2017-03-02 01:29:14 humm 2017-03-02 01:29:27 what the hell, I cannot reproduce this on my machine 2017-03-02 01:29:36 yes, it builds fine on my machine too 2017-03-02 01:31:54 trying on Travis no 2017-03-02 01:31:56 now 2017-03-02 01:31:56 https://travis-ci.org/alpinelinux/aports/builds/206836997 2017-03-02 01:34:25 grrr, why it must take so long for pkgs to be available in the repo 2017-03-02 01:36:13 kaniini: I need to go sleep, could you please try to investigate this error and if you will not be able to fix it, then just add options="!check" with comment that there’s something fucked up…? 2017-03-02 01:36:27 no problem 2017-03-02 01:36:49 kaniini: thanks! 2017-03-02 01:43:37 the output of the cl_standalone.lua is different, but i cant figure out why 2017-03-02 15:56:15 humm 2017-03-02 15:58:16 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-08 12:55:55 ncopa, can you please delete the libverto-0.2.5.tar.gz ? 2017-03-08 12:56:25 i've changed the src url due to fedorahosted, checksum is correct, but the builder since has it in cache does not redownload it 2017-03-08 12:56:50 ok 2017-03-08 12:57:31 thx 2017-03-09 23:33:40 ncopa, why does the bot announce uploaded from repo's nothing has changed from? 2017-03-09 23:40:33 ufff, finally, this f*cking segfault and iterator error took me about 6 hours to figure out what the hell is wrong and how to fix it 2017-03-09 23:40:42 C is horrible 2017-03-10 08:43:19 clandmeter: the script will try build the entire repo, either if there are anything to build or not 2017-03-10 08:43:27 and after the build it will run rsync 2017-03-10 08:43:42 rsync takes care of not upload duplicates 2017-03-10 08:44:03 so when rsync is called, the script does not know if there was anything new actually built or not 2017-03-10 08:44:07 well, before it didnt happen. 2017-03-10 08:44:14 i think it did 2017-03-10 08:44:22 i dont think so 2017-03-10 08:44:33 i think it changed around the time i created aarch64 2017-03-10 08:44:36 what we changed was that we build+upload one and one repo 2017-03-10 08:44:43 instead of build all repos and then upload 2017-03-10 08:45:01 because we wanted upload main even if something in testing failed 2017-03-10 08:45:23 i understand, its just confusing. 2017-03-10 08:46:04 we could change the message 2017-03-10 08:46:11 "synced to main" 2017-03-10 08:46:32 i dont think that matters 2017-03-10 08:47:05 we could run a check in every repo before we try build 2017-03-10 08:47:12 and skip if there is nothing to rebuild 2017-03-10 08:47:19 if i push something to testing, i first get a msg aobut main is succesfulll 2017-03-10 08:47:29 yeah 2017-03-10 08:47:43 so i was like, ok nice lets get going. 2017-03-10 08:48:00 didnt pay attention it was main... 2017-03-10 08:48:38 but its not that important i think. 2017-03-10 08:48:56 sound like work which can be better spend on important things. 2017-03-10 08:53:16 well 2017-03-10 08:53:25 we could actually fix it 2017-03-10 08:53:30 it would be an improvement 2017-03-10 08:54:28 we currently 1) build packages 2) purge old package, 3) generate new index 4) run post-hook (i think here is where we rsync) 2017-03-10 08:54:36 if there are no packages to build 2017-03-10 08:54:44 then we dont need to do anything of the other stuff 2017-03-10 08:55:45 what i mean, we could speed up things when we only push to one of the repos 2017-03-10 08:55:55 which is what we mostly do 2017-03-10 08:56:45 and as a side effect of that optimization, the messages of empty uploads will disapear 2017-03-10 08:56:54 i think we should fix that 2017-03-10 09:02:47 hum 2017-03-10 09:02:53 no, we dont rsync from hook 2017-03-10 09:11:02 ok, i think we maybe dont want to change it after all 2017-03-10 09:11:13 for master mirror is down for some reason 2017-03-10 09:11:15 someone push 2017-03-10 09:11:19 it fails to upload 2017-03-10 09:11:28 master mirror comes up again 2017-03-10 09:12:01 then we want retry rsync to main again, even if package only in testing was built 2017-03-10 09:12:30 alternatively we could save the failed upload state 2017-03-10 09:12:43 if upload fails, we set a state file 2017-03-10 09:13:14 then we rsync if built_packages > 0 or state_file exists 2017-03-10 10:38:44 ncopa, so it regenerates an new index even if no new pkg is created/updated/deleted? 2017-03-10 10:40:05 ncopa, i think it would make sense to have a message in case an rsync process did not exit correctly. 2017-03-10 10:44:29 yes and yes 2017-03-10 10:44:47 i htink we should move the rsync to be a post-repo hook 2017-03-10 10:44:48 ok, so we can fix those 2 2017-03-10 10:45:24 have a process per repo, check build and check upload 2017-03-12 21:19:06 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-16 15:16:51 algitbot:retry master 2017-03-16 15:35:08 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/tint2.git/commit/ 2017-03-16 15:35:14 this was pushed 3hrs ago 2017-03-16 15:35:45 but http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/%{name}/source/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz does not contains yet 0.13.1 2017-03-16 15:45:12 this is disturbing 2017-03-16 15:47:39 ncopa, i'm not able to find a mirror with that versio 2017-03-16 15:47:41 *version 2017-03-16 15:47:56 3hrs ago fedora pushed this version 2017-03-16 15:48:06 but seems not yet available 2017-03-16 15:48:23 https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/tint2/source/ 2017-03-16 15:48:45 right 2017-03-16 15:48:55 that corresponds to our archive.a.o 2017-03-16 15:49:06 http://git.net/ml/scm-fedora-commits/2017-03/msg10523.html 2017-03-16 15:49:07 i think we should pus it to dev.a.o:/archive/ 2017-03-16 15:49:13 +1 2017-03-16 15:49:27 fcolista: thank you 2017-03-16 15:49:42 sorry for this noise 2017-03-16 15:50:05 dunno why it happens after 2 days. Probably they changed the way they ships the tar.gz 2017-03-16 15:50:19 commit 7178ce025e80835fa692340a16dc2f4978c5ec33 2017-03-16 15:50:19 Author: Francesco Colista 2017-03-16 15:50:19 Date: Tue Mar 14 10:30:51 2017 +0000 2017-03-16 15:50:19 community/tint2: upgrade to 0.13.1 2017-03-16 15:50:45 --> http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/%{name}/source/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2017-03-16 15:50:49 i think its gitlab that is stupid 2017-03-16 15:51:06 this should be the updated source from now on then 2017-03-16 15:51:26 we have anitya that alerts on new version 2017-03-16 15:51:35 so i'll follow that update cycle 2017-03-16 15:51:43 can't do more 2017-03-16 15:56:44 ncopa: I can use this: 2017-03-16 15:56:45 http://git.net/ml/scm-fedora-commits/2017-03/msg10511.html 2017-03-16 15:57:03 but it's alooong src 2017-03-16 15:59:27 better copy it to dev.a.o 2017-03-16 16:00:10 ok. 2017-03-16 16:19:52 ?!?!?!/usr/bin/abuild: cd: line 1: can't cd to /home/fcolista/aports/community/tint2/src/tint2-0.13.1-4d12abdb4263d6875b069e7b2c214e65a7c1edac 2017-03-16 16:20:36 ah 2017-03-16 16:20:37 ok 2017-03-16 16:43:48 algibot: retry master 2017-03-16 16:51:40 armhf/aarch64 need their respective maintainers to delete the distfile i think 2017-03-16 17:07:29 kaniini, yes 2017-03-16 17:07:36 i'm unable to login there 2017-03-17 11:11:46 ouch 2017-03-17 16:30:52 file truncated wtf 2017-03-17 20:11:28 but why 2017-03-17 20:12:08 oh i see 2017-03-17 20:12:14 it's a parallelism issue 2017-03-17 20:21:19 jirutka: good catch 2017-03-17 20:23:03 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-17 20:23:16 humm 2017-03-17 20:23:36 i wonder if something is wrong with the armhf builder 2017-03-17 20:23:40 because it is being very slow 2017-03-17 20:23:48 much slower than i recall it should be 2017-03-18 08:14:04 clandmeter ^ 2017-03-18 08:14:06 tbh 2017-03-20 14:06:29 uh 2017-03-20 14:06:39 maybe he sent a seonc dpatch? 2017-03-20 14:07:07 nope 2017-03-20 14:07:13 Update mismatch sha512 sum. 2017-03-20 14:07:18 comment says 2017-03-20 14:07:33 and I built it locally 2017-03-20 14:08:48 thats weird 2017-03-20 14:08:49 redownloading checksum looks good 2017-03-20 14:08:58 yeah 2017-03-20 14:09:04 x86 didn't complain 2017-03-21 06:14:36 grrrrrr 2017-03-21 06:14:47 going to acquire armhf and aarch64 hardware so i can fix these things 2017-03-21 12:55:19 jirutka do you know what caused the issue with travis? 2017-03-21 13:09:37 scadu: don’t know :/ 2017-03-21 14:16:07 hum it still does not generate logfiles 2017-03-21 14:18:04 checksum error 2017-03-21 14:18:19 curl: (18) transfer closed with 9150385 bytes remaining to read 2017-03-21 14:56:43 now I can see the logs 2017-03-21 15:20:20 yup, should be fixed 2017-03-21 15:21:23 looks like we need linux-headers 2017-03-21 16:25:46 ncopa, I found help. gromero is going to convert our VM to ext4. 2017-03-21 16:26:01 ncopa, can he stop the machine? 2017-03-21 16:27:46 yes 2017-03-21 16:27:49 please do so 2017-03-21 16:27:53 gromero, ^ 2017-03-21 16:28:01 leitao: ncopa ok 2017-03-21 16:41:57 ncopa: do I have to shutdown any service in particular way or I can just go for "poweroff"? 2017-03-21 16:42:08 *in a particular way 2017-03-21 16:46:11 poweroff is good 2017-03-21 16:46:52 ncopa: ok 2017-03-21 17:29:00 ncopa: hi, leitao said that a kernel update is also necessary. Could please tell me which release tag is more appropriate so? 2017-03-21 17:38:02 gromero: release tag? 2017-03-21 17:38:13 ncopa: kernel version 2017-03-21 17:38:27 4.9.y 2017-03-21 17:38:30 latest 4.9 2017-03-21 17:38:31 ok 2017-03-21 17:58:54 08:27 aports:master |Timo Teräs| main/musl: cherry-pick ldso improvements and lazy relocation emulation | http://dup.pw/aports/dd232808 2017-03-21 17:58:56 scary 2017-03-21 17:59:21 i'm not sure integrating that 1 week prior to freeze was good, but i guess we have done it :D 2017-03-21 23:04:43 ncopa: yt? 2017-03-21 23:04:46 *yet 2017-03-22 00:20:43 gromero : probably he is offline. his timezone is CET I guess :) 2017-03-22 08:19:47 hi 2017-03-22 11:51:39 sigh... 2017-03-22 14:40:40 <^7heo> "failed to build cups" 2017-03-22 14:40:48 <^7heo> like anyone ever makes that work. 2017-03-22 14:42:24 cups sound useful, since apk has coffee making abilities 2017-03-22 14:57:47 <^7heo> yeah but it's an Apple technology, and everyone knows that pouring a hot liquid on/in a carved apple will lead to disaster. 2017-03-22 14:59:33 I tried to reproduce the cups issue here on amd64 2017-03-22 14:59:43 but I was not able to 2017-03-22 15:00:00 still digging. 2017-03-22 15:00:15 <^7heo> use a drill ;) 2017-03-22 15:01:34 ^7heo, which brand would you recommend? De Walt? 2017-03-22 15:02:19 <^7heo> Hitachi. 2017-03-22 15:02:24 <^7heo> Good bang for the buck. 2017-03-22 15:02:36 XD 2017-03-22 15:02:58 <^7heo> And they have a better magic wand than harry potter. 2017-03-22 15:13:14 I can just afford Skill 300W drills. 2017-03-22 15:16:52 <^7heo> Now you've found why you can't reproduce the cups issue ;) 2017-03-22 15:18:36 :-) 2017-03-22 15:21:50 never saw Hitachi drills selling here in the tropics... 2017-03-22 15:24:53 leitao: http://build.alpinelinux.org/ see #20 2017-03-22 15:25:57 gromero, Nice. Outstanding work! 2017-03-22 15:26:03 +1 2017-03-22 15:26:40 <^7heo> I am not following. 2017-03-22 15:26:50 <^7heo> aaah 2017-03-22 15:26:56 they gave more disk space to the ppc64le builder 2017-03-22 15:26:56 ^7heo, Forget algibot message 2017-03-22 15:26:58 <^7heo> it has nothing to do with #20 from b.a.o 2017-03-22 15:27:01 <^7heo> yeah 2017-03-22 15:27:05 <^7heo> algitbot: stop spamming! 2017-03-22 15:27:14 algitbot: please behave 2017-03-22 15:27:23 <^7heo> ncopa: niice :D 2017-03-22 15:27:28 algitbot, bummer 2017-03-22 15:28:00 <^7heo> so we're celebrating libgudev on ppc64? 2017-03-22 15:28:17 yup 2017-03-22 15:28:19 but hum 2017-03-22 15:28:22 <^7heo> (just checking if I'm getting it right) 2017-03-22 15:28:29 <^7heo> ja? 2017-03-22 15:29:01 apaprently something is not working 2017-03-22 15:29:09 looks like its stuck in scp the bulid log 2017-03-22 15:29:53 <^7heo> scp needs more coffee :D 2017-03-22 17:44:18 what is the abuild version used on the builder? 2017-03-22 17:44:24 I am not able to reproduce the cups issue 2017-03-22 17:45:01 I am using abuild version 3.0.0_rc1-3-g834cb71 2017-03-22 18:43:44 ncopa, I think I have a fix for the cups break 2017-03-22 18:43:44 https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/pull/1065 2017-03-22 18:43:52 and an improvement for abuild 2017-03-22 18:44:05 https://github.com/alpinelinux/abuild/pull/14 2017-03-22 19:01:22 cool. jirutka accepted my patch. Let's see if cups will stop breaking on ppc64le 2017-03-22 19:02:49 could please the one who’s responsible for this php7 pkg fix it…? 2017-03-22 19:08:11 <^7heo> :D 2017-03-22 19:08:17 <^7heo> abuild blame 2017-03-22 19:08:55 <^7heo> # Maintainer: Valery Kartel 2017-03-22 19:31:10 landing a fix 2017-03-22 19:33:11 zbar is due to missing patch in the PR 2017-03-22 19:33:17 wtf :D 2017-03-22 19:34:32 ^7heo: no, this is not Valery’s fault 2017-03-22 19:34:45 this time it’s ncopa, both these errors :( 2017-03-22 19:36:08 <^7heo> jirutka: I don't know, I just did abuild blame. 2017-03-22 19:36:30 ^7heo: you git log… 2017-03-22 19:36:31 raccoon:~/aports/testing/zbar$ abuild blame 2017-03-22 19:36:32 /usr/bin/abuild: line 2317: blame: not found 2017-03-22 19:36:34 that's not a thing :( 2017-03-22 19:36:49 <^7heo> kaniini: in here it is ;) 2017-03-22 19:37:22 and yes, ultimately whoever sponsors the patch by committing it is equally responsible 2017-03-22 19:37:39 <^7heo> thankfully ;) 2017-03-22 19:37:40 kaniini: exactly 2017-03-22 19:38:48 as you can see, the system works 2017-03-22 19:39:10 ? 2017-03-22 19:40:05 well, the tree is no longer red anyway. 2017-03-22 19:40:09 :p 2017-03-22 19:40:11 you’ve disabled the pkg, that’s not a real solution; ofc that’s not your fault, the patch is probably only on ncopa’s computer, but I just wanna say that this situation is not okay 2017-03-22 19:40:21 i was being sarcastic :) 2017-03-22 19:40:25 heh, okay :) 2017-03-22 19:40:34 I’m too tired now to recognize sarcasm patterns :) 2017-03-22 19:41:53 hopefully some of this stuff gets better once we have in-chroot builds by default for abuild 2017-03-22 19:42:29 i'm hopeful that this TemptorSent fellow will solve a lot of these infrastructure things -- he seems to really like that sort of stuff 2017-03-22 19:52:47 and he seems to even has time for it 2017-03-22 19:53:10 I also love this stuff, but there too many things I love and too little time 2017-03-22 19:54:59 I need to find someone who can pay me for working on Alpine and do it like full time job, that would be awesome (and also kinda unrealistic :( ) XD 2017-03-22 19:57:40 ugh 2017-03-22 19:57:43 what did i do 2017-03-22 20:02:11 sorry about those 2017-03-22 20:09:56 how do I know if cups was build on ppc64le? 2017-03-22 20:10:10 I stop see algibot complaining. :-) 2017-03-22 20:27:33 let’s try this… 2017-03-22 20:27:38 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-22 20:32:21 <^7heo> kaniini: here is your abuild blame: https://gist.github.com/7heo/8f9a9fc375a7e5ec913d8385d3c07663 2017-03-22 20:32:39 nice 2017-03-22 20:33:14 we should add that to real abuild 2017-03-22 20:33:22 <^7heo> well 2017-03-22 20:33:31 <^7heo> just place it in your /usr/local/bin/blame 2017-03-22 20:33:40 <^7heo> and you'll be able to abuild blame ;) 2017-03-22 20:33:57 <^7heo> $ abuild blame 2017-03-22 20:33:57 <^7heo> Package maintainer: 2017-03-22 20:33:57 <^7heo> No other contributors listed 2017-03-22 20:33:57 <^7heo> 7heo <7heo@mail.com> 2017-03-22 20:34:08 <^7heo> on my current package. 2017-03-23 00:30:30 jirutka: I just updated PR 1066. Should I remove the " changes-requested" label? 2017-03-23 00:31:22 breno: well, you can try to remove it :) but it would require some hacking 2017-03-23 00:32:30 jirutka, what would you recommend me doing once I fix a PR? 2017-03-23 00:32:31 currently looking at travis log, to see why it failed 2017-03-23 00:32:43 jirutka, what is the URL for travis log? 2017-03-23 00:32:58 just click on the red cross under the comments 2017-03-23 00:32:59 https://travis-ci.org/alpinelinux/aports/jobs/214070193 2017-03-23 00:34:39 it’s kinda stuck, don’t know if it’s problem on travis or on my side 2017-03-23 00:35:03 (17/24) Installing coreutils (8.27-r0) 2017-03-23 00:35:04 ERROR: coreutils-8.27-r0: ZZZZZZZZZZbin/lnZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ: no dirent in archive 2017-03-23 00:35:11 what the hell is that error?! o.O 2017-03-23 00:36:10 i’ve restarted the job 2017-03-23 00:36:32 ok 2017-03-23 00:36:50 I was trying to discover how the failure was related to my change. 2017-03-23 00:37:36 it seems that the package is correct, so maybe some weird problem on travis side o.O 2017-03-23 00:37:42 it seems that it’s unrelated 2017-03-23 00:38:56 looks really like some travis issue; the patch is okay, so I’m gonna merge it now 2017-03-23 00:39:41 jirutka, Ok. Thanks 2017-03-23 04:48:44 hmm 2017-03-23 04:49:42 this is annoying 2017-03-23 04:53:58 great 2017-03-23 05:06:59 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-23 05:23:22 because of course... 2017-03-23 06:14:16 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-23 07:09:43 i don't know what to do here 2017-03-23 07:09:46 it's still broken 2017-03-23 11:54:29 i know what the problem with firefox-esr and nss is 2017-03-23 11:54:39 but i dont know what the proper solution is 2017-03-23 11:56:34 problem is that there is no dynamic libcrmf 2017-03-23 11:56:41 only static libcrmf.a 2017-03-23 12:25:20 <^7heo> It would be great to put the comitter and the maintainer in the log here, don't you think? 2017-03-23 12:25:56 <^7heo> esp for failures 2017-03-23 12:26:50 <^7heo> that way it's easy to setup a highlight for IRC clients 2017-03-23 12:27:29 <^7heo> /.*failed to build.*7heo.*/ 2017-03-23 12:27:36 <^7heo> bam, highlight 2017-03-23 12:28:09 <^7heo> if someone is commiting on a package I'm a maintainer for, then I know it broke 2017-03-23 12:56:18 <^7heo> ncopa: what do you think about my proposal above? 2017-03-23 12:58:12 sounds good to me 2017-03-23 13:02:42 <^7heo> \o/ 2017-03-23 13:02:47 <^7heo> Would you implement it, or I? 2017-03-23 13:08:10 heh 2017-03-23 13:08:22 do i look like someone who is looking for mor job? 2017-03-23 13:08:25 :) 2017-03-23 13:08:50 i need to clean up the nss mess 2017-03-23 13:10:39 <^7heo> understood I'll try to patch that. 2017-03-23 13:29:03 fabled: openjdk7 build fails due to /bin/cpio being hardcoded in the makefiles 2017-03-23 13:29:25 i remember we had some issue with cpio earlise 2017-03-23 13:29:31 *earlier 2017-03-23 13:30:36 i wonder if we should move /usr/bin/cpio back to /bin/cpio or if we patch openjdk7 2017-03-23 13:31:11 ncopa: do even some other pkgs assume /bin/cpio or just openjdk? 2017-03-23 13:31:23 not that i know 2017-03-23 13:31:28 but i think its stupid 2017-03-23 13:31:38 then I think it’d be better to patch openjdk 2017-03-23 13:31:41 if platform linux then CPIO=/bin/cpio 2017-03-23 13:31:57 i wonder why they simply dont rely on PATH 2017-03-23 13:32:21 probably just b/c of ignorance and stupidity, usual reasons… 2017-03-23 13:32:26 cd .. 2017-03-23 13:32:45 or they want workaround that people have weird PATH setting 2017-03-23 13:33:29 that’s basically the same :) “fixing” broken environment by breaking other stuff is not a good solution :) 2017-03-23 13:37:33 ncopa, moving cpio back means, we need fix coreutils too or other packages barf 2017-03-23 13:38:18 yeah, i suppose we patch openjdk7 2017-03-23 13:38:26 should be trivial 2017-03-23 13:38:48 its kind of stupid though 2017-03-23 13:39:00 the configure script will detect it in /usr/bin/cpio 2017-03-23 13:39:12 so in many files CPIO=/usr/bin/cpio 2017-03-23 13:39:19 but not everywhere 2017-03-23 14:13:20 http://tpaste.us/yapk 2017-03-23 14:13:28 but openjdk-boot does not exist? 2017-03-23 15:31:18 argh 2017-03-23 18:22:05 hmm 2017-03-23 18:59:29 i feel filthy haivng worked on that APKBUILD 2017-03-23 18:59:36 i havent touched that in years :p 2017-03-23 19:01:49 kaniini : wow adobe now support linux again with npapi 2017-03-23 19:02:16 kaniini : I have alwasy been using this as a wrapper around chrome's flash.so 2017-03-23 19:05:26 https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin 2017-03-23 19:56:52 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-23 19:57:23 why is x86_64 still stuck on openjdk7? 2017-03-23 20:01:01 not known 2017-03-23 20:01:27 vakartel strikes again 2017-03-23 20:12:23 i tried build openjdk7 earlier 2017-03-23 20:12:38 the build in my dev box is not done yet 2017-03-23 20:12:43 seems like it hangs 2017-03-23 20:12:49 i'll wait til tomorrow 2017-03-24 05:25:43 build-edge-x86_64 still hung grrrrrrr 2017-03-24 09:22:34 any chance to get testing repo working again? 2017-03-24 09:33:43 i think openjdk7 triggers bug in gjc 2017-03-24 09:34:06 hum 2017-03-24 09:34:07 no 2017-03-24 09:34:27 its javac thats broken 2017-03-24 09:34:42 it gives compiler error on my workstation but on builder it just hangs 2017-03-24 09:34:53 /home/ncopa/aports/community/openjdk7/src/icedtea-2.6.8/bootstrap/jdk1.6.0/bin/javac -J-XX:ThreadStackSize=1664 -J-XX:-PrintVMOptions -J-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -J-XX:-LogVMOutput -J-Xmx512m -J-Xms512m -J-XX:PermSize=32m -J-XX:MaxPermSize=160m -g -Xlint:-path -source 7 -target 7 -encoding ascii -Xbootclasspath:/home/ncopa/aports/community/openjdk7/src/icedtea-2.6.8/openjdk.build-boot/classes -sourcepath /home/ncopa/aports/community/openjdk7/src/i 2017-03-24 09:34:53 cedtea-2.6.8/generated.build:../../../src/solaris/classes:../../../src/share/classes -d /home/ncopa/aports/community/openjdk7/src/icedtea-2.6.8/openjdk.build-boot/classes @/home/ncopa/aports/community/openjdk7/src/icedtea-2.6.8/openjdk.build-boot/tmp/java/java.lang/java/.classes.list.filtered 2017-03-24 13:11:49 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-24 14:59:04 rnalrd: thanks for the typo fix :) 2017-03-24 14:59:10 was just looking at it 2017-03-24 14:59:12 yw 2017-03-24 14:59:26 this set -e thingy is really useful 2017-03-24 14:59:31 y 2017-03-24 17:46:35 hi 2017-03-24 22:15:24 tmh1999: ^ 2017-03-24 22:18:53 kaniini: thank you :) 2017-03-25 03:14:40 kaniini : I was about to support flex patch. Thank you 2017-03-25 03:16:21 :D 2017-03-25 03:18:07 hmm is armhf just behind? 2017-03-25 03:19:51 I don't know. I don't have builder access nor armhf exp :D 2017-03-25 03:25:26 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-25 03:25:36 hmm 2017-03-25 03:26:22 hmmmmmmm 2017-03-25 03:26:47 userspace-rcu doesnt seem like that big a package 2017-03-25 03:28:26 pcsc-lite package seems odd too 2017-03-25 03:29:43 that should fix pcsc-lite 2017-03-25 03:30:06 you tried on all arch you have access to ? 2017-03-25 03:31:02 i reproduced on my own machine and fixed it there 2017-03-25 03:31:06 ah 2017-03-25 03:31:10 or do you mean userspace-rcu 2017-03-25 03:31:48 no I thought it is some thing else 2017-03-25 03:31:54 i have x86/x86_64 and a container on the aarch64 porting machine 2017-03-25 03:32:20 as well as mipsel (not yet qualified for the archive, may try to do it for 3.6) 2017-03-25 03:32:45 and ppc 32-bit big-endian (also not yet qualified) 2017-03-25 03:34:37 i guess the power8 builder is not on dedicated hardware 2017-03-25 03:37:55 it is 2017-03-25 03:38:10 to my knowledge it is 2017-03-25 03:39:00 oh by not on dedicated hardware you mean qemu or something ? I believe it is on VM 2017-03-25 03:39:42 which should be counted as dedicated hw 2017-03-25 03:43:18 i would expect it to be faster :/ 2017-03-25 03:48:12 tmh1999: you are at IBM or? 2017-03-25 03:48:17 ACTION is curious why s390x 2017-03-25 03:48:29 kaniini : No I am just a student 2017-03-25 03:48:39 I am learning about s390x 2017-03-25 03:48:52 ah 2017-03-25 03:49:30 never know why ppc64le has a dedicated team for linux while s390x doesn't ... 2017-03-25 03:50:13 alpine is an interesting bet for ppc64le 2017-03-25 03:50:27 how so? I have zero knowledge for power arch 2017-03-25 03:50:40 alpine is interesting bet for s390x to, to my knowledge 2017-03-25 03:50:50 alpine is an interesting bet for IBM in general 2017-03-25 03:50:54 lol 2017-03-25 03:51:05 how so ? from powerpc perspective ? 2017-03-25 03:51:06 because they can come in and control the entire experience for their customers 2017-03-25 03:51:14 vs. working with redhat etc 2017-03-25 03:51:36 if that's the case IBM should push more support to alpine 2017-03-25 03:52:34 i'm sure it is coming 2017-03-25 03:52:48 alpine is what corporate types would call an 'emerging technology' 2017-03-25 03:53:08 they would consider docker the same, but i consider docker just yet another jail implementation myself ;) 2017-03-25 03:53:12 I don't know if there was a dedicated porter/maintainer for musl-ppc, because I am having tons of trouble with musl-s390x ... 2017-03-25 03:53:30 I agree on Docker thing 2017-03-25 03:54:07 there's one ecosystem which bigger coverage than Docker, cloundfoundary ? 2017-03-25 03:54:14 I forgot the name 2017-03-25 04:10:34 kaniini : do you know any tutorial/book/write-up/blog on real-life debugging libc/kernel code ? 2017-03-25 04:10:51 with example, and explanation would be extremely helpful 2017-03-25 04:10:53 what are you trying to debug 2017-03-25 04:11:10 I was having a segfault building ocaml 2017-03-25 04:11:24 I am trying some mods on musl s390x 2017-03-25 04:11:56 I am clueless on how libc headers and kernel header/code interact 2017-03-25 04:12:08 okay, so basically 2017-03-25 04:12:29 libc makes syscalls on your app's behalf to the kernel 2017-03-25 04:13:11 libc does not need to use kernel headers or even structure layouts, but it is responsible for converting it to a form the kernel finds acceptable if it deviates 2017-03-25 04:13:15 so for example 2017-03-25 04:13:25 if you have a syscall which takes 2017-03-25 04:13:43 struct foo { uint64_t a; uint64_t b; } 2017-03-25 04:13:52 but `b` is always 0 2017-03-25 04:13:55 then musl might have 2017-03-25 04:14:02 struct foo { uint64_t a; } only 2017-03-25 04:14:32 so musl would have to translate its struct foo, to the kernel's struct foo prior to making the syscall 2017-03-25 04:14:51 actually, lets move this to #musl 2017-03-25 04:15:04 I talked to dalias about this 2017-03-25 04:15:34 I was about to give up the debugging and send an email to musl 2017-03-25 04:15:42 the thing is 2017-03-25 04:15:47 I am not sure if it is musl s390x bug 2017-03-25 04:15:57 or ocaml's glibc implementation bug 2017-03-25 04:17:15 i would need a build log to see 2017-03-25 04:17:39 you want to do it here or on #musl ? 2017-03-25 04:18:00 musl 2017-03-25 17:28:13 why the heck it must take so loooong for pkgs to sync from builder to mirrors >_< 2017-03-25 17:32:03 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-25 20:17:31 Hello. How do I see the latest packages that didn' t build on ppc64le? 2017-03-25 20:18:18 leitao: tinc, kbd, taskd, perl-test-output, smartmontools, perl-carp-clan, py-imaging, privoxy, exiv2 2017-03-25 20:18:51 kaniini, nice. Working on them. How did you get this list? 2017-03-25 20:19:34 leitao: irc logs :) 2017-03-25 20:20:34 kaniini, do you have your own, or, is it public at the web? 2017-03-25 20:21:07 i just scrolled up in the client tbh 2017-03-25 20:21:52 kaniini, right. I will need to have a bounce then. 2017-03-25 20:25:12 i think i am going to propose building all packages with -fpermissive on all archs 2017-03-25 20:25:37 thoughts? 2017-03-25 20:25:41 kaniini, right, this will help ppc64le 2017-03-25 20:26:10 I fixed an issue yesterday about this. 2017-03-25 20:29:08 leitao : http://dev.alpinelinux.org/irclogs/ 2017-03-25 20:29:36 tmh1999, that is helpful! 2017-03-25 21:00:25 leitao: you can also watch MQTT topic `mosquitto_sub -h msg.alpinelinux.org -t 'build/build-edge-ppc64le'` 2017-03-25 21:03:14 jirutka, what does this topic shows? building packages? how do I see those that breaks 2017-03-25 21:04:26 leitao: build messages in this channel comes from MQTT; you can write a simple script that will watch this topic and filter failures 2017-03-25 21:05:00 jirutka, got it! 2017-03-25 22:02:32 tmh1999, it seems that the logs in the web dos not contain message from algibot 2017-03-25 23:18:34 leitao : right ... in my case I compile all the package myself first to see if any package fails, then submit the patches to aports so the automated builder won't complain 2017-03-25 23:21:22 leitao : this is the log I have in my irc client on ppc64le build fail : http://tpaste.us/0Nw8 2017-03-25 23:21:35 since yesterday 2017-03-25 23:21:48 hope that help :) 2017-03-26 11:17:37 clandmeter: I’ve already fixed it… ^ 2017-03-26 11:17:57 clandmeter: but I agree that `rm -f` is better than `|| true` 2017-03-26 11:17:57 why did it stop? 2017-03-26 11:18:26 clandmeter: well, that’s a good question, I have no clue, it should not stop 2017-03-26 11:19:22 clandmeter: I’m afraid that it does not fail on rm now, but some further command that does not produce any output 2017-03-26 11:19:38 the log i checked was still about rm 2017-03-26 11:20:33 clandmeter: that’s wrong conclusion 2017-03-26 11:20:54 clandmeter: rm prints error message to stderr, but since it’s followed by `|| true`, it does not halt the script 2017-03-26 11:21:10 clandmeter: this is suspicious: `./pax-mark-vm "$pkgdir"/$_java_home true || return 1` ; what is `true` doing here? 2017-03-26 11:21:31 i have no clue 2017-03-26 11:22:24 clandmeter: git blame points to fabled 2017-03-26 11:22:30 clandmeter: 8fddb2b8636b0d7c158df067bc26dea13df4ff09 2017-03-26 11:23:15 clandmeter: it doesn’t make any sense, imo it’s typo 2017-03-26 11:23:30 could be, but that would be 3 typos 2017-03-26 11:23:50 copy-paste error 2017-03-26 11:24:19 the other archs did work right? 2017-03-26 11:25:26 clandmeter: yes; give me a sec… 2017-03-26 11:27:20 this set crap is going to give a lot of headaches :| 2017-03-26 11:27:33 it’s not a crap 2017-03-26 11:28:02 it reveals many bugs we have in abuild 2017-03-26 11:28:03 s 2017-03-26 11:28:34 your interpretation is incorrect 2017-03-26 11:28:39 ? 2017-03-26 11:28:51 yes its a good thing, the result is crap 2017-03-26 11:29:09 aha, I misunderstood it :) 2017-03-26 11:29:19 :) 2017-03-26 11:29:37 ahaa, the fabled’s change is not a typo 2017-03-26 11:29:59 command arg i guess? 2017-03-26 11:30:07 `if test "x${FAIL_ON_ERROR}" = "xtrue"; then`; `FAIL_ON_ERROR=${2}` 2017-03-26 11:30:26 yes, just no one sane use `true` as cli argument, but it’s OpenJDK, so… 2017-03-26 11:30:37 right 2017-03-26 11:33:43 if it fails, it prints error msg, so this command probably does not silently fail 2017-03-26 11:34:01 next is `rm -rf …`, this should not fail as well 2017-03-26 11:34:11 and the last one is `ln -sf` 2017-03-26 11:35:16 also doesn’t look like silent fail 2017-03-26 11:35:24 this is really weird 2017-03-26 11:36:19 did it actually restart? 2017-03-26 11:36:26 cause it doesnt seem to run at all 2017-03-26 11:36:35 hmm… 2017-03-26 11:36:52 its pribably still from first build 2017-03-26 11:37:26 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-26 11:37:46 that would explain it :) 2017-03-26 11:38:00 but its not restarting 2017-03-26 11:38:01 otherwise i have no clue what makes it halt 2017-03-26 11:38:14 algitbot: are you here? \o/ 2017-03-26 11:38:16 maybe mush something else 2017-03-26 11:38:21 push 2017-03-26 11:44:24 hmm 2017-03-26 11:44:35 the builder says its still running 2017-03-26 11:45:39 aha 2017-03-26 11:46:36 maybe just a little spatiotemporal anomaly :P 2017-03-26 11:47:50 but the logs says different :( 2017-03-26 11:50:37 what do you see directly on the build machine? 2017-03-26 11:51:23 I hope that it’s not a Schrödinger builder, so it must be still running, or does not run :) 2017-03-26 11:51:38 http://tpaste.us/qMPB 2017-03-26 11:51:43 its running alright... 2017-03-26 11:52:05 the log didnt update on build.a.o 2017-03-26 11:52:11 aha 2017-03-26 11:53:24 seems like the openjdk build tools cant properly utilize the mutlicores 2017-03-26 12:39:38 /buffer #serverops 2017-03-26 12:39:41 oops 2017-03-26 18:31:17 jirutka, damn that build is slow... 2017-03-26 18:31:25 its only using 1 core. 2017-03-26 20:32:07 meh 2017-03-27 10:17:31 ouch cmoka isn't avail on aarch64 :-/ 2017-03-27 12:36:07 hmm, armhf was/is really far behind 2017-03-27 12:36:33 people should watch this channel for build errors after pushing. 2017-03-27 12:36:49 ncopa, can you maybe turn off errors from ppc64le? 2017-03-27 15:44:55 fcolista: thanks for rdfind 2017-03-27 15:45:03 nettle is build dependency, not runtime 2017-03-27 15:45:21 makedepends="nettle-dev" 2017-03-27 15:45:29 is it possible to adjust the APKBUILD to avoid runtime dep? 2017-03-27 15:45:30 I didn't set nettle as runtime dependency 2017-03-27 15:45:37 yeah, but it is loaded 2017-03-27 15:45:39 it's in makedepends, not in depends 2017-03-27 15:45:58 ACTION thinks makedepends are automatically put in depends too 2017-03-27 15:46:03 not sure how to prevent this 2017-03-27 15:46:05 no 2017-03-27 15:46:11 is not 2017-03-27 15:46:30 hm :/ 2017-03-27 15:46:30 makedepends are ony installed for building 2017-03-27 15:46:34 dunno why is shipped 2017-03-27 15:46:57 tdtrask: 2017-03-27 15:46:58 apk add rdfind 2017-03-27 15:46:58 (1/1) Installing rdfind (1.3.5-r0) 2017-03-27 15:46:58 OK: 4252 MiB in 1357 packages 2017-03-27 15:46:58 Executing busybox-1.26.2-r0.trigger 2017-03-27 15:47:08 apk version nettle 2017-03-27 15:47:20 is it already installed on your box? 2017-03-27 15:47:25 right 2017-03-27 15:47:32 :) 2017-03-27 15:47:38 apk version nettle 2017-03-27 15:47:39 Installed: Available: 2017-03-27 15:47:39 nettle-3.3-r0 = 3.3-r0 2017-03-27 15:47:43 :P 2017-03-27 15:48:03 try 'apk del nettle' 2017-03-27 15:48:25 bad idea.. 2017-03-27 15:48:36 it's a dependency of ntons of pacakges 2017-03-27 15:48:40 *packages 2017-03-27 15:49:00 it won't uninstall, but will list packages that prevent deletion 2017-03-27 15:49:03 http://sprunge.us/YdZQ 2017-03-27 15:49:09 yes 2017-03-27 15:49:39 long list, but it does include rdfind 2017-03-27 15:49:43 Do you see anything wrongin the APKBUILD ? 2017-03-27 15:49:53 yes, it's the last one 2017-03-27 15:49:59 not sure if what I want is possible with abuild 2017-03-27 15:50:19 maybe ncopa/fabled can answer 2017-03-27 15:50:26 agreed 2017-03-27 15:50:28 hi 2017-03-27 15:50:45 hi ncopa 2017-03-27 15:50:48 ncopa: is it possible to have package in makedepends and not be a runtime dependency? 2017-03-27 15:50:58 yes 2017-03-27 15:50:59 ncopa: hi :) 2017-03-27 15:51:02 hi 2017-03-27 15:51:26 runtime dependencies are only pulled in if needed 2017-03-27 15:51:33 http://sprunge.us/LVNW 2017-03-27 15:51:36 looking at rdfind has dependency on nettle, despite only being in makedepends 2017-03-27 15:51:47 why this pull also nettle? 2017-03-27 15:52:09 abuild found something that pulls it in 2017-03-27 15:52:36 is the pkg in testing? 2017-03-27 15:52:49 Community 2017-03-27 15:52:59 >>> rdfind*: Tracing dependencies... 2017-03-27 15:52:59 so:libc.musl-x86.so.1 2017-03-27 15:52:59 so:libgcc_s.so.1 2017-03-27 15:52:59 so:libnettle.so.6 2017-03-27 15:52:59 so:libstdc++.so.6 2017-03-27 15:53:12 something is linked to libnettle 2017-03-27 15:53:24 run: scanelf -Rn | grep libnettle 2017-03-27 15:54:40 ncdev-edge-x86_64:~/aports/community/rdfind$ readelf -d pkg/rdfind/usr/bin/rdfind | grep nettle 2017-03-27 15:54:40 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libnettle.so.6] 2017-03-27 15:54:48 maybe I'm wrong and nettle is needed at runtime 2017-03-27 15:54:52 rdfind is linked against libnettle 2017-03-27 15:55:14 https://rdfind.pauldreik.se/ says "Installing from source requires the nettle library." 2017-03-27 15:55:20 but, it might be needed runtime too 2017-03-27 15:55:25 sorry for the distraction 2017-03-27 15:55:30 looks like it is needed 2017-03-27 15:55:54 /o\ 2017-03-27 15:56:18 my bad 2017-03-27 15:56:37 maybe you can build it with --disable-nettle? 2017-03-27 15:57:11 no no, I just misread the docs and thought it was a problem in abuild 2017-03-27 15:57:21 adding unnecessary dependency 2017-03-27 15:57:50 ok. i suppose the doc could have been clearer :) 2017-03-27 15:59:40 thanks for your help fcolista / ncopa 2017-03-27 16:24:07 r 2017-03-27 19:41:05 come on ;) 2017-03-27 19:41:15 ^ kaniini 2017-03-27 19:41:23 humm 2017-03-27 19:41:54 today is not my day :p 2017-03-27 19:51:20 ok i think that is cleaned up 2017-03-27 19:52:39 jirutka: good catch :) 2017-03-27 19:53:08 kaniini: just by accident :) 2017-03-28 05:23:08 $ apk info -L mesa-dricore 2017-03-28 05:23:10 mesa-dricore-12.0.6-r0 contains: 2017-03-28 05:23:12 etc/drirc 2017-03-28 05:23:16 i do not think this needs its own subpackage 2017-03-28 06:45:28 allow me to express my shock 2017-03-28 06:45:41 you know, if it would try main again, it would find that gtk+ can be built now. 2017-03-28 06:45:55 as well as qt. 2017-03-28 17:39:40 it seems that the build started to build testing/ packages, and a lot of them are failing 2017-03-28 17:40:36 They are failing because the dependency are not built yet 2017-03-28 22:45:20 heh 2017-03-28 22:46:45 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-28 22:47:34 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-29 00:46:01 oh, i see. it depends on luajit. 2017-03-29 01:04:24 gromero: looks like we have 97% archive coverage for main on ppc 2017-03-29 01:04:43 kaniini: \o/ 2017-03-29 01:06:30 kaniini: do you have an updated list of the packages that need attention by now? 2017-03-29 01:16:29 not yet 2017-03-29 01:16:35 it will do another rebuild soon 2017-03-29 01:16:51 kaniini: right 2017-03-29 01:17:07 i think i fixed all of them 2017-03-29 01:18:48 on openjdk, I'm still unsure if we would like go project by project dealing with the mcontext issue or if darias can kindly change the musl interface. On nodejs the project already contained a set of #ifdef's on possible different interfaces to signal context for each arch/glibc version, but on OpenJDK it can be a little bit different 2017-03-29 01:19:12 *like to go 2017-03-29 01:19:52 will take that tomorrow after looking at a sigfault on golang 2017-03-29 03:21:10 all the python stuff is going to fail because python isnt available yet 2017-03-29 04:15:09 ncopa: ffmpeg is missing on ppc64le, did you have some local disable on it? 2017-03-29 04:21:54 ahh 2017-03-29 04:21:57 x265 is blocking it 2017-03-29 04:26:20 that should unblock ffmpeg 2017-03-29 04:50:06 YES 2017-03-29 04:50:10 ffmpeg unblocked 2017-03-29 04:51:48 hmm, why is lua5.1-lgi blocked 2017-03-29 05:37:42 build/build-edge-ppc64le 31/50 1943/1987 main/asterisk 14.3.0-r0 2017-03-29 05:37:52 O_O 2017-03-29 05:37:58 WILL IT BUILD?!!!!??!! 2017-03-29 06:12:32 humm 2017-03-29 06:12:39 sbc-dev in archive, but not seen by builder. 2017-03-29 06:13:00 same as libzip-dev and tidyhtml-dev 2017-03-29 06:15:11 lets rebuild it and see if that helps 2017-03-29 14:46:12 humm 2017-03-29 14:46:20 algitbot not working correctly ? 2017-03-29 14:48:18 i was looking at the logs 2017-03-29 14:48:34 at least sbt and py-flask-sqlalchemy aren't built 2017-03-29 14:48:43 yes 2017-03-29 14:48:47 sbt is missing depends 2017-03-29 14:48:57 while py-flask-sqlalchemy has all depends built 2017-03-29 14:48:58 there's some things being ignored by the builder 2017-03-29 14:49:10 and some things don't seem to be on the builder 2017-03-29 14:49:16 bumping pkgrel on the depends 2017-03-29 14:49:19 seems to fix it 2017-03-29 14:49:23 i see 2017-03-29 14:49:30 let me try 2017-03-29 14:49:39 but algitbot is silent 2017-03-29 14:49:46 since the infrastructure move 2017-03-29 14:51:23 ncopa, algitbot isn't spitting out the commits messages, you know? 2017-03-29 14:51:52 its refreshingly quiet :) 2017-03-29 14:51:57 :D 2017-03-29 14:51:57 enjoy it as long as it last 2017-03-29 14:53:36 algitbot: hi 2017-03-29 14:54:43 that didnt last long :) 2017-03-29 14:59:30 gtg 2017-03-29 15:01:28 ncopa: any idea why the builder and what is actually in the archive is inconsistent? 2017-03-29 15:24:15 seems like its going all nuts :) 2017-03-29 15:27:27 ncopa: see #alpine-devel 2017-03-29 15:45:30 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-29 15:46:15 algitbot: retry master 2017-03-29 19:16:24 <^7heo> ahahahaha WE have WAITFORIT?! 2017-03-29 19:16:25 <^7heo> REALLY?! 2017-03-29 19:16:28 <^7heo> wtf. 2017-03-29 19:17:24 <^7heo> it's not even updated... 2017-03-29 20:33:52 gromero: looks like java & go are really the last remaining big things in the room 2017-03-29 20:34:23 kaniini, and qemu ? 2017-03-29 20:34:27 alpine on powerpc? 2017-03-29 20:34:29 yes 2017-03-29 20:34:49 and gdb 2017-03-29 20:35:36 kaniini: great! I'm taking care of openjdk and gdb. openjdk issue is quite the same of nodejs, so no big issue... gdb I have to check it. go is segfaulting and I have to debug it 2017-03-29 22:58:39 kaniini: alpine-ppc64le:~/git/aports/community/openjdk7$ java -version 2017-03-29 22:58:39 java version "1.7.0_131" 2017-03-29 22:58:39 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.6.9) (Alpine 7.131.2.6.9-r1) 2017-03-29 22:58:39 alpine-ppc64le:~/git/aports/community/openjdk7$ ls -l ~/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-* 2017-03-29 22:58:39 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.131-b00, mixed mode) 2017-03-29 22:58:40 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 16400696 Mar 29 22:50 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-7.131.2.6.9-r1.apk 2017-03-29 22:58:43 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 373378 Mar 29 22:50 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-doc-7.131.2.6.9-r1.apk 2017-03-29 22:58:46 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 143641 Mar 29 22:50 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-jre-7.131.2.6.9-r1.apk 2017-03-29 22:58:49 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 3575165 Mar 29 22:50 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-jre-base-7.131.2.6.9-r1.apk 2017-03-29 22:58:52 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 35550297 Mar 29 22:50 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk7-jre-lib-7.131.2.6.9-r1.apk 2017-03-29 22:59:03 nice! 2017-03-29 22:59:06 what about openjdk8? 2017-03-29 22:59:33 I will get there yet 2017-03-29 23:01:34 go issue seems pretty daunting 2017-03-29 23:01:54 i'm dealing with a go issue of my own ;/ 2017-03-29 23:02:28 heh 2017-03-29 23:50:14 kaniini: exactly same issue found in openjdk8 2017-03-29 23:50:15 alpine-ppc64le:~/git/aports/community/openjdk8$ java -version 2017-03-29 23:50:15 openjdk version "1.8.0_121" 2017-03-29 23:50:15 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 3.3.0) (Alpine 8.121.13-r2) 2017-03-29 23:50:15 alpine-ppc64le:~/git/aports/community/openjdk8$ ls -l ~/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-* 2017-03-29 23:50:15 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) 2017-03-29 23:50:17 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 15787454 Mar 29 23:43 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:20 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 108828602 Mar 29 23:42 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-dbg-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:23 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 2594066 Mar 29 23:42 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-demos-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:26 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 392629 Mar 29 23:42 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-doc-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:29 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 372993 Mar 29 23:43 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-jre-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:32 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 3939376 Mar 29 23:42 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-jre-base-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:35 -rw-r--r-- 1 alpine alpine 42495673 Mar 29 23:43 /home/alpine/packages/community/ppc64le/openjdk8-jre-lib-8.121.13-r2.apk 2017-03-29 23:50:46 gromero: please use some pastebin, do not paste more then 3 lines of text into IRC 2017-03-29 23:51:05 gromero: we usually use http://tpaste.us/ for copying from terminal 2017-03-29 23:51:05 jirutka: sorry, sure 2017-03-29 23:59:20 sigh, these last little modifications after testing complete build process… :/ 2017-03-30 00:03:12 hm 2017-03-30 00:41:44 so i don't see any PR for openjdk7 on aports 2017-03-30 00:41:49 is it not ready or such 2017-03-30 01:11:25 ffff i just stepped out 2017-03-31 09:03:16 n