2015-06-19 12:57:47 <ncopa> algitbot: hi
2015-06-19 12:59:32 <ncopa> algitbot: please be more reliable now...
2015-06-19 13:02:02 <clandmeter> algitbot: i just pushed
2015-06-19 13:03:00 <ncopa> i changed it since last test
2015-06-19 13:07:37 <clandmeter> build status will stay in devel?
2015-06-19 13:09:17 <ncopa> do we want that?
2015-06-19 13:10:37 <ncopa> i think in the long run we only want build errors in #alpine devel
2015-06-19 13:10:44 <barthalion> yep
2015-06-19 13:10:45 <ncopa> but i think for now, i just publish it all here
2015-06-19 13:10:48 <barthalion> and successes here
2015-06-19 13:11:08 <barthalion> or at least gather all build info, but it's probably impossible?
2015-06-19 13:11:17 <ncopa> no, its not impossible
2015-06-19 13:11:24 <ncopa> i need hack aports-build for that
2015-06-19 13:11:56 <ncopa> currently aports build sends to a 'irc/...' topic for things that should go to irc
2015-06-19 13:11:59 <barthalion> so message looks like "f93jf012 | x86_64: ok | x86: ok | armhf: failed (shortened url to logs)"
2015-06-19 13:12:00 <ncopa> but thats wrong
2015-06-19 13:12:17 <barthalion> then I could live with such message on #a-devel
2015-06-19 13:12:56 <ncopa> cannot collect all buildserver into same i think
2015-06-19 13:12:58 <ncopa> hum
2015-06-19 13:13:19 <ncopa> because armhf will take much more time that the others
2015-06-19 13:14:10 <barthalion> true
2015-06-19 13:14:14 <barthalion> just throwing ideas
2015-06-19 13:14:59 <ncopa> i will have the aports-build script to just thorow a message in mqtt topic 'build/<hostname>/errors' or similar
2015-06-19 13:15:07 <ncopa> so you can subscribe to only errors if you want
2015-06-19 13:15:53 <ncopa> if you want success you should be able to subscribe to 'mirror/<hostname>/<arch>' or similar
2015-06-19 13:16:28 <ncopa> so you in theory could apk upgrade on mqtt push
2015-06-19 13:39:28 <ncopa> algitbot: retry master
2015-06-19 13:40:25 <ncopa> algitbot: retry master
2015-06-19 13:41:13 <ncopa> algitbot: retry master
2015-06-19 13:41:29 <ncopa> algitbot: retry 3.2-stable
2015-06-19 13:42:06 <barthalion> doesn't seem to work?
2015-06-19 13:43:16 <ncopa> it works
2015-06-19 13:44:25 <ncopa> algitbot: retry 3.2-stable
2015-06-19 13:44:33 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-x86_64 pulling git
2015-06-19 13:44:33 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-x86 pulling git
2015-06-19 13:44:34 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-armhf pulling git
2015-06-19 13:44:34 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-x86_64 idle
2015-06-19 13:44:34 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-x86 idle
2015-06-19 13:44:34 <ncopa> build/build-3-2-armhf idle
2015-06-19 13:45:06 <ncopa> if you subscribe to build server activity you'll see they are pulling git, and then go to idle
2015-06-19 13:46:59 <ncopa> maybe we want it not give up if there are no new comits?
2015-06-19 13:47:29 <barthalion> the point of retry was repeat failed build
2015-06-19 13:47:42 <barthalion> if it works as the old retry did, it's fine
2015-06-19 13:47:55 <ncopa> i think it does
2015-06-19 13:48:34 <ncopa> hm
2015-06-19 13:53:15 <barthalion> I'm going home, I can check it later
2015-06-19 13:53:20 <barthalion> I mean, push something broken 8)
2015-06-19 13:53:44 <ncopa> it never worked better than this i think
2015-06-19 13:53:54 <ncopa> but i am thinking how to properly do this
2015-06-19 13:54:13 <ncopa> the problme is that the script will run in a loop
2015-06-19 13:54:28 <alacerda> clandmeter, thanks for xterm :)
2015-06-19 13:54:43 <ncopa> so if you do more pushes while it is building it will run again
2015-06-19 13:55:00 <ncopa> and it breaks out of the loop when there are no new git commits
2015-06-19 13:55:22 <clandmeter> alacerda: yw
2015-06-19 13:55:49 <barthalion> ncopa: that's fine I guess
2015-06-19 13:55:53 <ncopa> it will also loop if the upload failed
2015-06-19 13:56:02 <barthalion> unless we introduce some magical keyword to commit message
2015-06-19 13:56:11 <barthalion> so no new commits are build unless it's found there
2015-06-19 13:56:19 <ncopa> yeah htat is what i am thinking of
2015-06-19 13:56:36 <ncopa> if it find 'retry' in the payload, then if makes a forced run
2015-06-19 13:56:37 <barthalion> or we shouldn't even accept new commits until CI is fixed
2015-06-19 13:56:52 <barthalion> but it's probably overkill
2015-06-19 13:57:15 <ncopa> how do you push the fix then?
2015-06-19 13:58:10 <barthalion> I think git can check commit message and reject it if some condition is not met?
2015-06-19 13:58:39 <barthalion> "main/something: fix build \n\n builders: force"
2015-06-19 13:58:42 <barthalion> or something
2015-06-19 13:59:18 <ncopa> my take on it is
2015-06-19 13:59:31 <ncopa> if something is broke, it will not help simply retry
2015-06-19 13:59:52 <ncopa> so what we really want is exact build log
2015-06-19 13:59:59 <ncopa> url to exact build log
2015-06-19 14:00:13 <barthalion> I'm going home, let's talk about it on monday
2015-06-19 14:00:16 <ncopa> ok
2015-06-19 14:00:22 <barthalion> see you
2015-06-19 14:00:28 <ncopa> have a nice weekend
2015-06-19 14:01:19 <clandmeter> ncopa: before you go, can you check that build error i have?
2015-06-19 14:01:40 <ncopa> ok
2015-06-19 14:04:53 <ncopa> to.c:(.text+0x702): undefined reference to `inet_net_pton'
2015-06-19 14:04:53 <ncopa> to.c:(.text+0x759): undefined reference to `inet_net_pton'
2015-06-19 14:04:56 <ncopa> and
2015-06-19 14:05:16 <ncopa> lets take it in #alpine-devel
2015-06-19 14:27:49 <vkris> ncopa: shouldn't dev.a.o logs for commits have algitbot msgs too !
2015-06-19 14:30:56 <ncopa> vkris: http://dev.alpinelinux.org/irclogs/%23alpine-commits-2015-06.log
2015-06-19 14:48:01 <vkris> I mean msgs from "algibot"
2015-06-23 07:35:11 <barthalion> ehm
2015-06-23 07:35:23 <barthalion> I don't think we want notifications from gitolite-admin
2015-06-23 07:35:27 <barthalion> ncopa: ↑
2015-06-23 07:36:00 <ncopa> maybe not
2015-06-23 07:38:19 <ncopa> permissions of generated tarball is wrong too
2015-06-23 07:45:49 <ScrumpyJack> ay!
2015-06-23 07:46:16 <ncopa> oy!
2015-06-23 07:46:22 <barthalion> ey!
2015-06-23 07:47:42 <ncopa> algitbot: please dont try to be human...
2015-06-23 07:56:29 <ncopa> nice!
2015-06-23 07:56:48 <ncopa> in my git push console i see:
2015-06-23 07:56:55 <ncopa> remote: /archive/test/test-1.6.tar.xz created
2015-06-23 07:56:55 <ncopa> remote: http://dev.alpinelinux.org/archive/test/test-1.6.tar.xz
2015-06-23 08:07:14 <ncopa> ok, i think git messages are ok now
2015-06-23 08:07:32 <ncopa> i should deal with build server messages and build error messages
2015-06-23 08:07:49 <ncopa> but i think i need a permanent logfile location
2015-06-23 08:08:01 <ncopa> a central build log server
2015-06-23 10:43:15 <vkris> why not all bots/andq
2015-06-23 10:43:41 <vkris> in this channel
2015-06-23 10:44:08 <barthalion> define all
2015-06-23 10:44:14 <barthalion> we have both commit and build messages here
2015-06-23 10:44:29 <vkris> that way we can watch it on one screen , eat popcorn and chat on -devel
2015-06-23 10:44:41 <barthalion> this is exactly what we do now
2015-06-23 10:44:42 <vkris> I mean chat about it
2015-06-23 10:44:44 <barthalion> well, at least I do
2015-06-23 10:45:39 <vkris> I mean a separate dedicated AL bot channel
2015-06-23 10:46:14 <vkris> and enhanced algitbot <command>
2015-06-23 10:47:04 <vkris> if we want specific msg copied/diverted to -devel
2015-06-23 12:07:28 <clandmeter> ncopa: im sure ppl are not fond of colors, but something to distinguish repo's msg would be nice.
2015-06-23 12:11:03 <barthalion> I don't mind it either
2015-06-23 12:11:12 <barthalion> colored messages by bots makes sense
2015-06-23 12:13:33 <alacerda> :1
2015-06-23 12:13:34 <clandmeter> it would make the last to commits a bit easier to distinguish
2015-06-23 12:13:35 <alacerda> +1
2015-06-23 12:13:42 <clandmeter> two even
2015-06-23 12:14:01 <ncopa> clandmeter: how do i do that
2015-06-23 12:14:23 <ncopa> you want the repo to be highlighted?
2015-06-23 12:18:25 <clandmeter> abuild:master could be in another color (or the rest to limit colors)
2015-06-23 12:19:07 <clandmeter> not sure if all repos including tags should have another color?
2015-06-23 12:19:54 <clandmeter> test tags
2015-06-23 12:20:46 <clandmeter> that bot is so intelligent
2015-06-23 12:21:57 <vkris> I use multitail and clog
2015-06-23 12:24:11 <ncopa> is bold enough?
2015-06-23 12:24:27 <ncopa> or should I set a hard color?
2015-06-23 12:25:05 <clandmeter> you make only aports bold?
2015-06-23 12:25:30 <ncopa> colors are \x0307nice\x03
2015-06-23 12:25:36 <ncopa> bah
2015-06-23 12:25:38 <ncopa> :)
2015-06-23 12:25:44 <barthalion> well, I don't really care about commit author, so it could be more gray or something
2015-06-23 12:26:15 <ncopa> colors are ^C03nice^C
2015-06-23 12:26:55 <ncopa> https://github.com/myano/jenni/wiki/IRC-String-Formatting
2015-06-23 12:27:05 <ncopa> seem like \x02 is bold
2015-06-23 12:27:56 <barthalion>  test
2015-06-23 12:28:09 <barthalion> bold
2015-06-23 12:28:27 <ncopa> maybe colors are disabled in this channel?
2015-06-23 12:28:39 <barthalion> they are not, see my messages
2015-06-23 12:29:09 <ncopa> thats why i ask. you messages has no formatting :)
2015-06-23 12:29:20 <barthalion> oh well
2015-06-23 12:29:21 <ncopa> i suppose it my client that strips the colors
2015-06-23 12:29:25 <barthalion> looks like something with your client then
2015-06-23 12:29:33 <tdtrask> 
ACTION doesn't see any colors with XChat

2015-06-23 12:31:08 <ncopa> no, not here
2015-06-23 12:31:13 <alacerda> neither
2015-06-23 12:31:20 <ncopa> hexchat
2015-06-23 12:31:22 <vkrishn> red
2015-06-23 12:31:35 <alacerda> hexchat as well
2015-06-23 12:33:33 <barthalion> nope
2015-06-23 12:33:44 <ncopa> i dont know how to do it then
2015-06-23 12:34:41 <ncopa> ^14Colored Text^ — Grey colored text.
2015-06-23 12:36:03 <alacerda> \x03,04Test
2015-06-23 12:36:05 <barthalion> \x03test
2015-06-23 12:36:08 <barthalion> not really
2015-06-23 12:36:15 <barthalion> I guess my client escapes that
2015-06-23 12:36:21 <ncopa> %Ctest%O
2015-06-23 12:37:08 <clandmeter> blabla \x035,12to be colored text and background\x03 blabla
2015-06-23 12:37:12 <clandmeter> :)
2015-06-23 12:37:16 <ncopa> lol
2015-06-23 12:37:22 <alacerda> tes
2015-06-23 12:37:55 <alacerda> ^K8,4Goooo
2015-06-23 12:37:58 <ncopa> i feel like i am with a bunch of 3yrs kids who found color pencils :)
2015-06-23 12:38:01 <alacerda> :)
2015-06-23 12:38:07 <alacerda> hauiehaeuiea
2015-06-23 12:39:09 <clandmeter> cmon algitbot, color our lives.
2015-06-23 12:39:15 <alacerda> ^C5,12Why not?^C
2015-06-23 12:40:44 <alacerda> '\x03what?'
2015-06-23 12:40:46 <alacerda> '\x03,what?'
2015-06-23 12:40:50 <alacerda> '\x03'
2015-06-23 12:41:39 <alacerda> \u000304A red message
2015-06-23 12:42:45 <alacerda> https://www.npmjs.com/package/irc-colors related ?
2015-06-23 12:43:29 <clandmeter> no
2015-06-23 12:43:52 <barthalion> ncopa: broken pencils
2015-06-23 12:44:03 <alacerda> algitbot what is yout problem?
2015-06-23 12:44:26 <alacerda> '\x03'Won't you help us?
2015-06-23 12:45:00 <ncopa> ha
2015-06-23 12:45:06 <alacerda> ncopa, http://docs.dal.net/docs/modes.html#2.3 ?
2015-06-23 12:45:14 <fabled> Hello
2015-06-23 12:45:15 <ncopa> at least it parses \x00 properly :)
2015-06-23 12:45:43 <fabled>  so mode -c ?
2015-06-23 12:46:23 <clandmeter> ah that possible
2015-06-23 12:46:43 <vkrishn> multitail view of this channel, http://i.imgur.com/KB1VE0l.png
2015-06-23 12:47:06 <clandmeter> now how to set channel modes
2015-06-23 12:47:12 <ncopa>  /mode -c ?
2015-06-23 12:47:24 <clandmeter> i gues need to specificy channel
2015-06-23 12:47:34 <ncopa> i think only clandmeter can do that
2015-06-23 12:47:44 <alacerda> Channel #alpine-commits modes: +cnt
2015-06-23 12:47:47 <alacerda> :)
2015-06-23 12:47:59 <alacerda> ncopa, we need -c
2015-06-23 12:48:11 <clandmeter> :D
2015-06-23 12:48:20 <clandmeter> haha
2015-06-23 12:48:23 <alacerda> '\x03'color???
2015-06-23 12:48:25 <alacerda> hehe
2015-06-23 12:48:32 <clandmeter> freaking chanserv
2015-06-23 12:48:42 <ncopa> isnt +c color filter
2015-06-23 12:48:51 <alacerda> \x035,12restarting the color war
2015-06-23 12:48:58 <clandmeter> yes but chanserv set it back
2015-06-23 12:49:01 <clandmeter> need to set it global
2015-06-23 12:49:04 <barthalion> set it with chanserv
2015-06-23 12:49:06 <alacerda> The +c mode stands for colourless.
2015-06-23 12:49:10 <ncopa> :)
2015-06-23 12:49:11 <ncopa> oh
2015-06-23 12:49:32 <alacerda> + means less ?!
2015-06-23 12:49:34 <alacerda> weird!
2015-06-23 12:49:42 <ncopa> c
2015-06-23 12:49:42 <ncopa> (color filter) 	This mode activates the colour filter for the channel. This filters out bold, underline, reverse video, beeps, mIRC colour codes, and ANSI escapes. Note that escape sequences will sometimes leave cruft sent to the channel, just without the escape characters themselves.
2015-06-23 12:50:02 <alacerda> http://docs.dal.net/docs/modes.html#2.3
2015-06-23 12:50:04 <alacerda> :|
2015-06-23 12:50:11 <alacerda> hehe
2015-06-23 12:50:33 <clandmeter> no
2015-06-23 12:50:35 <alacerda> \o/
2015-06-23 12:50:35 <clandmeter> ;-)
2015-06-23 12:51:04 <ncopa> so commit repo bold?
2015-06-23 12:51:22 <alacerda> red ?
2015-06-23 12:51:56 <ncopa> congrats, we have finally a bikeshedding!
2015-06-23 12:52:42 <alacerda> :)
2015-06-23 12:52:52 <clandmeter> ncopa: what good would only repo bold do?
2015-06-23 12:53:51 <ncopa> make the commits stand out?
2015-06-23 12:54:57 <barthalion> yay
2015-06-23 12:55:00 <ncopa> like that?
2015-06-23 12:55:02 <vkrishn> :)
2015-06-23 12:55:23 <clandmeter> i was refering to this
2015-06-23 12:55:24 <clandmeter> 13:21 < algitbot> abuild:master (Natanael Copa) abuild: fix circular dependency for symlink deps | http://dup.pw/abuild/3f3281c8
2015-06-23 12:55:27 <clandmeter> 13:23 < algitbot> aports:master (Natanael Copa) main/abuild: fix circular dep problem for symlink deps | http://dup.pw/aports/7ab85b7a
2015-06-23 12:55:44 <ncopa> you want the entire line colored?
2015-06-23 12:55:45 <clandmeter> i had to look twice to get it :)
2015-06-23 12:56:05 <alacerda> ncopa, give us a red sample
2015-06-23 12:56:48 <fabled> no workey here
2015-06-23 12:56:53 <fabled> whee
2015-06-23 12:57:03 <alacerda> imho colorize the entire line isn't a good idea
2015-06-23 12:57:10 <ncopa> thats what i thought too
2015-06-23 12:57:21 <barthalion> different color per repository?
2015-06-23 12:57:31 <clandmeter> yes diff per repo
2015-06-23 12:57:39 <clandmeter> or diff per repo and diff per user
2015-06-23 12:57:46 <clandmeter> or user all have same color
2015-06-23 12:57:53 <ncopa> problem with color is that it might make it unreadable, depending on you colorscheme
2015-06-23 12:58:12 <clandmeter> aslong its not white or black, it should be ok?
2015-06-23 12:58:25 <ncopa> if you have a black backtround it might be difficult to read blue
2015-06-23 12:58:28 <clandmeter> if you have a pink background, you already have an issue.
2015-06-23 12:58:33 <ncopa> :D
2015-06-23 12:59:06 <clandmeter> do all repo's report here?
2015-06-23 12:59:10 <ncopa> yes
2015-06-23 12:59:25 <barthalion> so let's hardcode it for official ones
2015-06-23 12:59:35 <barthalion> we want apk-tools, abuild and aports for start
2015-06-23 12:59:53 <barthalion> red, green, yellow and we're good to go
2015-06-23 13:00:10 <vkrishn> that is why only small part of the line should be done, <key word> but should be bold/standout
2015-06-23 13:00:23 <alacerda> repo = red and aports = bold
2015-06-23 13:00:33 <vkrishn> red+bold
2015-06-23 13:00:41 <clandmeter> only bold != master
2015-06-23 13:01:08 <ncopa> what is it we want highlight, its the repo right?
2015-06-23 13:01:12 <alacerda> kkkk ncopa is going crazy
2015-06-23 13:01:22 <ncopa> i need coffe
2015-06-23 13:01:41 <alacerda> good idea... this is what i am going to do
2015-06-23 13:02:09 <alacerda> <coffee>
2015-06-23 13:02:19 <vkrishn> neat but <master> different color
2015-06-23 13:02:20 <ncopa> do we want specific repo to stand out?
2015-06-23 13:02:26 <ncopa> eg aports?
2015-06-23 13:02:31 <vkrishn> as for <branch>
2015-06-23 13:02:49 <clandmeter> ncopa: like barthalion said
2015-06-23 13:02:54 <clandmeter> have those 3 colors maybe?
2015-06-23 13:02:58 <clandmeter> or any color you like
2015-06-23 13:03:09 <barthalion> and let's make the rest grey
2015-06-23 13:03:16 <ncopa> uncolored
2015-06-23 13:03:30 <barthalion> sure
2015-06-23 13:03:35 <barthalion> just throwing my thoughts
2015-06-23 13:03:38 <ncopa> i wonder if it would be enough to only make 'aports' bold
2015-06-23 13:03:41 <ncopa> and nothing else
2015-06-23 13:03:49 <clandmeter> i prefer color or bold
2015-06-23 13:04:03 <clandmeter> it will stand out from the rest
2015-06-23 13:06:23 <clandmeter> maybe a slight diff color for the rest? grey?
2015-06-23 13:06:56 <clandmeter> ncopa: and green for build upload and red for build failure :)
2015-06-23 13:07:34 <clandmeter> and blinking when we mention ncopa
2015-06-23 13:08:40 <ncopa> it blinks here when you mention ncopa already
2015-06-23 13:08:48 <ncopa> but green for uplaod and red for error sounds good
2015-06-23 13:25:57 <alacerda> </coffee>
2015-06-23 13:27:09 <alacerda> algitbot, am I sending files ^^ ?
2015-06-23 13:27:10 <alacerda> :P
2015-06-23 13:27:13 <ncopa> no
2015-06-23 13:27:16 <alacerda> hehe
2015-06-23 13:27:24 <ncopa> i am injecting  testcommits
2015-06-23 13:27:46 <alacerda> any decision ?
2015-06-23 13:27:57 <alacerda> bold, red, yellow, pink ?
2015-06-23 13:28:22 <alacerda> I like clandmeter's idea: "and blinking when we mention ncopa"
2015-06-23 13:28:23 <alacerda> :)
2015-06-23 13:28:47 <ncopa> i actualy think you can configure your irc client for those things
2015-06-23 13:29:32 <ncopa> currently the goal is: bold for 'aports' commits and normal for everythign else
2015-06-23 13:29:49 <ncopa> successful upload green
2015-06-23 13:29:54 <ncopa> and build errors red
2015-06-23 13:31:33 <vkrishn> if commit by user, then color (<user>)
2015-06-23 13:32:51 <vkrishn> or maybe user commit should be grey line except the "(<name>)"
2015-06-23 13:32:54 <vkrishn> grey is possible ?
2015-06-23 13:33:11 <ncopa> everything is possible
2015-06-23 13:33:17 <ncopa> the impossible just tames more time...
2015-06-23 13:33:21 <ncopa> takes*
2015-06-23 13:33:22 <alacerda> i think grey is uncolored, isn't it?
2015-06-23 13:33:41 <ncopa> depends on your color settings in your client i suppose
2015-06-23 13:42:24 <ncopa> ok
2015-06-23 13:43:10 <clandmeter> im seeing an I with white bg infront of new file.
2015-06-23 13:44:24 <ncopa> are aports messages ok?
2015-06-23 13:45:41 <alacerda> ... |Natanael Copa| ... would be better
2015-06-23 13:46:18 <ncopa> thats trivial to fix
2015-06-23 13:46:23 <ncopa> so thats fixed now
2015-06-23 13:47:55 <alacerda> super!
2015-06-23 13:49:32 <ncopa> maybe even [Natanael Copa]
2015-06-23 13:54:26 <alacerda> wow
2015-06-23 13:55:41 <alacerda> remote: fatal: could not create archive file '/archive/setup-box/setup-box-1.0_rc5.tar': Permission denied
2015-06-23 14:31:02 <clandmeter> do we get double msg all the time?
2015-06-23 14:36:41 <alacerda> clandmeter, the first is push second one is push --tags
2015-06-23 14:37:02 <alacerda> hun ?!
2015-06-23 14:37:10 <clandmeter> dont mention tags
2015-06-23 14:37:17 <alacerda> kkkkk
2015-06-23 14:37:26 <alacerda> what happens if I say: tags ?
2015-06-23 14:37:48 <clandmeter> alacerda: but should our tags bot mention it?
2015-06-23 14:38:43 <alacerda> what is the purpose of this behaviour when we mention tags ?
2015-06-23 14:41:44 <alacerda> I don't this out t a g s should be prompted here... donno if its trivial to fix
2015-06-23 14:42:08 <alacerda> s/I don't this out/ I don't think our/ 
2015-06-23 14:42:41 <clandmeter> what about donno?
2015-06-23 14:42:56 <alacerda> ¬¬"
2015-06-23 14:45:06 <clandmeter> :)
2015-06-23 14:45:58 <fcolista> donna in italian is "female"
2015-06-23 14:46:03 <fcolista> maybe donno is "male"
2015-06-23 14:46:05 <fcolista> :)
2015-06-23 14:47:06 <alacerda> kkkk ok, ok s/donno/do not know/
2015-06-23 14:47:07 <alacerda> :P
2015-06-23 14:47:19 <clandmeter> its probably portugese :p
2015-06-23 14:47:51 <ncopa> i thinght donno in portugues was "owner"
2015-06-23 14:47:57 <ncopa> but thats maybe dono
2015-06-23 14:48:53 <ncopa> oh interesting
2015-06-23 14:48:56 <clandmeter> i dont even know how to spell Portuguese :)
2015-06-23 14:49:06 <ncopa> commits are in reverse order
2015-06-23 14:56:14 <pluesch> is the source for algitbot available?
2015-06-23 15:00:19 <clandmeter> its called sircbot
2015-06-24 13:29:20 <alacerda> clandmeter, it seems that duplication is not due to push --t a g s
2015-06-24 13:29:54 <alacerda> as I suggested yesterday
2015-06-25 13:16:38 <fabled> ncopa, linux-grsec failed:
2015-06-25 13:16:38 <fabled> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/buildozer/aports/main/linux-grsec/src/build-virtgrsec'
2015-06-25 13:16:38 <fabled> make: Leaving directory '/home/buildozer/aports/main/linux-grsec/src/linux-3.18'
2015-06-25 13:16:38 <fabled> /home/buildozer/aports/main/linux-grsec/src/linux-3.18/Makefile:683: *** Your gcc installation does not support plugins.  If the necessary headers for plugin support are missing, they should be installed.  On Debian, apt-get install gcc-<ver>-plugin-dev.  If you choose to ignore this error and lessen the improvements provided by this patch, re-run make with the DISABLE_PAX_PLUGINS=y argument..  Stop.
2015-06-25 13:16:40 <fabled> Makefile:145: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
2015-06-25 13:17:18 <fabled> maybe gcc5.1 renamed some files and they got lost?
2015-06-25 13:17:38 <fabled> is this the first kernel compilewith gcc-5.1?
2015-06-25 13:18:06 <ncopa> huh
2015-06-25 13:18:33 <ncopa> $ gcc --version
2015-06-25 13:18:33 <ncopa> gcc (Alpine 5.1.0) 5.1.0
2015-06-25 13:18:58 <ncopa> i built it on my dev box
2015-06-25 13:19:24 <ncopa> yes, i think its the first gcc5 built kernel
2015-06-25 13:19:35 <fabled> hmm
2015-06-25 13:20:24 <ncopa> could it be that some c++ prog needs to be rebuilt?
2015-06-25 13:21:19 <fabled> mm
2015-06-25 13:21:23 <fabled> yes
2015-06-25 13:21:26 <fabled> gcc is c++ now
2015-06-25 13:21:29 <ncopa> or some buildtime dep is missing?
2015-06-25 13:21:31 <fabled> g++ isprobably needed
2015-06-25 13:21:55 <fabled> is g++ in build-base?
2015-06-25 13:22:01 <ncopa> should be
2015-06-25 13:22:15 <ncopa> weird, it does build on my dev box
2015-06-25 13:22:55 <ncopa> libgmpxx?
2015-06-25 13:23:32 <fabled> maybe
2015-06-25 13:23:51 <ncopa> it was rebuilt
2015-06-25 13:23:54 <ncopa> commit 01f5888e5db5d540717ae440b883e0939d8d3df3
2015-06-25 13:23:54 <ncopa> Author: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
2015-06-25 13:23:54 <ncopa> Date:   Mon Jun 22 08:48:11 2015 +0000
2015-06-25 13:23:54 <ncopa>     main/gmp: rebuild with gcc5 libstdc++ ABI change
2015-06-25 15:03:56 <ncopa> really really weird that build servers does not build kernels
2015-06-25 15:04:10 <ncopa> i have no idea what is going on
2015-06-25 15:04:17 <ncopa> i cannot reproduce it on my dev box
2015-06-25 15:06:25 <ncopa> i will have to investigate that tomorrow
2015-06-26 07:11:18 <fabled> ncopa, ^^^ so linux-grsec-dev needs to depend on those headers too?
2015-06-26 07:13:48 <ncopa> seems like unrelated
2015-06-26 07:13:58 <ncopa>  /home/buildozer/aports/main/open-vm-tools-grsec/src/open-vm-tools-9.10.0-2476743/lib/include/vm_basic_asm_x86.h:439:19: fatal error: mul64.h: No such file or directory
2015-06-26 07:13:58 <ncopa> compilation terminated.
2015-06-26 07:15:00 <ncopa> http://sourceforge.net/p/open-vm-tools/mailman/message/34016246/
2015-06-26 07:16:35 <fabled> oh
2015-06-26 07:17:51 <fabled> sigh: I think simplest workaround for you at this point is to use a GCC version >= 4.4 and < 5.0.
2015-06-26 07:18:07 <ncopa> yeah i saw
2015-06-26 07:18:12 <ncopa> i'll look at it soonish
2015-06-27 18:37:50 <barthalion> 
ACTION crosses his fingers

2015-06-27 18:45:09 <barthalion> yay
2015-06-27 18:49:38 <barthalion> ncopa: looking at build.al.o, armhf builder went postal
2015-06-27 18:49:50 <barthalion> shows completely unrelated packages
2015-06-27 18:49:54 <barthalion> and suddenly finished
2015-06-29 08:37:44 <ncopa> leo-unglaub: hi
2015-06-29 08:37:56 <ncopa> there you go^^^
2015-06-29 08:38:05 <leo-unglaub> hey, cool :)
2015-06-29 08:44:10 <leo-unglaub> so this channel here is just for commit/bot logs?
2015-06-29 08:44:18 <barthalion> yep
2015-06-29 08:44:20 <leo-unglaub> or do you discuss commits as well?
2015-06-29 08:44:35 <barthalion> very rarely
2015-06-29 08:44:55 <clandmeter> its kind of new, and we dont have any rules set.
2015-06-29 08:46:07 <ncopa> and i would prefer not introduce any rules, unless necessary
2015-06-29 08:46:28 <ncopa> the idea with this channel was to remove the bot spam from #alpine-devel
2015-06-29 11:48:58 <ncopa> leo-unglaub: there comes the pidgin stuff^^^
2015-06-29 11:49:58 <leo-unglaub> great
2015-06-29 11:50:07 <leo-unglaub> that should make the executable a lot smaller
2015-06-29 11:50:08 <leo-unglaub> :)
2015-06-29 11:50:18 <leo-unglaub> and get rid of gstreamer 0.10 entirely :)
2015-06-29 11:50:19 <ncopa> and fewer deps
2015-06-29 15:23:08 <clandmeter> ncopa: blind push?
2015-06-29 15:43:14 <ScrumpyJack> hmm, gst-libav1 build fine for me
2015-06-29 15:46:12 <ScrumpyJack> hadn't bumped. duh!
2015-06-29 17:10:56 <ScrumpyJack> fwiw gst-libav1 bumped builds for me