22:30:12 ikke: there was missing cd in build() also formatted makedepends and updated MR 2021-10-14 22:30:37 not sure it applies patches right way but it works 2021-10-14 23:00:46 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-15 04:13:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-15 04:22:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-15 08:42:13 ikke: is s390x really building py2 all that time? 2021-10-15 08:45:08 How long 2021-10-15 09:13:50 Around 10h 2021-10-15 10:30:46 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-15 16:34:04 andypost[m]: thanks btw of helping out with these things 2021-10-15 16:57:24 ikke: np, thank for help 2021-10-15 17:03:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-15 17:30:22 andypost[m]: yes thanks, you been putting a lot of time in recently! 2021-10-15 21:51:29 Nice, boost upgrade for main went smooth 2021-10-15 21:51:38 still waiting for community 2021-10-16 06:05:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 06:07:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 06:15:15 Ariadne: https://tpaste.us/plzn test-suite.log 2021-10-16 06:15:48 ah 2021-10-16 06:39:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 07:01:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 07:08:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 07:25:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 08:26:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 08:28:04 huh, that url returns a 404, but abuild still tries to use it? 2021-10-16 08:28:17 https://distfiles.alpinelinux.org/distfiles/pev-0.81.tar.gz 2021-10-16 08:41:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 08:47:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 08:56:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 08:56:37 not sure why we build ipmi stuff for s390x but ok :) 2021-10-16 08:57:31 heh 2021-10-16 09:04:43 cp: can't stat 'libipmi_lanplus.a': No such file or directory 2021-10-16 09:14:33 Ariadne: maybe it requires openssl3? 2021-10-16 09:15:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 09:29:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 10:16:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 11:43:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 11:45:14 But x86_64 paased now ipmiutil 2021-10-16 11:45:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 11:58:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 11:58:55 sounds like a race condition in the build system 2021-10-16 12:24:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 12:27:03 Ariadne: maybe revert ipmiutil to openssl3? 2021-10-16 12:53:41 > Detected openssl-3.0 2021-10-16 12:53:54 the problem is ipmiutil thinks it is building against openssl-3.0 but in fact it is building with openssl 1.1 2021-10-16 12:54:58 gimme a sec 2021-10-16 12:57:26 ah 2021-10-16 12:57:54 it determines the openssl version to link from `openssl version` output, but abuild pulls in openssl-3.0.0-r2 and thus cmd:openssl is provided by 3.0.0 and the version output is 3.0.0 2021-10-16 12:58:37 why does abuild pull in 3.0? 2021-10-16 12:58:37 hmhm 2021-10-16 12:58:53 ikke: abuild depends on openssl 2021-10-16 12:59:10 yes, but shouldn't it now pull in 1.1? 2021-10-16 12:59:35 makedepends_host="openssl1.1-compat-dev zlib-dev" 2021-10-16 12:59:53 https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/blob/master/main/abuild/APKBUILD#L10 2021-10-16 12:59:58 > depends="fakeroot scanelf openssl apk-tools>=2.0.7-r1 libc-utils 2021-10-16 13:00:06 > apk info openssl 2021-10-16 13:00:10 > openssl-3.0.0-r2 description: 2021-10-16 13:00:11 > … 2021-10-16 13:00:19 hmm, right 2021-10-16 13:00:29 idk if that is intended 2021-10-16 13:00:46 our openssl 1.1 binary is usr/bin/openssl1.1 2021-10-16 13:00:55 and our openssl binary is the 3.X version 2021-10-16 13:01:27 I mean, I can fix the ipmiutil build by making it use the openssl1.1 2021-10-16 13:01:34 I think that was the next step that Ariadne mentioned 2021-10-16 13:01:41 what? 2021-10-16 13:01:48 renaming the openssl1.1 binary to openssl? 2021-10-16 13:02:51 should I fix the ipmiutil build or no? 2021-10-16 13:03:42 For now it should be fixed 2021-10-16 13:03:46 She mentioned next week 2021-10-16 13:03:46 ok, will do so 2021-10-16 13:04:07 might cause a few issue with a varity of buildsystems if openssl(1) is not the 1.X version though 2021-10-16 13:04:19 Yeah 2021-10-16 13:08:23 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 13:08:25 that should do 2021-10-16 13:08:45 πŸ‘ 2021-10-16 13:13:10 😌 2021-10-16 13:16:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 13:37:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 13:58:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 14:13:30 x86_64 is idle again, nice 2021-10-16 14:16:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 14:45:38 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 14:47:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 14:50:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 15:13:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 17:50:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 19:45:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 20:02:38 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 23:45:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-16 23:46:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 00:46:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 01:23:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 01:48:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 02:23:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 02:28:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 02:36:30 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 02:48:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 09:24:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 10:58:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 11:02:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 13:46:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 13:52:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 15:00:04 ikke: any idea why postgresql-bdr-extension can't find dist files? 2021-10-17 15:00:14 is there a way to reupload it? 2021-10-17 15:02:49 I thought I added it, but it was the wrong version 2021-10-17 15:02:56 I have found the correct version now 2021-10-17 15:04:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 15:05:32 humm, arm-trusted-firmware is in main, but it depends on gcc-arm-none-eabi, which is in community 2021-10-17 15:10:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 15:11:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 15:22:19 ikke: fix for asterisk !26502 2021-10-17 15:28:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 15:39:29 andypost[m]: the commit message indicates that you are just updating checksums, but there are more changes 2021-10-17 15:40:25 it fixes checksum on last commit from the branch 2021-10-17 15:40:39 the branch got 3 commits after 4 years 2021-10-17 15:45:58 ikke: do you mean I need to revert it to old commit? 2021-10-17 15:47:36 andypost[m]: no, but the commit message is misleading now 2021-10-17 15:50:15 ikke: guess it makes more sense (pushed) 2021-10-17 15:51:14 yes, it does 2021-10-17 15:51:21 now I understand the actual change :) 2021-10-17 15:52:19 edited MR description as well, sorry just waking up) 2021-10-17 15:52:24 np 2021-10-17 16:02:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:02:34 46/56 Test #46: libical-glib-component ...........***Exception: SegFault 0.26 sec 2021-10-17 16:02:37 yes 2021-10-17 16:02:50 #13092 2021-10-17 16:03:01 Seems like py3-gobject is segfaulting 2021-10-17 16:03:29 !26499 mentions object-introspection is affected 2021-10-17 16:11:16 does that answer your question? :P 2021-10-17 16:11:50 yes 2021-10-17 16:11:56 :) 2021-10-17 16:12:31 We'll see if that fixes libical as well 2021-10-17 16:14:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:14:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:14:51 Ariadne: And I guess we could try to build ghc with libffi3.4 now as well 2021-10-17 16:15:27 hmm, why is libtiff-dev not available ? 2021-10-17 16:15:32 ohhh 2021-10-17 16:15:36 version constrained 2021-10-17 16:15:42 92d38caa1ffb705300cbfe7d6330a4bdaaa12de9 2021-10-17 16:16:33 Ariadne: not sure if it makes sense to just allow any 4.x 2021-10-17 16:16:53 This comes up each release 2021-10-17 16:18:49 deal with it later 2021-10-17 16:18:58 there is a fork, hylafax+ 2021-10-17 16:19:01 which seems more active 2021-10-17 16:19:08 ok 2021-10-17 16:20:16 ghc still fails tests for !20134 2021-10-17 16:20:40 andypost[m]: is that using the new libffi version? 2021-10-17 16:21:14 ah, I missed that new build flags commited 2021-10-17 16:24:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:25:51 Ariadne: any idea what the issue with seabios is? 2021-10-17 16:26:50 seems to be caused by newer binutils 2021-10-17 16:30:54 :) 2021-10-17 16:31:30 nice when things are fixed upstream already 2021-10-17 16:33:02 ikke: ghc using libffi3.3-compat https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/20134/diffs#529211653bdec1a5d1b1a34a50e53872bf89e994_30_29 2021-10-17 16:33:56 libffi3.3-compat needs to die 2021-10-17 16:34:26 yes 2021-10-17 16:34:30 it was only a temp fix 2021-10-17 16:35:32 yes, and new rebuild requires to install old ghc (fii3.3) to build new one 2021-10-17 16:35:53 I can fix that on the builder 2021-10-17 16:36:10 and as 3.15 just building it could use newer 2021-10-17 16:36:24 ikke: please try 2021-10-17 16:36:41 ghc is in community, the builders are not building it yet 2021-10-17 16:38:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:40:15 404 2021-10-17 16:40:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:40:54 only 7.1.0.10 is available 2021-10-17 16:40:58 there 2021-10-17 16:41:29 i hate when upstreams do that shit 2021-10-17 16:41:32 yup 2021-10-17 16:42:12 andypost[m]: building ghc with libffi3.4 locally now 2021-10-17 16:42:16 see if it works 2021-10-17 16:43:10 grub is same issue as seabios 2021-10-17 16:43:20 ok 2021-10-17 16:43:27 I haven't seen libical failing anymore 2021-10-17 16:44:08 Yes, it has been built πŸ₯³ 2021-10-17 16:47:33 already working on community 2021-10-17 16:48:21 https://dl-master.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.15/main/ 2021-10-17 16:50:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 16:53:06 checking if external GSM devkit is installed as gsm.h... aconfigure: error: Unable to use external GSM library. If GSM development files are not available in the default locations, use CFLAGS and LDFLAGS env var to set the include/lib paths 2021-10-17 16:53:16 pjproject has a dependency on gsm-dev 2021-10-17 16:54:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 17:13:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 17:13:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 17:13:36 bootstrapping rust om armv7 2021-10-17 17:15:15 can i see what is in gsm-dev on 3.15 builder ? 2021-10-17 17:15:35 ok 2021-10-17 17:15:39 which arch? 2021-10-17 17:16:23 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 17:16:36 https://tpaste.us/Prab 2021-10-17 17:19:42 x86_64 2021-10-17 17:19:52 strange :D 2021-10-17 17:20:02 what does usr/include/gsm.h look like there 2021-10-17 17:20:44 also, maybe config.log 2021-10-17 17:20:47 from pjproject 2021-10-17 17:21:05 ... aconfigure: 2021-10-17 17:21:09 this is suspicious to me too 2021-10-17 17:22:25 https://tpaste.us/6WBB 2021-10-17 17:22:51 #include 2021-10-17 17:22:56 wrong include path 2021-10-17 17:23:33 no 2021-10-17 17:23:36 oh 2021-10-17 17:23:36 it tries gsm.h too 2021-10-17 17:23:39 below 2021-10-17 17:23:41 humm 2021-10-17 17:23:43 dunno :D 2021-10-17 17:24:36 so maybe gsm_create() fails? 2021-10-17 17:25:23 hmm 2021-10-17 17:25:56 nanabozho:~/aports/main/pjproject$ ls -alh /usr/include/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:25:56 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1.8K Mar 29 2020 /usr/include/gsm/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:25:56 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Oct 17 11:20 /usr/include/gsm.h -> gsm/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:25:56 nanabozho:~/aports/main/pjproject$ ls -alh /usr/include/gsm/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:25:57 aha 2021-10-17 17:26:08 the gsm-dev has no gsm/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:26:12 ah 2021-10-17 17:26:33 it's a symlink πŸ€” 2021-10-17 17:28:33 rebuilt it locally... 2021-10-17 17:28:36 nanabozho:~/aports/main/gsm$ apk manifest ~/packages/main/x86_64/gsm-dev-1.0.19-r0.apk 2021-10-17 17:28:36 sha1:d23dc664d1ee314d46a18b9cde60ca8a3a3a58b1 usr/include/gsm/gsm.h 2021-10-17 17:28:48 but yours doesnt have this file 2021-10-17 17:28:52 i wonder why 2021-10-17 17:29:43 TIL about apk manifest 2021-10-17 17:30:44 i think its going to be reworked in apk3 :P 2021-10-17 17:30:53 for gsm-dev, the output is empty with apk manifest 2021-10-17 17:30:53 but yes, it can be used to inspect apks 2021-10-17 17:31:13 then that means 2021-10-17 17:31:15 it has no files :s 2021-10-17 17:31:48 we can try to rebuild it i guess 2021-10-17 17:31:56 checking the buildlog 2021-10-17 17:32:32 make[1]: *** [Makefile:315: lib/libgsm.a] Error 1 2021-10-17 17:32:32 ranlib: ./lib/libgsm.a: error reading preprocess.o: file truncated 2021-10-17 17:32:32 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/buildozer/aports/main/gsm/src/gsm-1.0-pl19' 2021-10-17 17:32:32 make: [Makefile:343: gsminstall] Error 2 (ignored) 2021-10-17 17:32:52 maybe force -j1 during install 2021-10-17 17:32:53 andypost[m]: haskell with libffi3.4 now has just 1 test failure 2021-10-17 17:34:27 well 2021-10-17 17:34:32 it hasnt insta-died yet 2021-10-17 17:34:47 think we have a winner :) 2021-10-17 17:35:59 woot 2021-10-17 17:39:07 x86_64 done 2021-10-17 17:40:45 I didn't expect main to be built within 1.5 days 2021-10-17 17:43:49 :) 2021-10-17 17:47:21 Ariadne: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Vortex86-Linux-Detection 2021-10-17 18:07:44 minimal: :D 2021-10-17 18:12:46 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 18:14:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 18:20:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 18:25:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 18:50:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 18:55:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 19:02:06 andypost[m]: if you wait a sec, I can bootstrap these languages 2021-10-17 19:03:22 building on x86_64 and x86 now 2021-10-17 19:04:00 ikke: I thought you're blocking a builder for bootstrap, so retries does not affect, I do it for ppc 2021-10-17 19:04:38 andypost[m]: yes, but I wait until the builder is idle 2021-10-17 19:22:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 19:32:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 19:33:03 ^ cyclic dependency 2021-10-17 19:33:41 pipewire seems to depend on sdl2, while sdl2-dev depends on pipewire-dev 2021-10-17 20:33:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 20:43:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 20:54:45 go bootstrapped on x86 2021-10-17 21:13:17 ikke: any idea how to resolve elogind required polkit-dev but the kast needs elogind 2021-10-17 21:13:33 s/kast/last 2021-10-17 21:27:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 21:40:11 ghc also needs bootstrap( 2021-10-17 21:52:58 ikke: main is passed! 2021-10-17 21:56:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 22:04:36 exim needs upgrade, I filed !26514 2021-10-17 22:16:04 ikke: mercurial ^^ getting segfault 2021-10-17 22:44:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-17 23:52:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 01:36:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 01:39:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 01:49:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 01:58:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:00:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:00:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:03:37 Ariadne: libqofono failure looks ssl related 2021-10-18 02:05:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:06:48 grr 2021-10-18 02:21:19 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:21:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:22:38 i assume armhf is offline'd for rust bootstrap 2021-10-18 02:25:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:31:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 02:33:18 andypost[m]: libqofono is caused by server outage 2021-10-18 02:59:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 03:00:30 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 03:25:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 03:25:14 :) 2021-10-18 03:38:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 03:54:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 03:58:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:01:04 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:01:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:06:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:35:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:35:34 bootstrapping rust on ppc64le 2021-10-18 04:35:46 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:38:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 04:44:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 05:03:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 05:33:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 05:41:08 bootstrapping go on aarch64 and x86_68 2021-10-18 05:41:13 _64* 2021-10-18 09:27:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 09:33:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 09:57:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 10:11:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 10:12:39 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 10:13:26 build-3-15-s390x is stuck 2021-10-18 10:13:54 on python2 it seems 2021-10-18 10:14:34 all processes are waiting 2021-10-18 10:14:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 10:47:16 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 11:01:01 the alpine-keys will need to be backported for upgrade, unless we are not phasing these keys in for 3.15 2021-10-18 11:01:25 yes 2021-10-18 11:02:04 they are in use 2021-10-18 16:05:30 algitbot: retry 3.15 2021-10-18 16:05:35 * retry 3.15-stable 2021-10-18 16:05:46 algitbot: retry 3.15-stable 2021-10-18 16:07:36 PureTryOut: just use master) 2021-10-18 16:08:06 but 3.15 failed, not master lol 2021-10-18 16:09:34 the 3.15 builders track master until the release 2021-10-18 16:09:54 There is no 3.15-stable branch yet 2021-10-18 16:11:22 yeah but I wanted to let the 3.15 builder retry, not the master builder 2021-10-18 16:11:30 the 3.15 builders track master until the release 2021-10-18 16:11:41 yeah but I wanted to let the 3.15 builder retry, not the master builder 2021-10-18 16:11:44 :P 2021-10-18 16:11:50 That's impossible 2021-10-18 16:11:52 not sure why you're just repeating yourself lol 2021-10-18 16:12:06 how is that impossible? algitbot answered it was going to retry πŸ˜› 2021-10-18 16:12:12 It just sends a message 2021-10-18 16:12:16 it has no clue who answers it 2021-10-18 16:12:37 algitbot: retry foobar 2021-10-18 16:13:07 well judging by that response, it either knows the 3.15-stable branch or it's builders 2021-10-18 16:13:19 Probably just a regexp 2021-10-18 16:13:25 because there is no 3.15-stable branch yet 2021-10-18 16:14:01 that I understand. I do find it a bit weird that you're telling it to command a branch rather than builders but ok 🀷 2021-10-18 16:14:06 anyhow, until 3.15 is release, and 3.15-stable created, use master to trigger the 3.15 builders 2021-10-18 16:14:21 PureTryOut: that's how it works 2021-10-18 16:14:40 The builders track a certain branch, and you trigger the builders by sending a message for that branch 2021-10-18 16:15:13 ok 2021-10-18 16:15:21 ikke: I see at build.a.o build-3-(3|4)-armhf - how that possible? 2021-10-18 16:16:16 I don't see it 2021-10-18 16:17:59 ikke: I just opened firefox and see) https://i.imgur.com/7muALnz.png 2021-10-18 16:18:09 PureTryOut: to give more background: whenever you push commits to a branch, a hook (currently gitlab webhook) sends a message over mqtt that a certain branch has been updated 2021-10-18 16:18:29 that's what triggers the builders 2021-10-18 16:24:28 algitbot: retry 314.15-stable 2021-10-18 16:25:39 3.14.15?! 😱 2021-10-18 17:21:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:30:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:32:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:35:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:43:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:45:12 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 17:54:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 18:01:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 18:02:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 18:30:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 19:15:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 19:15:18 hmm, 403 2021-10-18 22:23:43 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 22:24:04 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 22:27:42 Filed #13100 for soundtouch 2021-10-18 22:27:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 23:01:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 23:04:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 23:06:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-18 23:10:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 00:31:04 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 01:16:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 02:57:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:13:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:16:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:19:58 lua-copas, could use to disable online test > Fetching: https://goo.gl/tBfqNu ==> 404 HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found 2021-10-19 03:20:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:21:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:22:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:26:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:31:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:34:12 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:51:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:55:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 03:59:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:04:06 http://build.alpinelinux.org/buildlogs/build-edge-ppc64le/main/ruby-augeas/ruby-augeas-0.5.0-r9.log 2021-10-19 04:04:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:14:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:30:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:31:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:34:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 04:41:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 08:55:42 Hmm, how to get out of the polkit -> elogind -> polkit circular dependency? Split out polkit-elogind again I suppose? 2021-10-19 09:02:02 I opened an issue for it and jirukta is looking for a solution 2021-10-19 09:03:53 πŸ‘οΈ 2021-10-19 11:53:51 ikke: looks 3.15 x86_64 builder hangs on hg failed test 2021-10-19 11:57:00 ValueError: Could not find output channel 2021-10-19 12:41:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 13:41:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 14:12:25 ikke looks edge-86_64 also hangs on test 2021-10-19 15:25:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 15:53:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 16:42:04 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 17:17:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 17:22:16 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 17:43:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 17:48:17 ikke: is armv7 builder has go bootsrap? 2021-10-19 18:59:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 19:00:01 hmm. 2021-10-19 19:43:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 19:43:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 19:45:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 19:50:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 19:54:17 andypost[m]: I suppose it makes sense to enable 'continue building' atm 2021-10-19 19:54:37 ++ 2021-10-19 19:55:54 ikke: I've seen that armv7 has no go bootstrap - that's for reason? 2021-10-19 19:56:27 andypost[m]: that needs to be manually installed 2021-10-19 19:56:32 from edge 2021-10-19 19:56:39 go cannot be built without go 2021-10-19 19:56:43 and this "git master branch warning" blocks !24713 2021-10-19 19:57:35 ikke: please copy saved version of source from edge for #13100 2021-10-19 19:57:47 andypost[m]: no other source available? 2021-10-19 19:58:00 bootstrapping go on armv7 now 2021-10-19 19:58:42 I've no idea because there's no author site, all other sources could be hacked 2021-10-19 19:59:34 https://www.surina.net/soundtouch/ links to https://codeberg.org/soundtouch/soundtouch 2021-10-19 19:59:52 You can use diffoscope to check if there are changes in the source 2021-10-19 20:01:47 ugh, codeberg 'hides' the archive urls 2021-10-19 20:01:51 booo 2021-10-19 20:02:32 They put it in a data-url attribute and use js I suppose to trigger it 2021-10-19 20:12:39 andypost[m]: the archives are nearly the same. The only difference is the root dir name 2021-10-19 20:17:42 ikke: then !26585 2021-10-19 20:17:53 algitbot: oh 2021-10-19 20:17:59 andypost[m]: I've already pushed it... 2021-10-19 20:24:21 andypost[m]: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/infra/docker/alpine-gitlab-ci/-/commit/17c925f630679556649fe11dbd538560c30b48fa 2021-10-19 20:29:45 go has been bootstrapped on armv7 2021-10-19 20:31:24 ikke: thank you, I mean my MR as upgrade 2021-10-19 20:31:36 I see you renamed it 2021-10-19 20:31:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 20:32:00 yep, needs to find soname changes 2021-10-19 20:42:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-19 20:50:52 ikke: can you check build-edge-x86_64 and ppc one - they running around 24h for event machine 2021-10-19 22:05:42 ikke: please check build-3-15-armhf - is it still testing? 2021-10-19 22:36:53 ikke: thank you, now it passed but looks s390 and ppc stuck 2021-10-19 23:22:17 yep build-3-15-ppc64le shows as idle 2021-10-20 03:18:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 06:50:48 hahahahahahahahaha 2021-10-20 06:50:58 i see we have put the builders into "fuck it" mode 2021-10-20 06:51:11 Just the 32-bit arm ones 😜 2021-10-20 06:51:21 why 2021-10-20 07:18:18 what 2021-10-20 07:18:28 I guess this is a backlog 2021-10-20 08:00:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 08:05:51 :D 2021-10-20 08:06:02 out of disk space 2021-10-20 08:07:28 ooh 2021-10-20 08:50:45 algitbot: retru master 2021-10-20 09:02:54 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 09:02:58 ikke: lol 2021-10-20 09:05:12 I restarted the builder proces anyway :P 2021-10-20 09:24:36 :) 2021-10-20 09:25:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 09:25:17 arent we missing 2 3-15 builders 2021-10-20 09:43:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 10:45:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 10:47:00 stuck on libtorrent-rasterbar 2021-10-20 15:12:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 15:29:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 15:38:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 15:58:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 17:27:39 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 17:29:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 17:30:25 ikke: build-3-15-x86_64 looks hangs more then 24hrs 2021-10-20 17:30:33 sigh 2021-10-20 17:31:30 maybe the saame reason as glib-networking fails 2021-10-20 17:35:31 andypost[m]: looks like the builder is not stuck 2021-10-20 17:35:54 andypost[m]: it's building linux-edge atm 2021-10-20 17:36:42 ikke: I thought you made something and it resurrected) 2021-10-20 17:37:34 ikke: build-3-15-aarch64 also builds rakudo since last evening 2021-10-20 17:37:41 build.a.o still retorts telepathy-glib 2021-10-20 17:37:46 reports 2021-10-20 17:38:23 yep 2021-10-20 17:39:28 maybe it just fails to report status 2021-10-20 17:39:52 yes, likely 2021-10-20 17:49:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 18:05:21 andypost[m]: ^ sorry, was looking at the wrong builder πŸ˜‘ 2021-10-20 18:12:49 sorry, that was me ^ 2021-10-20 18:31:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 19:02:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-20 19:15:39 andypost[m]: the builders should continue on their own 2021-10-20 19:33:15 ikke: great! interesting how they get new commits 2021-10-20 19:33:37 it's just an option to buildrepo 2021-10-20 19:33:39 -k -s 2021-10-20 19:33:52 -k means continuing after failure 2021-10-20 19:34:01 and -s means skip of src/ is present (so failed before) 2021-10-20 19:34:14 I mean I see build-3-15-aarch64: failed to build sphinx - but I pushed a commit to fix that 2021-10-20 19:34:30 andypost[m]: right now it will be skipped 2021-10-20 19:34:49 the goal now is to get as much packages built as possible 2021-10-20 19:34:52 a17cd7cc50125531a1f0996e8c62251b43e3404f 2021-10-20 19:35:20 later we will remove those options again to make it easier to fix packages 2021-10-20 19:35:47 great approach 2021-10-20 20:02:02 #13109 2021-10-20 20:44:13 ikke: git-interactive-rebase-tool depends on libgit ^^ in rebuild it went ok 2021-10-20 20:45:12 andypost[m]: with a newer version? 2021-10-20 20:47:57 no, the same failure https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/jobs/517044/raw 2021-10-20 20:48:30 messed with pipeline where it was skipped 2021-10-20 20:49:36 jirutka maintains it 2021-10-21 07:45:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-21 16:01:40 > error.OutOfMemory 2021-10-21 16:01:41 hehe 2021-10-21 16:09:47 nmeum: this in check() 2021-10-21 16:10:25 mps: the out-of-memory zig error? 2021-10-21 16:10:49 yes 2021-10-21 16:10:53 that's not in check 2021-10-21 16:10:59 this is a known problem with building zig1 from zig0 2021-10-21 16:11:09 it just needs an awful lot of memory 2021-10-21 16:11:16 no, I build it locally without check 2021-10-21 16:11:20 https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/6485 2021-10-21 16:11:48 ah you are right! 2021-10-21 16:11:59 disable check for now? 2021-10-21 16:12:06 maybe 2021-10-21 16:12:11 (the build output is very confusing) 2021-10-21 16:12:16 that what I thought 2021-10-21 16:12:28 we can just run fewer tests in check() 2021-10-21 16:12:46 and we will have to remove -doc 2021-10-21 16:12:58 why? 2021-10-21 16:13:08 also fails with same error 2021-10-21 16:13:19 sad 2021-10-21 16:13:24 yes 2021-10-21 16:13:38 well I guess we do that for now to unblock the builders and fix it later? (: 2021-10-21 16:13:45 something is wrong and I can't write on #zig 2021-10-21 16:14:06 they need +v mode 2021-10-21 16:14:36 and I can't manage to set proper authentication on libera 2021-10-21 16:38:37 nmeum: pushed changes to zig, lets hope it will pass now 2021-10-21 16:42:16 thanks 2021-10-21 16:42:20 πŸ™ 2021-10-21 16:52:43 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-21 16:55:01 hmm, we need to bump pkgrel even for failed pkgs to trigger build again? 2021-10-21 17:06:25 mps: no 2021-10-21 17:06:40 but the 3-15 builders are currently just continuously building and skipping failed packages 2021-10-21 17:06:54 We firs try to build as mutch as possible in community 2021-10-21 17:07:05 why then it doesn't restarted zig on edge 2021-10-21 17:07:43 seems like it succeeded? 2021-10-21 17:08:20 oh, true 2021-10-21 17:08:26 I was blind 2021-10-21 17:08:29 http://dl-master.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/testing/x86_64/zig-0.8.1-r0.apk 2021-10-21 22:31:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-21 23:56:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 02:09:46 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 02:30:42 hmm, interesting 2021-10-22 02:30:50 lvm2 does install usr/sbin/dmstats 2021-10-22 02:30:57 while device-mapper has sbin/dmstats 2021-10-22 03:22:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 03:22:49 uhh ok 2021-10-22 03:24:20 so, x86 is done? 2021-10-22 03:24:21 wtf 2021-10-22 03:24:41 no, its not 2021-10-22 03:25:15 how to get it something left? 2021-10-22 03:25:30 s/it/if 2021-10-22 03:38:38 im fixing mingw-gcc atm 2021-10-22 04:13:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 04:30:57 Ariadne: need to disable -s -k on buildrepo again 2021-10-22 04:31:39 can you do so on s390x and x86 please 2021-10-22 04:32:09 done 2021-10-22 04:32:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 04:32:30 huh 2021-10-22 04:35:03 argh 2021-10-22 04:37:08 mumble mubmle husky mumble mumble 2021-10-22 04:38:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 04:39:45 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 04:40:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 04:59:43 Ariadne: looks glib-networking should be fixed with !25577 2021-10-22 05:15:53 interesting. They say we should use gnutls because openssl does not return expected errors, but switching to openssl fixes unittest errors for us? 2021-10-22 05:19:25 yes 2021-10-22 05:21:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 05:28:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 05:40:00 amazing 2021-10-22 05:43:33 ? 2021-10-22 05:43:37 cargo issue/ 2021-10-22 05:53:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 05:56:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:03:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:08:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:10:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:10:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:21:34 Filed for opam !26645 2021-10-22 06:43:08 algitbot: retry 3.12-stable 2021-10-22 06:47:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 06:48:38 algitbot: retry 3.13-stable 2021-10-22 07:29:30 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 07:32:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 07:47:01 kea probably needs update 2021-10-22 08:59:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 09:00:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 09:02:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 09:14:17 build-3-15-s390x is stuck 2021-10-22 09:14:23 as is build-3-15-aarch64 2021-10-22 10:19:59 interesting. 2021-10-22 10:20:06 it gets stuck after the tests complete 2021-10-22 10:22:06 ikke: what process did you kill, exactly? 2021-10-22 10:30:12 Ariadne: there was only the make process directly under abuild, there were other orphaned stunnel processes I killed as well 2021-10-22 10:30:30 i wonder if -j1 would make it happier 2021-10-22 10:36:33 Ariadne: https://tpaste.us/8ERK 2021-10-22 10:36:35 this is on aarch64 2021-10-22 10:37:03 flaky testsuite? 2021-10-22 10:37:04 weird 2021-10-22 10:37:59 I now just killed make 2021-10-22 10:56:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 10:57:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 10:59:38 OSError: Unable to create dataset (no appropriate function for conversion path) 2021-10-22 15:42:44 !13110 2021-10-22 15:42:47 #13110 2021-10-22 15:42:57 One day I will learn the difference :P 2021-10-22 18:23:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 18:26:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-22 22:27:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 07:12:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 11:37:33 libtorrent-rasterbar keeps hanging during tests 2021-10-23 11:38:38 maintainer seems awol 2021-10-23 15:37:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 15:40:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 15:43:53 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 15:45:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 16:32:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 16:32:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 16:38:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 16:41:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:14:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:16:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:17:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:21:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:28:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:35:43 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 17:36:12 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 18:15:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 18:15:21 wait, why is that package added to testing? py3-charset-normalizer 2021-10-23 18:15:35 it's needed by py3-requests in main 2021-10-23 18:15:45 https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/26721 2021-10-23 18:15:49 andypost: ^ 2021-10-23 18:16:21 also don't use `$pkgname` or any of it's derivatives in `$source`. 2021-10-23 18:21:14 PureTryOut I did it to fix !26735 2021-10-23 18:44:56 ikke: is it community/libtorrent-rasterbar hanging or it takes really 2 days for its tests? 2021-10-23 18:45:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 18:45:50 andypost[m]: I already killed it earlier 2021-10-23 18:45:53 it's hanging again 2021-10-23 18:46:15 maybe just disable tests for now? 2021-10-23 18:46:52 yeah, I suppose 2021-10-23 18:47:17 I tried to upgrade it, but ran into more issues 2021-10-23 18:48:06 andypost: well please move it to main than rather than community 2021-10-23 18:48:10 As it's needed to fix py3-requests too 2021-10-23 18:48:14 it's broken right now 2021-10-23 18:50:33 PureTryOut: are you ok if I edit your MR? 2021-10-23 18:50:45 sure, as long as the end result is py3-requests fixed πŸ˜› 2021-10-23 18:50:54 doing 2021-10-23 18:52:18 thanks 2021-10-23 19:19:38 PureTryOut: I can't make tests even run, so many dependencies 2021-10-23 19:20:09 maybe some dependent package could be used as test... 2021-10-23 19:20:20 what tests? of what package? 2021-10-23 19:20:36 of py3-requests 2021-10-23 19:21:45 oh yeah I didn't bother anyway, it needs deps from community 2021-10-23 19:28:57 that py3-requests upgrade was messed up anyway, it had 2 checksum variables. I guess the author of that upgrade manually added it rather than properly using `abuild checksum` 2021-10-23 19:29:20 hmm 2021-10-23 19:29:31 and whoever merged it didn't do a good review 2021-10-23 19:30:27 !26709 2021-10-23 19:36:22 PureTryOut: I did check on py3-sphinx and requests are working 2021-10-23 19:36:40 yeah I did the same check 😜 2021-10-23 19:36:46 that's how I noticed it was broken in the first place 2021-10-23 19:37:05 btw for me 2 tests failed 2021-10-23 19:38:21 https://tpaste.us/dPXx 2021-10-23 20:00:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 20:08:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 20:23:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 20:35:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 20:37:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 20:49:19 PureTryOut: please check why buho fails ^^ something related to QT 2021-10-23 20:51:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 21:01:18 andypost: I think it's just a missing include, looking into it 2021-10-23 21:03:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 21:05:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 21:24:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 22:11:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 22:18:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 22:52:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 23:11:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 23:14:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 23:17:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 23:45:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-23 23:47:13 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 00:16:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 00:18:39 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 00:23:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 00:25:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 00:40:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 01:28:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 01:56:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:10:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:16:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:23:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:40:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:41:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 02:43:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 03:53:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 03:58:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:17:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:19:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:27:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:34:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:39:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:42:16 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:45:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:45:40 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:46:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 04:57:16 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:00:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:02:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:03:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:14:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:32:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:32:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:34:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:44:28 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:49:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:52:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:55:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:56:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:58:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 05:59:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:06:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:06:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:06:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:07:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:09:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:12:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:13:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:14:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:15:38 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:16:08 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:16:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:17:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:21:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:22:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:26:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:28:09 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:28:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:30:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:30:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:31:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:33:33 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:35:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:36:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:36:53 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:38:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:39:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:40:11 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:40:57 looks only broken left 2021-10-24 06:42:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:42:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:45:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:47:19 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:48:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:49:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:49:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:55:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:55:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:56:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:56:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:57:19 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 06:57:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 07:06:04 nx-libs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/799308 2021-10-24 07:06:27 https://github.com/ArcticaProject/nx-libs/commit/605a266911b50ababbb3f8a8b224efb42743379c.patch 2021-10-24 07:29:32 uh, this works on my 3 test machines 2021-10-24 07:43:14 mps: as I see it passed in CI too !26522 2021-10-24 07:43:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 07:44:53 andypost[m]: I tested it on x86_64 and aarch64 lxc, and on my local aarch64. passes all without any problem 2021-10-24 07:45:10 don't have idea why it fails on builders 2021-10-24 07:45:17 yep, I see it makes different errors in retry 2021-10-24 07:47:40 ohm, yes 2021-10-24 07:49:02 mps: locally it wont build 2021-10-24 07:49:40 > configure: error: expected a pathname, not "" 2021-10-24 07:49:52 andypost[m]: it builds locally 2021-10-24 07:50:37 I always test before push to builders 2021-10-24 07:50:50 mps: seems like same issue you had on CI? 2021-10-24 07:51:45 yes, something is wrong with CI and builders 2021-10-24 07:52:50 mps: or you have something installed locally that is not present on the builders 2021-10-24 07:52:56 ie, missing a dependency 2021-10-24 07:53:39 ikke: isn't pkgconf installed by default 2021-10-24 07:53:54 on builders, I mean 2021-10-24 07:56:31 apk info -r pkgconf => abuild 2021-10-24 07:56:33 mps: pkgconf is, but it only cotnains: https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/contents?branch=edge&name=pkgconf&arch=x86_64&repo=main 2021-10-24 07:57:19 that should be enough 2021-10-24 07:57:58 mps: filed !26761 and it fails 2021-10-24 08:01:01 yes, but don't understand why, while it pass on all my test boxes 2021-10-24 08:04:13 are there docs for rootbld somewhere, maybe could test with it 2021-10-24 08:05:03 or ask someone who are expert with pkgconf to look 2021-10-24 08:05:08 rootbld is easy to use 2021-10-24 08:05:17 just apk add abuild-rootbld and run `abuild rootbld` in the package directory 2021-10-24 08:05:45 nmeum: as user (not root)? 2021-10-24 08:06:14 yes, as user 2021-10-24 08:06:46 nmeum: thanks 2021-10-24 08:06:56 it fails also with rootbld 2021-10-24 08:08:38 ah, adding pkgconf-dev with rootbld looks like is fix 2021-10-24 08:09:00 thank you all for help 2021-10-24 08:12:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 08:13:01 mps: in !26761 as I got it just missing PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR 2021-10-24 08:13:59 andypost[m]: mps removed --with-pkg-config-libdir before 2021-10-24 08:14:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 08:14:21 ikke: I seen but it does nothing 2021-10-24 08:14:56 with env var it pass build but fails on packaging 2021-10-24 08:16:06 hmm 2021-10-24 08:16:36 ln: /home/buildozer/aports/main/ncurses/pkg/ncurses-dev/usr/lib/pkgconfig/ncurses.pc: No such file or directory 2021-10-24 08:17:26 ikke: I see 2021-10-24 08:18:27 could rootbld left src and pkg dirs after build 2021-10-24 08:19:01 you should be able to configure this via CLEANUP/ERROR_CLEANUP in abuild.conf 2021-10-24 08:19:46 or add -k 2021-10-24 08:20:03 sorry, -L 2021-10-24 08:20:06 -K 2021-10-24 08:23:34 abuild rootbld -K doesn't work so it must be abuild -L rootbld 2021-10-24 08:28:45 need to eat breakfast before it freezes 2021-10-24 08:36:17 nmeum: ah, you just preempted me :) 2021-10-24 08:37:59 ikke: oh, sorry! 2021-10-24 08:38:06 fyi: I am working on squeekboard now 2021-10-24 08:38:26 nmeum: no worry 2021-10-24 08:41:31 wtf happened to ncurses 2021-10-24 08:42:20 why is pkgconf-dev a dependency of ncurses o.O 2021-10-24 08:43:50 I think mps is looking into ncurses 2021-10-24 08:44:54 yes, but I don't think mps knows why this is happening 2021-10-24 08:45:24 It's looking for PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIRS 2021-10-24 08:46:03 # If we find pkg-config, check if we should install the ".pc" files. 2021-10-24 08:52:44 pkgconf β€”variable=pc_path pkgconf :) 2021-10-24 08:53:07 https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/blob/master/libpkgconf/pkg.c#L957 2021-10-24 08:57:48 https://tpaste.us/qPw4 2021-10-24 09:21:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 09:23:56 ikke: Ariadne: yes, I don't understand why ncurses now need pkgconf-dev in makedepends for builders, while it works fine without it on bare metal and lxc 2021-10-24 09:24:34 spooky 2021-10-24 09:24:39 I think bug is not in ncurses, but I'm not sure 2021-10-24 09:25:33 'spooky' means? 2021-10-24 09:32:28 maybe it is a bug in ncurses 2021-10-24 09:33:34 ikke: I told it works fine in bare metal and lxc 2021-10-24 09:33:46 doesn't mean there cannot be a bug 2021-10-24 09:34:10 agree, but wonder 2021-10-24 09:34:57 ikke: btw 'abuild -K rootbld' doesn't keep files bellow pkg dir 2021-10-24 09:51:17 mps: can you share the configure.log in a case where it succeeds? 2021-10-24 09:51:35 And also verify if /usr/lib/pkgconfig exists? 2021-10-24 09:56:53 ikke: any idea why 3 builders passed ncurses? 2021-10-24 09:57:13 no 2021-10-24 09:57:37 4 2021-10-24 09:58:37 fyi, it also fails on my personal lxc container if I remove pkgconf-dev 2021-10-24 10:02:31 andypost[m]: so there are 2 issues I suppose 2021-10-24 10:02:59 mps added pkgconf-dev, so the initial configure issue was 'fixed' 2021-10-24 10:06:06 but that means other builders needs something different 2021-10-24 10:16:35 mps: ikke: as I got .pc files installed only via -dev packages, so while no -dev packages installed it screams about missing /usr/lib/pkgconfig 2021-10-24 10:16:44 yes 2021-10-24 10:16:47 that's the first issue 2021-10-24 10:16:47 ikke: 'curl: (92) HTTP/2 stream 0 was not closed cleanly: PROTOCOL_ERROR (err 1)' on curl https://tpaste.us/xnMv , where I posted ncurses build log from 'abuild -r' 2021-10-24 10:17:01 just not clear why musl-dev has no .pc and why 4 builders has somethid installed 2021-10-24 10:17:20 andypost[m]: no, those builders do not have anything there 2021-10-24 10:17:24 I just checked x86_64 2021-10-24 10:17:35 With no deps installed, that dir does not exist 2021-10-24 10:17:43 I found one difference 2021-10-24 10:18:06 > ls: /usr/lib/pkgconfig: No such file or directory 2021-10-24 10:18:09 https://tpaste.us/ypq0 2021-10-24 10:19:47 huh 2021-10-24 10:19:49 so "/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig" is an issue 2021-10-24 10:20:46 looks like it is 2021-10-24 10:21:08 on clean builder/CI we don't have this dir 2021-10-24 10:21:58 It should not exist 2021-10-24 10:22:27 but with pkgconf-dev we 'got' it 2021-10-24 10:22:35 yes, not the /local/ variant 2021-10-24 10:24:01 The configure script sees that PKG_CONF_PATH does not exist, but then still tries to verify it 2021-10-24 10:25:48 yes, I see now 2021-10-24 10:26:02 But there is another difference 2021-10-24 10:26:20 on aarch64, the search list starts with /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig, 2021-10-24 10:27:07 checking for /usr/bin/pkg-config library directory... checking for search-list... /usr/lib/pkgconfig 2021-10-24 10:27:09 vs 2021-10-24 10:27:11 checking for /usr/bin/pkg-config library directory... checking for search-list... /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig 2021-10-24 10:27:40 and in the summary for aarch64: 2021-10-24 10:27:42 pkg-config directory: /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig 2021-10-24 10:29:20 ok, this looks like bug to report upsrteam 2021-10-24 10:31:31 So I see 2 issues 2021-10-24 10:31:46 1: fail when the pkg conf dir is not present 2021-10-24 10:31:53 2: incorrect search list 2021-10-24 10:32:26 or at least not actually traversing the search list 2021-10-24 10:33:09 I filed !26767 to prevent the 1 2021-10-24 10:35:03 maybe Ariadne could comment about the right approach? 2021-10-24 10:44:09 ok, I found why it passed on my test boxes, I have gmp-dev installed and it creates /usr/lib/pkgconf 2021-10-24 10:44:23 right, I had some kind of feeling 2021-10-24 10:44:29 /usr/lib/pkgconfig* 2021-10-24 10:45:41 iiuc 'we' should fix ./configure to not check existence of this dir and report upstream? 2021-10-24 10:45:52 We can disable it 2021-10-24 10:47:22 which option? I don't see it with './configure --help | less' 2021-10-24 10:48:13 I saw a variable in the configure script 2021-10-24 10:50:07 mps: maybe it's not possible 2021-10-24 10:50:39 if I understand configure lang :| 2021-10-24 10:51:55 'echo "$as_me: error: expected a pathname, not \"$PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR\"" >&2;} 2021-10-24 10:52:06 line 4301 2021-10-24 10:52:30 yes 2021-10-24 11:02:23 with this patch https://tpaste.us/YE4Z it passes build but don't create pkgconfig dir for ncurses-dev 2021-10-24 11:22:58 ikke: has go been bootstraped on the ppc64le builder yet? 2021-10-24 11:23:05 Apparently not 2021-10-24 11:23:32 ikke: andypost[m]: I copied configure from ncurses-6.2-20211009 and it worked, but patch would be huge 2021-10-24 11:23:41 mps: maybe ask upstream 2021-10-24 11:23:50 sure I will 2021-10-24 11:24:57 I'm thinking what to do to unblock builders 2021-10-24 11:25:05 revert upgrade for now? 2021-10-24 11:26:18 mps: maybe compare configure.in 2021-10-24 11:26:47 It's easier to patch that and to regenerate configure 2021-10-24 11:27:09 no diffs in them 2021-10-24 11:27:16 interesting 2021-10-24 11:27:23 yes 2021-10-24 11:27:27 and other related files? 2021-10-24 11:28:22 .guess and .sub, don't know how to work with them 2021-10-24 11:28:35 aclocal.m4? 2021-10-24 11:29:34 seems more relevant 2021-10-24 11:29:51 still big change 2021-10-24 11:29:55 ok 2021-10-24 11:30:31 add gmp-dev in makedeps for now :D 2021-10-24 11:30:56 does not fix the 'local' issue 2021-10-24 11:31:09 ah 2021-10-24 11:31:40 will write to upstream later 2021-10-24 12:31:50 > abuild-fetch: /var/cache/distfiles/edge/busybox-1.34.1.tar.bz2.lock: Permission denied 2021-10-24 12:31:52 😳 2021-10-24 13:03:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 13:57:48 ikke: ^^ could switch builder 2021-10-24 13:59:45 ppc64le is idle too 2021-10-24 14:11:50 ikke: strange on php7 above > ncurses-dev (no such package): 2021-10-24 16:19:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 16:21:20 bootstrapping go on ppc64le 2021-10-24 16:32:18 done 2021-10-24 16:54:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 16:55:59 ikke: ppc now reports >Permission denied 2021-10-24 16:56:29 oh, my bad 2021-10-24 16:57:00 ikke: the same on x86_64 2021-10-24 16:57:17 fixing it 2021-10-24 16:59:01 should work now 2021-10-24 16:59:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 17:00:13 hmm 2021-10-24 17:02:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 17:07:32 ikke: ppc-edge still reports no access to /var/cache/distfiles/edge/ 2021-10-24 17:08:40 Yes, don't understand why 2021-10-24 17:08:47 I can write files there 2021-10-24 17:08:50 as buildozer 2021-10-24 17:13:04 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 17:13:39 ikke: maybe because it appends "edge" or builders using it intentionally 2021-10-24 17:13:46 no 2021-10-24 17:14:03 forgot that ppc64le uses different vms 2021-10-24 17:14:08 was looking at the wrong one 2021-10-24 17:15:18 andypost[m]: we moved distfiles for edge to a dedicated directory instead of the root 2021-10-24 17:41:22 oh, no need to fix uutils-coreutils anymore I guess 2021-10-24 17:44:42 Let's see, it failed on x86_64 too 2021-10-24 17:44:46 ok 2021-10-24 17:44:58 I would add uname -n 2048 to check() 2021-10-24 17:45:04 I can still do that 2021-10-24 17:45:15 It would not fail if I run abuild check() 2021-10-24 17:56:43 ikke: looks not enough 2021-10-24 17:57:29 hmm, then it's probably a different issue 2021-10-24 20:05:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 20:09:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 20:11:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-24 20:12:35 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 05:15:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 05:31:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 12:16:20 ikke: hi, as I see edge ppc has issue with access to distfiles again 2021-10-25 12:19:16 andypost[m]: where? 2021-10-25 12:19:33 last error 2021-10-25 12:19:39 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 12:27:16 ikke: thank you! 2021-10-25 19:19:19 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 19:44:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 19:55:21 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 20:03:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 21:44:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 21:58:49 ikke: for some reason /tmp on builders does not allow to rmdir !26813 2021-10-25 22:17:44 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 22:26:47 ikke: looks build-3-15-x86_64 builder is offline 2021-10-25 22:31:41 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 23:24:20 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-25 23:27:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 01:22:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 01:57:39 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 02:02:38 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 02:39:38 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 03:10:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 03:16:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 03:24:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 03:51:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 03:55:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 04:59:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:30:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:31:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:33:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:37:54 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:41:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:44:02 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:51:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 05:58:49 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 06:01:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 08:17:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 08:25:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 08:28:37 ikke: build-3-15-x86_64 still unavailable? 2021-10-26 08:35:23 ^ :P 2021-10-26 11:16:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 15:33:17 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 15:42:30 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 15:50:18 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 15:51:58 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 18:19:21 ikke: 3.15-x86_64 builder >fatal error: error writing to /tmp/ccIFbJiL.s: No space left on device 2021-10-26 18:33:45 andypost[m]: freed some space 2021-10-26 18:41:14 algitbot: retry 3.13-stable 2021-10-26 18:42:12 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 18:42:19 tootle doesn't build with recent vala and libsoup versions 2021-10-26 18:42:23 shuold we just disable it for now? 2021-10-26 18:42:35 nmeum: I was thinking about that 2021-10-26 18:42:36 ikke: thank you! looks better to disable gitg now 2021-10-26 18:42:47 if there is a fix, we can always enable it later again 2021-10-26 18:42:52 not sure if I would disable gitg 2021-10-26 18:43:10 gitg failure looks to me like something that should be reported upstream https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/13122#note_187753 2021-10-26 18:43:15 andypost[m]: also fine with me, no dependencies 2021-10-26 18:43:28 It's blocking the builders now 2021-10-26 18:43:41 but yes, we should report it upstream 2021-10-26 18:44:11 nmeum: I mean we could disable tests to un-stuck builders 2021-10-26 18:44:11 nmeum: gitg is 'just' a git client, right? 2021-10-26 18:44:45 disabling tests can work as well, but these failures might indicate something else is broken as well 2021-10-26 18:44:55 or is this just an issue in the test suite? 2021-10-26 18:45:02 yes, that's why I filed issue 2021-10-26 18:45:18 andypost[m]: I would rather disable it then :p 2021-10-26 18:45:24 oh.. ghc( 2021-10-26 18:45:42 ikke: I think so yes, but still would be nice to report stuff upstream 2021-10-26 18:45:53 absolutely 2021-10-26 18:46:08 might even be some sort of issue in glib? I tried to look into it but all this gnome stuff is just beyond me 2021-10-26 18:46:16 also: I don't know vala 2021-10-26 18:46:52 idk, maybe just disable it and let Cogitri take care of it at some point :D 2021-10-26 18:48:25 right, we should do _something_ 2021-10-26 18:48:31 disable package, disable test suite 2021-10-26 18:49:12 ACTION pushing 2021-10-26 18:49:19 it just weidrly slow 2021-10-26 18:50:33 I still can;t pull to push) 2021-10-26 18:51:17 thanks 2021-10-26 18:51:21 I will disable tootle too 2021-10-26 18:51:44 so only lucene++ is mess 2021-10-26 18:51:57 I think I fixed lucene++ 2021-10-26 18:52:00 and ghc needs ncopa 2021-10-26 18:52:28 I think we can disable ghc for now 2021-10-26 18:52:47 I'll do that 2021-10-26 18:53:17 hmm, or not, that affects edge as well 2021-10-26 18:55:10 go-ipfs segfaults 2021-10-26 18:55:32 I can try to bootstrap ghc, see if it works 2021-10-26 18:56:16 I think JOWI had patches for ghc that made it build at least 2021-10-26 18:56:20 I bet disable will not affect edge, already built should stay 2021-10-26 18:56:35 nmeum: afaik ncopa made it work as well, but there were still things tangled 2021-10-26 18:56:38 I think cabal is the bigger problem 2021-10-26 18:56:46 right 2021-10-26 18:56:51 yep few tests fail 2021-10-26 18:57:00 maybe we can just get rid of cabal and use JOWIs ghc upgrade? 2021-10-26 18:57:06 i.e. keep ghc disable cabal 2021-10-26 18:58:01 not sure how usefull that is 2021-10-26 18:58:08 pandoc and shellcheck depend on cabal 2021-10-26 18:58:23 we'd only have a compiler, but no way to build programs 2021-10-26 18:58:32 I recall ncopa willed to disable it but then !20134 2021-10-26 18:59:00 https://lists.alpinelinux.org/~alpine/devel/%3C20211021133615.32f08070%40ncopa-desktop.lan%3E 2021-10-26 19:00:03 Yes, that's why I bet it fine to disable now 2021-10-26 19:00:55 Lua packages unclear to me( 2021-10-26 19:00:55 andypost[m]: right, but we then also need to disable shellcheck, and pandoc + remove dependencies on pandoc 2021-10-26 19:02:09 a few packages in testing need ghc too 2021-10-26 19:02:10 like idris 2021-10-26 19:02:38 alex, happy, klfc 2021-10-26 19:02:39 ghc without cabal is at least good enough to pass your average functional programming uni course :p 2021-10-26 19:03:01 I see to objection in replies and there's action plan) 2021-10-26 19:05:01 https://tpaste.us/Qrq0 2021-10-26 19:05:08 so the issues left was that packages pull in ghc 2021-10-26 19:14:04 then libreoffice - it still fails on few arches 2021-10-26 19:15:26 probably boost is buggy > configure: error: Could not link against boost_filesystem ! 2021-10-26 19:16:22 ikke: how to identify ghc's reverse dependencies for this tpaste? 2021-10-26 19:18:37 for R in main community testing; do { ap -d $PWD/$R revdep ghc cabal; }; done | sort -u 2021-10-26 19:18:58 https://tpaste.us/KMWo 2021-10-26 19:23:07 If !20134 works, should we merge it? 2021-10-26 19:36:26 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 19:38:50 ikke: it needs to disable more tests but as I got it "mostly-works", that's why it looks safer to just move to testing 2021-10-26 19:41:13 andypost[m]: afaik, the last commit from ncopa made it build 2021-10-26 19:42:38 ikke: I mean cvabal and what will fail to build 2021-10-26 19:42:44 *cabal 2021-10-26 19:42:47 ah ok 2021-10-26 20:19:47 andypost nmeum: Yup, if in doubt feel free to disable non core GNOME packages which block the release (would be great if you make a tracking issue for disabled packages). Since I’m currently in the progress of moving to a different city I don’t have the time to look into it immediately but I should be able to do that soon (tm) 2021-10-26 20:20:08 πŸ‘ 2021-10-26 20:20:12 Success with moving 2021-10-26 20:28:31 Cogitri: thank you, good luck with transition! 2021-10-26 20:29:36 ikke: armv7 uploading ! but x86_64 looks hangs again 2021-10-26 20:31:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 21:02:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 21:11:56 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 22:38:32 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 22:42:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 22:43:12 ikke: x86_64 become unavailable after building ldc 2021-10-26 22:43:42 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-26 23:56:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:06:55 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:08:57 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:09:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:11:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:13:14 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:22:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:23:34 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:39:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 00:56:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 05:00:22 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 05:33:28 ikke: we cannot merge !20134 yet 2021-10-27 05:33:40 ncopa: I had the feeling 2021-10-27 15:48:07 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-27 17:22:30 the ARM builders are low on disk space, it seems? 2021-10-27 17:22:34 Ariadne: yes 2021-10-27 17:22:42 I already made some space, I think gcc should build now 2021-10-27 17:22:48 problem is gcc likes space * 3 2021-10-27 17:47:48 Ghc also likes it coupling with libre office) 2021-10-27 18:01:01 andypost[m]: nod 2021-10-27 18:01:16 I removed libreoffice source directories, that helped 2021-10-27 18:02:17 btw patching gitea is not easy, better to wait maintainer's upgrade 2021-10-27 18:07:25 ikke: please check what's with aarch64 CI for https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/23777#note_188358 it also would be great get in 2021-10-28 00:15:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 00:28:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 00:29:00 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 00:29:03 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 02:10:29 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 02:22:36 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 02:22:50 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 03:45:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 03:46:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 03:48:06 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 03:48:31 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 03:50:23 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:06:15 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:06:25 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:06:40 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:07:51 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:30:52 andypost[m]: if you disable ghc, you also need to disable everything that depends on it 2021-10-28 04:38:10 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:38:35 ikke: I bet ncopa mostly done with it 2021-10-28 04:38:47 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 04:39:15 looks only 3 packages left - ghc/cabal and one more... 2021-10-28 04:40:01 andypost[m]: what I read is that there is quite some work to be done 2021-10-28 04:40:30 so let's disable it and what depends on it 2021-10-28 04:41:16 ikke: can you check what's left except it? 2021-10-28 04:42:48 cloudi and shellcheck (depends on ghc) 2021-10-28 04:44:14 ACTION checking  2021-10-28 04:56:03 testing does not need to disabled for now 2021-10-28 05:01:04 yes, it will use already existing ones) 2021-10-28 05:03:55 ikke: so looks everything passed! thank you for help 2021-10-28 05:28:30 andypost[m]: you as well 2021-10-28 06:26:59 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 09:21:16 algitbot: retry 3.12-stable 2021-10-28 09:22:24 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 14:35:05 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 14:58:27 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 15:13:27 disabled tests was the most flaky 2021-10-28 15:23:34 andypost[m]: I wonder how long it takes before we effectively disable all tests :P 2021-10-28 15:26:42 ikke: you should set up a test to measure how many tests are being tested ;-) 2021-10-28 15:27:00 Who's testing the tests 2021-10-28 15:45:27 ikke: there's 977 more) but probably because of large file test it blocks other tests (running 32 parallel processes) 2021-10-28 15:52:37 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-28 15:59:37 minimal: ^ 2021-10-28 16:01:38 mps: thanks, I'll get that a test and let you know how I get on 2021-10-28 16:03:30 ok 2021-10-29 07:16:52 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-30 12:21:35 \o/ 2021-10-30 12:29:35 heh, looks like algitbot is cheering the ghc build failure :P 2021-10-30 13:27:48 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-31 07:01:01 algitbot: retry master 2021-10-31 11:41:36 algitbot: retry master